Skip to main content
Log in

A Competition Model of IRT Distributions During the First Training Stages of Variable-Interval Schedule

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mathematical model based on the competition between neural networks is proposed. The model proposes that the neural network controlling the lever-pressing response during variable-interval schedules of reinforcement should compete with all other behavior-controlling networks. The network with the highest activity would be expressed as a behavior by a winner-take-all mechanism. This theoretical model fits the interresponse time distributions in 95% of cases at p<0.05 significance level, and 100% of cases at p<0.01, when tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test of goodness of fit. The model is discussed in psychological terms and possible generalizations are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BLOUGH, D. S. (1966). The reinforcement of least-frequent interresponse times. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 9, 581–591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BLOUGH, P. M., & BLOUGH, A. J. (1968). The distribution of interresponse times in the pigeon during variable interval reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 11, 23–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BULLOCK, T. H. (1970). The reliability of neurons. Journal of General Physiology, 55, 565–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FELDMAN, J. A., & BALLARD, D. H. (1982). Connectionist models and their properties. Cognitive Science, 6, 205–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GALBICKA, G., & BRANCH, M. N. (1981). Selective punishment of interresponse times. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 35, 311–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GÓMEZ, C., CANALS, J., TORRES, B., & DELGADO-GARCIA, J. M. (1986). Analysis of the fluctuations in the interspike intervals of abducens nucleus neurons during ocular fixation in the alert cat. Brain Research, 381, 401–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GÓMEZ, C., QUERO, J. M., & ESCUDERO, M. (1989). Computer simulation of the neural discharge carried by the abducens nerve during eye fixation in the cat. International Journal Biomedical Computing, 24, 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GÓMEZ, C., RUIZ-ADAN, A., LLOSA, M., & RUIZ, G. (1992). Quantitative analysis of Irt variability during the first training stages of a variable interval schedule in rats. The Psychological Record, 42, 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOTTMAN, J. M. (1981). Time series analysis. A comprehensive introduction for social scientists. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, N. I., & KOTZ, S. (1970). Continuous univariate distributions-1. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • KILLEEN, P. R., & FETTERMAN, J. G. (1988). A behavioral theory of timing. Psychological Review, 95, 274–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KINTSCH, W. (1965). Frequency distribution of interresponse times during VI and VR reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 8, 347–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MAZUR, J. E. (1990). Learning and behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • PAGE, S., & NEURINGER, A. (1985). Variability is an operant. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 429–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEAR, J. J. (1985). Spatio-temporal patterns of behavior produced by variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Analysis of behavior, 44, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SOKAL, R. R., & ROHLF, F. S. (1981). Biometry. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • YUILLE, A. L., & GRZYWACZ, N. M. (1989). A winner-take-all mechanism based on presynaptic inhibition feedback. Neural Computation, 1, 334–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by grants from the Junta de Andalucia, Sevilla University and the DGICYTTM90-152.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gómez, C. A Competition Model of IRT Distributions During the First Training Stages of Variable-Interval Schedule. Psychol Rec 42, 285–293 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399602

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399602

Navigation