Skip to main content
Log in

Koordinationsmechanismen und Innovativität von Netzwerken: eine empirische Analyse

  • Netzwerke
  • Published:
Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In der Literatur zu Netzwerken wird der Zusammenhang zwischen der Koordination von Organisationen und Ergebnissen auf Netzwerkebene diskutiert. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird gefragt: Welchen Zusammenhang gibt es zwischen der Art der Koordination und dem Innovationserfolg — der Innovativität — von koordinierten Unternehmensnetzwerken? Mit einer hierfür geeigneten Methode — der Qualitative Comparative Analysis — soll herausgefunden werden, welche Kombination verschiedener Koordinationsinstrumente mit hoher Innovativität zusammenhängt. Über einen mehrstufigen Befragungsprozess wurden koordinierte Netzwerke in Deutschland identifiziert und 187 von ihnen untersucht. Es zeigt sich, dass Prozess-Standardisierung eine notwendige Bedingung für hohe Innovativität ist. Das Ergebnis wird diskutiert hinsichtlich der Bedeutung von Prozess-Standardisierung als Mittel der Wissensübertragung, als Governance-Mechanismus und als Indikator für das in Regeln gespeicherte Wissen von Netzwerken.

Abstract

In this paper we explore the relationship between different coordination mechanisms of interorganizational networks and their innovativeness at the network level of analysis. We analyze whether innovativeness is systematically related to particular combinations of three different coordination processes. Via a multi-stage process, we identified and collected data of 187 coordinated interorganizational networks in Germany. We analyzed these networks by means of an appropriate tool — Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) — to identify which combinations of coordination mechanisms are systematically related to high innovativeness. The results show that process standardization is a necessary condition to innovativeness at the network level. We discuss the meaning of process-standardization with regard to its effects on knowledge-transfer, network governance and interorganizational routines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  • Aiken, Michael/ Hage, Jerald (1968), Organizational Interdependence and Intra-Organizational Structure, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 33, S. 912–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, Klaus/ Erichson, Bernd/ Plinke, Wulff/ Weiber, Rolf (2008), Multivariate Analysemethoden, 12. Aufl., Berlin.

  • Blau, Peter M./ Schoenherr, Richard A. (1971), The structure of organizations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode, Alexander/ Däberitz, Ingo/ Fionik, Juri (2011), Messung von Kooperationserfolg in Clustern, in: zfbf, 63. Jg., S. 662–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodewes, Wynand E. (2002), Formalization and innovation revisited, in: European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 5, S. 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boer, Harry/ During, Willem E. (2001), Innovation, what innovation? A comparison between product, process and organisational innovation, in: International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 22, S. 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borchardt, Andreas (2006), Koordinationsinstrumente in virtuellen Unternehmen: Eine empirische Untersuchung anhand lose gekoppelter Systeme, Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burr, Wolfgang (1999), Koordination durch Regeln in selbstorganisierenden Unternehmensnetzwerken, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 69. Jg., S. 1159–1180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, John/ Mansfield, Roger (1972), Technology, Size, and Organization Structure, in: Sociology, Vol. 6, S. 369–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M./ Levin, Richard C. (1989), Empirical studies of innovation and market structure, in: Schmalensee, Richard/ Willig, Robert D. (Hrsg.), Handbook of industrial organization, Amsterdam, S. 1059–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, Richard L. (1978), A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation, in: The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21, S. 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, Henri C. (2004), Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Accounting, in: Organizations and Society, Vol. 29, S. 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanaraj, Charles/ Parkhe, Arvind (2006), Orchestrating Innovation Networks, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, S. 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, D. Harold/ Glick, William H. (1994), Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, S. 230–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Yves L./ Olk, Paul M./ Ring, Peter S. (2000), Formation processes of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead?, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, S. 239–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Jeffrey H./ Nobeoka, Kentaro (2000), Creating and Managing a High-Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The Toyota Case, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, S. 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989), Building Theories from Case Study Research, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, S. 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, Matthias/ Hatak, Isabella/ Schulte, Reinhard/ Kraus, Sascha (2011), Verträge, Vertrauen und Unternehmenserfolg in Automobilclustern, in: zfbf, 63. Jg., S. 689–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, Peer C. (2007), A Set-Theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 1180–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, Peer C. (2011), Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54, S. 393–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, Sumantra/ Bartlett, Christopher A. (1990), The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, S. 603–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, Anna (1997), Governance Structures, Coordination Mechanisms and Cognitive Models, in: Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 1, S. 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, Anna/ Soda, Giuseppe (1995), Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms, in: Organization Studies, Vol. 16, S. 183–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi (1990), Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey, in: Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 27, S. 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausberg, Bernhard (2006), Cluster und Kompetenznetze beraten — Erfahrungen des VD1 Technologiezentrums, in: Sydow, Jörg/ Manning, Stephan (Hrsg.), Netzwerke beraten: Über Netzwerkberatung und Beratungsnetzwerke, Wiesbaden, S. 127–144.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, Jürgen (2004), Innovationsmanagement, 3. Aufl., München.

  • Hurrle, Beatrice/ Kieser, Alfred (2005), Sind Key Informants verlässliche Datenlieferanten?, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 65, S. 584–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowicz-Panjaitan, Martyna/ Noorderhaven, Niels G. (2008), Formal and informal interorganizational learning within strategic alliances, in: Research Policy, Vol. 37, S. 1337–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Daniel/ Kahn, Robert L. (1978), The social psychology of organizations, 2. Aufl., New York.

  • Kieser, Alfred/ Walgenbach, Peter (2007), Organisation, 5. Aufl., Stuttgart.

  • Lechner, Christoph/ Floyd, Steven W. (2007), Searching, Processing, Codifying and Practicing — Key Learning Activities in Exploratory Initiatives. Long Range Planning, Vol. 40, S. 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwak, Eugene/ Hylton, Lydia F. (1962), Interorganizational Analysis: A Hypothesis on Co-ordinating Agencies, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 6, S. 395–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, Gianni/ Baden-Fuller, Charles (1995), Creating a Strategic Center to Manage a Web of Partners, in: California Management Review, Vol. 37, S. 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G./ Lipparini, Andrea (1999), The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, S. 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, James G./ Simon, Herbert A. (1958), Organizations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, Hans-Christian (2004), Netzkompetenz in Supply Chains, 1. Aufl., Wiesbaden.

  • Pierce, Jon L./ Delbecq, Andre L. (1977), Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 2, S. 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, Joel M./ Page, Karen L. (1998), Network Forms of Organization, in: Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 24, S. 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W. (1990), Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization, in: Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, S. 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, Keith G./ Kenis, Patrick (2007), Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness, in: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 18, S. 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, Keith G./ Milward, H. Brinton (1995), A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, S. 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, Keith G./ Fish, Amy/ Sydow, Jörg (2007), Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 33, S. 479–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, Derek S./ Hickson, David J./ Hinings, C. Robert/ Turner, C. (1968), Dimensions of Organization Structure, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 13, S. 65–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raab, Jorg/ Kenis, Patrick (2009), Heading Toward a Society of Networks: Empirical Developments and Theoretical Challenges, in: Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 18, S. 198–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, Charles C. (1989), The comparative method, 1. Aufl., Berkeley.

  • Ring, Peter S./ van de Ven, Andrew H. (1992), Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, S. 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, Lori/ Schilling, Melissa A. (2007), Comparing alliance network structure across industries: observations and explanations, in: Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol. 1, S. 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilke, Oliver/ Wirtz, Bernd W. (2008), Allianzfähigkeit — Eine Analyse zur Operationalisierung und Erfolgswirkung im Kontext von F&E-Allianzen, in: zfbf, 60. Jg., S. 479–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, Herbert A. (1967), Innovation-Resisting and Innovation-Producing Organizations, in: The Journal of Business, Vol. 40, S. 470–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobrero, Maurizio/ Schrader, Stephan (1998), Structuring Inter-firm Relationships: A Metaanalytic Approach, in: Organization Studies, Vol. 19, S. 585–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, Jörg (1992), Strategische Netzwerke, 1. Aufl., Wiesbaden.

  • Sydow, Jörg (2010), Management von Netzwerkorganisationen: Zum Stand der Forschung, in: Sydow, Jörg (Hrsg.), Management von Netzwerkorganisationen, 5. Aufl., Wiesbaden, S. 373–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J. (1986), Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, in: Research Policy, Vol. 15, S. 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Victor A. (1965), Bureaucracy and Innovation, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 10, S. 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Raaij, Denise P. (2006), Norms Network Members Use: An Alternative Perspective for Indicating Network Success or Failure, in: International Public Management Journal, Vol. 9, S. 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, Michael A. (2001), Creativity and Innovation in Organizations, Management of, in: Smelser, Neil J./ Baltes, Paul B. (Hrsg.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Oxford, S. 2895–2900.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wildemann, Horst (1997), Koordination von Unternehmensnetzwerken, in: zfbf, 67. Jg., S. 417–439.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederik M. Metzger M.B.A..

Additional information

Die Verfasser danken einem anonymen Gutachter für hilfreiche Hinweise sowie dem BMBF für finanzielle Unterstützung im Forschungsprojekt ‚krea-nets‘.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metzger, F.M., Berwing, S., Armbrüster, T. et al. Koordinationsmechanismen und Innovativität von Netzwerken: eine empirische Analyse. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtsch Forsch 64, 428–455 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373697

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373697

JEL-Classification

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation