Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovationen in Prozesstechniken und Architekturen prozesstechnischer Systeme

  • Prozesstechnologie
  • Published:
Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Zentrale Aufgabenstellung der Produktionsstrategieentwicklung ist die Definition der prozesstechnologischen Unternehmensausrichtung. Mit dieser wird das Produktionsprogramm langfristig festgelegt; Fehlentscheidungen und mangelhafte System integration führen zu nachhaltigen Wettbewerbsnachteilen. Gestaltbar sind prozesstechnische Potenziale durch Veränderung der Prozesstechniken und der Relationen zwischen diesen. Auf Basis einer kausalanalytischen Untersuchung wird hinterfragt, welche systematischen Zusammenhänge zwischen Veränderungen im Prozesstechniksystem und dem Produktionsprogramm bestehen. Weiters werden die induzierten integrierenden Maßnahmen im prozesstechnologischen Wissenssystem von Produktion und F&E untersucht.

Abstract

The fundamental challenge in the field of manufacturing strategy management is to define the direction of technological development. That decision determines the firms manufacturing program in the long-term. Wrong decisions and inadequate integration of technologies causes significant loss of competitive advantage, or places a firm at a competitive disadvantage. There are different kinds of innovation to develop manufacturing systems goal-oriented. Individual manufacturing technology and/or linkages between manufacturing processes can be changed for these purposes. In this study, the relationships between changed manufacturing technologies respectively manufacturing system architectures and changes in product mix were examined. Furthermore the relationships between changed elements and architectures of manufacturing systems and induced changes in knowledge bases of Production and R&D were investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Acur, Nuran/ Gertsen, Frank/ Sun, Hongyi/ Frick, Jan (2003), The formalisation of manufacturing strategy and its influence on the relationship between competitive objectives, improvement goals, and action plans, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23, S. 1114–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Paul S. (1995), Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface, in: Organization Science, Vol. 6, S. 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, Allan N./ Bahram, Nik (1995), The hypercube of innovation, in: Research Policy, Vol. 24, S. 51–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Philip/ Tushman, Michael L. (1990), Technological diskontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change, in: Administrativ Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, S. 604–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, Klaus/ Erichson, Bernd/ Plinke, Wulff/ Weiber, Rolf (2003), Multivariate Analysemethoden, 10. Aufl., Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, Mary J./ Tushman, Michael (2002), Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 47, S. 676–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, Peter M. (1995), EQS Structural Equations Program Manual, Encino CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M./ McHugh Falbe, Cecilia/ McKinley, William/ Tracy, Phelps K. (1976), Technology and Organization in Manufacturing, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, S. 20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blecker, Thorsten/ Kaluza, Bernd (2003), Forschung zu Produktionsstrategien — Ergebnisse und Entwicklungsperspektiven, Diskussionsbeiträge des Instituts für Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universität Klagenfurt, No. 2003/05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blois, Keith J. (1986), Manufacturing Technology as a competitive weapon, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 19, S. 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth A. (1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth A./ Stine, Robert A. (1993), Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models, in: Bollen, Kenneth A./Long J. Scott (Hrsg.), Testing structural equation models, Newbury Park, S. 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, Peter/ Purcell, John (2003), Strategy and human resource management, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandyberry, Alan/ Rai, Arun/ White, Gregory P. (1999), Intermediate Performance Impacts of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Systems: An Empirical Investigation, in: Decision Sciences, Vol. 30, S. 993–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braßler, Axel/ Schneider, Herfried (2000), Strategisch-taktisches Produktionsmanagement, in: Schneider, Herfried (Hrsg.), Produktionsmanagement in kleineren und mittleren Unternehmen, Stuttgart, S. 21–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusoni, Stefano/ Prencipe, Andrea/ Pavitt, Keith (2001), Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More Than They Make?, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46, S. 597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castrillón, Diéguez Isabel/ Cantorna, Sinde Ana I. (2005), The effect of the implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies on training in the manufacturing sector, in: Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 29, S. 268–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M./ Levinthal, Daniel A. (1990), Absorptive Capacity: A new perspective on Learning and Innovation, in: Adminstrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, S. 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, Patrick J./West Stephen G./ Finch John F. (1996), The Robustness of Test Statistics to Nonnormality and Specification Error in Confirmatory Factor Analysis, in: Psychological Methods, Vol. 1, S. 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, Fabriborz/ Gopalakrishnan, Shanthi (2001), The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in Organizations, in: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 38, S. 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dangayach, G. S./ Deshmukh, S. G. (2001), Manufacturing Strategy. Literatur review and some issues, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21, S. 884–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj, Sarv/ Hollingworth, David G./ Schroeder, Roger G. (2004), Generic manufacturing strategies and plant performance, in: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 22, S. 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni (1982), Technological paradigms and technological trajectories, in: Research Policy, Vol. 11, S. 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, Werner H./ Kleinaltenkamp, Michael/ Reckenfelderbäumer, Martin (1993), Leistungsbündel als Absatzobjekte — Ein Ansatz zur Überwindung der Dichotomie von Sach- und Dienstleistungen, in: zfbf, 45. Jg., S. 395–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria, Ana/ Fenn, Paul/ Bruce, Alistair (2002), Determinants of adoption of flexible production technologies: Evidence from portuguese manufacturing industry, in: Economics of Innovation & New Technology, Vol. 11, S. 569–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, Erich/ Lehnen, Marc/ Valcárcel, Sylvia (1999), Leistungsindividualisierungen im Maschinenbau — Eine wettbewerbsstrategische Analyse, in: zfbf, 51. Jg., S. 883–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, Frederick H./ Wojan, Timothy R./ Olmsted, Jennifer C. (2002), Skills, Flexible Manufacturing Technology, and Work Organization, in: Industrial relations, Vol. 41, S. 48–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galunic, D. Charles/ Rodan, Simon (1998), Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, S. 1193–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, Raghu/ Nayyar, Praveen R. (1994), Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, S. 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert/ Tushman, Michael L./ Smith, Wendy/ Anderson, Philip (2002), A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics, in: Management Science, Vol. 48, S. 1103–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, Hans Georg/ Ritter, Thomas (2001), Der Einfluss der Strategie auf die Technologische Kompetenz, die Netzwerkkompetenz und den Innovationserfolg eines Unternehmens, in: Blecker, Thorsten/ Gemünden, Hans G. (Hrsg.), Innovatives Produktions- und Technologiemanagement, Berlin, S. 299–315.

  • Gerpott, Thorsten J. (2005), Strategisches Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement, 2. Aufl., Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, K. Abdul/ Jayabalan V. (2000), Advanced manufacturing technology and organizational change, in: Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 11, S. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, K. Abdul/ Jayabalan V./ Sugumar, M. (2002), Impact of advanced manufacturing technology on organizational structure, in: Journal of High Technology Management Research Vol. 13, S. 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, Shanthi (2000), Unraveling the links between dimensions of innovation and organizational performance, in: The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 11, S. 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, Shanthi/ Bierly, Paul/ Kessler, Eric H. (1999), A reexamination of product and process innovations using a knowledge-based view, in: The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 10, S. 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Robert T. (1996), Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol 17, S. 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, Henrich R./Taylor Alva (2000), Innovations as Catalysts for Organizational Change: Shifts in Organizational Cognition and Search, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, S. 54–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Atul/ Chen, I. J./ Chiang, D. (1997), Determining Organizational Structure Choices in Advanced Manufacturing Technology Management, in: Omega, The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 25, S. 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Yash P./ Lonial, Subhash C. (1998), Exploring linkages between manufacturing strategy, business strategy, and organizational strategy, in: Production and Operations Management, Vol. 7, S. 243–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Jeffrey S./ Hitt, Michael A./ Hoskisson, Robert E./ Ireland, R. Duane (2001), Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 27, S. 679–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, Jürgen/ Schlaak, Thomas M. (2001), Zur Messung des Innovationsgrades neuartiger Produkte, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 71. Jg., S. 161–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Rebecca M./ Clark, Kim B. (1990), Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms, in: Administrativ Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, S. 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Rebecca M./ Cockburn, Iain (1994), Measuring Competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, S. 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Terry (1985), Manufacturing Strategy, Basingstoke, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, Christian (1992), Die Kausalanalyse. Eine Einführung, in: Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 21. Jg., S. 499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, Christian/ Dobratz, Andreas (1998), Iterative Modellselektion in der Kausalanalyse, in: Hildebrandt, Lutz/ Homburg, Christian (Hrsg.), Die Kausalanalyse: ein Instrument der empirischen betriebswirtschaftlichen Forschung, Stuttgart, S. 447–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, Christian/ Hildebrandt, Lutz (1998), Die Kausalanalyse: Bestandsaufnahme, Entwicklungsrichtungen, Problemfelder, in: Hildebrandt, Lutz/ Homburg, Christian (Hrsg.), Die Kausalanalyse: ein Instrument der empirischen betriebswirtschaftlichen Forschung, Stuttgart, S. 15–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, Christian/ Klarmann, Martin (2006), Die Kausalanalyse in der empirischen betriebswirtschaftlichen Forschung — Problemfelder und Anwendungsempfehlungen, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, 66. Jg., S. 727–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, Christian/ Stock, Ruth/ Kühlborn, Sven (2006), Die Vermarktung von Systemen im Industriegütermarketing, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, 65. Jg., S. 537–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, Marco (1995), Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment, in: Research Policy, Vol. 24, S. 521–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, Marco (1997), From technological potential to product performance: an empirical analysis, in: Research Policy, Vol. 26, S. 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaluza, Bernd (1996), Dynamische Produktdifferenzierungsstrategie und moderne Produktionssysteme, in: Wildemann, Horst (Hrsg.), Produktions- und Zuliefernetzwerke, München, S. 193–238.

  • Kaluza, Bernd/ Blecker, Thorsten (2005), Flexibilität — State of the Art und Entwicklungstrends, in: Kaluza, Bernd/ Blecker, Thorsten (Hrsg.), Erfolgsfaktor Flexibilität, Berlin, S. 1–25.

  • Kathuria, Ravi/ Partovi, Fariborz Y. (2000), Aligning Work Force Management Practices with Competitive Priorities and Prozess Technology: A Conceptual Examination, in: The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 11, S. 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, David R./ Covin, Jeffrey G./ Hegarty, Harvey W. (2003), Complementary resources and the exploitation of technological innovations, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 29, S. 589–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Nigel/ Anderson, Neil (1995), Innovation and change in organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, Dorothy (1992), Core Capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, S. 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, Paul (1995), The Management of Technology — Perception and opportunities, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Robert M./ Mannari, Hiroshi (1981), Technology and Size as Determinants of the Organizational Structure of Japanese Factories, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, S. 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, Susan K./ Chakravarthy, Bala (2002), The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, S. 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2. Aufl., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, Sibylle I. (1997), Kundenbindung als Marketingziel: Identifikation und Analyse zentraler Determinanten, Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, Gary P. (1996), Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology, in: Research Policy, Vol. 25, S. 1097–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhyne, Lawrence C./ Teagarden, Mary B./ Lamb, Barbara L./ Amir, Kristine/ Powell, Steve/ Stevens, Stephen/ Wu, Jin Liang (1997), Technology-based competitive strategy: An empirical test of an integrative model, in: The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 8, S. 187–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomo, Sören (2003), Konzept und Messung des Innovationsgrades — Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie zu innovativen Entwicklungsvorhaben, in: Schwaiger, Manfred/ Harhoff, Dietmar (Hrsg.), Empirie und Betriebswirtschaft, Stuttgart, S. 399–427.

  • Satorra, Albert/ Bentler, Peter M. (1988a), Scaling corrections for Chi-Square statistics in covariance structure analysis, in: Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, S. 308–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, Albert/ Bentler, Peter M. (1988b), Scaling corrections for statistics in covariance structure analysis, UCLA Statistics Series, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, Albert/ Bentler, Peter M. (1994), Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis, in: Eye, Alexander/ Clogg, Clifford C. (Hrsg.), Latent Variable Analysis in Developmental Research, Thousand Oaks, S. 399–419.

  • Schermelleh-Engel, Karin/ Moosbrugger, Helfried/ Müller, Hans (2003), Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures, in: Methods of Psychological Research Online, Vol. 8, S. 23–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaak, Thomas M. (1999), Der Innovationsgrad als Schlüsselvariable: Perspektiven für das Management von Produktentwicklungen, Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, Hans-Horst (1999), Technologie- und Innovationsplanung, in: Corsten, Reiß (Hrsg.), Betriebswirtschaftslehre, 3. Aufl., München, S. 989–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, Roger G./ Bates, Kimberly A./ Junttila, Mikko A. (2002), A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, S. 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, Marcell (1994), Industrielle Fertigungswirtschaft, in: Schweitzer, Marcell (Hrsg.), Industriebetriebslehre, 2. Aufl., München, S. 569–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonetti, Roberto/ Archibugi, Daniele/ Evangelista, R. (1995), Product and process innovations: How are they defined? How are they quantified?, in: Scientometrics, Vol. 32, S. 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, Manuel E./ Eppinger, Steven D./ Rowles, Craig M. (2004), The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development, in: Management Science, Vol. 50, S. 1674–1689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistik Austria (2005), Statistisches Jahrbuch Österreich, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz, Nils/ Heine, Klaus (2007), Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, S. 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swink, Morgan/ Zeng, Dongsong (2000), NPD Complexity and technology novelty as antecedents of design-manufacturing integration: Effects on product design quality, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, S. A1–A6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J. (1996), Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation, in: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 31, S. 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschirky, Hugo (1998), Konzepte und Aufgaben des Integrierten Technologie-Managements, in: Tschirky, Hugo/ Koruna, Stefan (Hrsg.), Technologie-Management: Idee und Praxis, Zürich.

  • Tushman, Michael L./ Anderson, Philip (1986), Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments, in: Administrativ Science Quarterly, Vol. 31, S. 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, Michael L./Rosenkopf Lori (1992), Organizational Determinants of Technological Change, in: Research of Organisational Behavior, Vol. 14, S. 311–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Beverly B. (2001), The complementarity of cooperative and technological competencies: A reource-based perspective, in: Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 18, S. 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, James M./ Abernathy, William J. (1975), A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation, in: Omega, The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 3, S. 639–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, Stephen G./ Finch, John F./ Curran, Patrick J. (1995), Structural Equation Models With Nonnormal Variables, Problems and Remedies, in: Hoyle, Rick H. (Hrsg.), Structural equation modelling: concepts, issues, and applications, Thousand Oaks, California, S. 56–75.

  • Youndt, Mark A./ Snell, Scott A./ Dean Jr., James W./ Lepak, David P. (1996), Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, S. 836–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A./ Covin, Jeffrey G. (1993), Business Strategy, Technology Policy and Firm Performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, S. 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zäpfel, Günther (2000), Strategisches Produktions-Management, 2. Aufl., München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoltán, Bakay / Schwaiger, Manfred (2006), Kundenbindung im liberalisierten Strommarkt, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, 66. Jg., S. 326–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zotter, Karl-A. (2007), Entwicklung prozesstechnologischer Systeme in Unternehmungen, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Innovations- und Umweltmanagement, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Universitätsstraße 15/EF, 8010, Graz, Deutschland

    Karl-Andreas Zotter

Authors
  1. Karl-Andreas Zotter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Ich danke einem anonymen Gutachter für wertvolle Hinweise und Anregungen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zotter, KA. Innovationen in Prozesstechniken und Architekturen prozesstechnischer Systeme. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtsch Forsch 61, 582–602 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372824

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372824

JEL-Classification

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Search

Navigation