Abstract
In response to pressures to integrate literacy and science learning, an observational, comparative, analysis was conducted exploring the added value of blended science and literacy curricula over inquiry-oriented science curricula in two 2nd-grade classrooms (ages seven to eight). Data were collected over ten weeks by the research team, and statistically significant differences were found in favor of the blended curricula on measures of identity and student understanding of the nature of science (NOS) as well as conceptual understanding. Analyses of the reading, writing, and language use in both classrooms suggests several factors that may have contributed to these important differences in outcome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989).Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
Asimov, N. (2007, October 25). Science courses nearly extinct in elementary grades, study finds.San Francisco Chronicle, A-1.
Baker, L. (1991). Metacognition, reading, and science education. In C. M. Santa & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.),Science learning: Processes and applications (pp. 2–13). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Baker, L., & Saul, W. (1994). Considering science and language arts connections: A study of teacher cognition.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1023–1037.
Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brophy, J. (2004).Motivating students to learn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Duke, N. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade.Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.
Eckert, P. (1989).Jocks and burnouts. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gaskins, I. W., & Guthrie, J. T. (1994). Integrating instruction of science, reading, and writing: Goals, teacher development, and assessment.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1039–1056.
Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003).Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 689–703.
Girod, M. (2001).Teaching 5th grade science for aesthetic understanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Glaser, B. (1978).Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967).The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Glynn, S. M., & Muth, K. D. (1994). Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1057–1073.
Great explorations in math and science (GEMS). (2005). Lawrence Hall of Science website. Retrieved May 18, 2009, from http://lhsgems.org/aboutgems.html.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.),Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Guthrie, J. T., & Ozgungor, S. (2002). Instructional contexts for reading engagement. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.),Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 275–288). New York: The Guilford Press.
Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., et al. (2003). Message from the “Island Group”: What is literacy in science literacy?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 607–615.
Hapgood, S., & Palinscar, A. S. (2007). Where literacy and science intersect.Educational Leadership, 64(4), 56–60.
Keys, C. W. (1999). Language as an indicator of meaning generation: An analysis of middle school students’ written discourse about scientific investigations.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1044–1061.
Koballa, T. R., & Crawley, F. E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning.School Science and Mathematics, 85, 222–232.
Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching.American Educational Research Journal, 17, 29–64.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986).Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lave, J. (1988).Cognition in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.
Lemke, J. L. (1990).Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316.
Meichtry, Y. J. (1993). The impact of science, curricula on student views about the nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 429–443.
Padilla, M. J., Muth, K. D., & Padilla, R. K. (1991). Science and reading: Many process skills in common? In C. M. Santa & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.),Science learning: Processes and applications (pp. 14–19). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Palinscar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2001). The interplay of firsthand and text-based investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.),Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 151–194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Peacock, A. (2001). The potential impact of the “Literacy Hour” on the teaching of science from text material.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33, 25–42.
Peacock, A., & Weedon, H. (2002). Children working with text in science: Disparities with “Literacy Hour” practice.Research in Science & Technological Education, 20, 185–197.
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
Ramey-Gassert, L., & Shroyer, G. M. (1992). Enhancing science teaching self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers.Journal of Elementary, Science Education, 4, 26–34.
Reeve, J. (1996).Motivating others. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1992). A curriculum strategy that expands time for in-depth elementary science instruction by using science-based reading strategies: Effects of a year-long study in grade four.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 545–554.
Roth, W-M. McRobbie, C. J., Lucas, K. B., & Boutonné, S. (1997). Why may students fail to learn from demonstrations? A social practice perspective on learning in physics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 509–533.
Roth, W-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Towards a theory of representing as social practice.Review of Educational, Research, 68(1), 35–59.
Seeds of science: Roots of reading. (2006). Lawrence Hall of Science website. Retrieved May 18, 2009, from http://seedsofscience.org/about/index.html#approach.
Shepardson, D. P., & Britsch, S. J. (2001). The role of children’s journals in elementary school science activities.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 43–69.
Smith, F. (1988).Joining the literacy club. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Solomon, J., Scott, L., & Duveen, J. (1996). Large-scale exploration of pupils’ understanding of the nature of science.Science Education, 80, 493–508.
Vitale, M. R., & Romance, N. R. (2007). A knowledge-based framework for unifying content-use reading comprehension and reading comprehension strategies. In D. McNamara (Ed.),Reading comprehension strategies (pp. 73–104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Girod, M., Twyman, T. Comparing the added value of blended science and literacy curricula to inquiry-based science curricula in two 2nd-grade classrooms. J Elem Sci Edu 21, 13–32 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174720
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174720