Abstract
Observer-rating scales are used for the evaluation of drug trials in depression. One of the most widely used depression rating scales is still the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), which was developed at the time when the first antidepressants were becoming available. Due to its construction it seems to have a specific focus on drug effects of classical antidepressants. As a result of different methodological analyses such as principal component analysis, the Rasch model and facet analysis, a differentiation between core symptoms reflecting the severity of depression and additional symptoms describing other aspects of the symptomatology of depression seems meaningful. The use of the HAMD 6-item score, described primarily by Bech, as the main efficacy criterion in antidepressant drug trials gives a fair estimation of drug-induced changes of severity of depression and avoids bias such as the well-known bias of the HAMD total score in favour of tricyclic antidepressants. This is demonstrated by the evaluation of two sertraline-amitriptyline comparative studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bech P (1990) Psychometric developments of the Hamilton scales: the spectrum of depression, dysthymia, and anxiety. In: Bech P, Coppen A (eds) The Hamilton Scales. Springer, Berlin, pp 72–79
Bech P, Rafaelsen OJ (1980) The use of rating scales exemplified by a comparison of the Hamilton and Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 62 (Suppl 285): 128–131
Bech P, Gram LF, Dein E, Jacobsen O, Vitger J, Bolwig TG (1975) Quantitative rating of depressive states. Acta Psychiat Scand 51:161–170
Bech P, Allerup P, Gram LF, Reisby N, Rosenberg R, Jacobsen O, Nagy A (1981) The Hamilton depression scale. Evaluation of objectivity using logistic models. Acta Psychiatr Scand 63:290–299
Berrios GE, Bulbena-Villarasa A (1990) The Hamilton depression scale and the numerical description of the symptoms of depression. In: Bech P, Coppen A (eds) The Hamilton Scales. Springer, Berlin, pp 80–92
Borg I (1979) Some basic concepts of facet theory. In: Lingoes JC, Roskam EE, Borg I (eds) Geometric Representation of Relational Data. Mathesis Press, Arm Arbor, MI
Canter D (1985) Facet Theory. Approaches to Social Research. Springer, New York
Conti I, Cassano GB (1990) The impact of the Hamilton rating scale for depression on the development of a center for clinical psychophar-macology research. In: Bech P, Coppen A (eds) The Hamilton Scales. Springer, Berlin, pp 20–27
Coxon A (1982) The Users Guide to Multidimensional Scaling. Heinemann, London
Domken M, Scott J, Kelly P (1994) What factors predict discrepancies between self and observer ratings of depression? J Affect Disord 31: 253–259
Guttman L (1966) Order analysis of correlation matrices. In: Cattell RB (ed) Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL, pp 439–458
Guttman L (1967) The development of nonmetric space analysis: a letter to Professor John Ross. Multivariate Behavior Res 2: 71–82
Guttman L (1968) A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika 33: 469–506
Guttman L (1979) Smallest Space Analysis by the absolute value principle. In: Lingoes JC, Roskam EE, Borg I (eds) Geometric Representation of Relational Data. Mathesis Press, Ann Arbor, MI
Guy W (1976) ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology Revised. National Institute of Mental Health, Maryland
Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23:56–62
Hamilton M (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 6:278–296
Hamilton M (1976) Comparative value of rating scales. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1 (Suppl 1): 58–60
Hamilton M (1986) The Hamilton rating scale for depression. In: Sartorius N, Ban T (eds) Assessment of Depression. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 143–152
Hughes JR, O’Hara MW, Rehm LP (1982) Measurement of depression in clinical trials: an overview. J Clin Psychiatry 43:85–88
Lang F, Pellet J, Postic Y, Beau JM, Lancrenon S, Blanchon Y et al. (1991) Widlocher’s Depressive Retardation Scale and Montgomery Asberg’s Depression Rating Scale: an inter-rater study. Eur Psychiatry 6:47–52
Levy S (1981) Lawful roles of facets in social theories. In: Borg I (ed) Multidimensional Data Representation — When and why? Mathesis Press, Arm Arbor, MI, pp 65–107
Levy S (1985) Lawful roles of facets in social theory. In: Canter D (ed) Facet Theory. Approaches to Social Research. Springer, New York, pp 59–96
Lingoes JC (1979) Identifying regions in the space for interpretation. In: Lingoes JC, Roskam EE, Borg I (eds) Geometric Representation of Relational Data. Mathesis Press, Arm Arbor, MI, pp 16–24
Lingoes JC, Guttman C (1979) Nonmetric factor analysis: a rank reducing alternative to linear factor analysis. In: Lingoes JC, Roskam EE, Borg I (eds) Geometric Representation of Relational Data. Mathesis Press, Arm Arbor, MI, pp 98–104
Maier W (1990) The Hamilton depression scale and its alternatives: a comparison of their reliability and validity. In: Bech P, Coppen A (eds) The Hamilton Scales. Springer, Berlin, pp 64–71
Maier W, Philipp M (1985) Comparative analysis of observer depression scales. Acta Psychiatr Scand 72: 230–245
Möller HJ (1991) Outcome criteria in antidepressant drug trials: self-rating versus observer-rating scales. Pharmacopsychiat 24: 71–75
Möller HJ (2000) Rating depressed patients: observer- vs self-assessment. Eur Psychiatry 15:160–172
Möller HJ, von Zerssen D (1995) Self-rating procedures in the evaluation of antidepressants. Review of the literature and results of our studies. Psychopathology 28:291–306
Möller HJ, Berzewski H, Eckmann F, Gonzalves N, Kissling W, Knorr W, Ressler P, Rudolf GA, Steinmeyer EM, Magyar I et al. (1993) Double-blind multicenter study of paroxetine and amitriptyline in depressed inpatients. Pharmacopsychiatry 26:75–78
Möller HJ, Gallinat J, Hegerl U, Aratö M, Janka Z, Pflug B, Bauer H (1998) Double-blind, multicenter comparative study of sertraline and amitriptyline in hospitalized patients with major depression. Pharmacopsychiat 31:170–177
Möller HJ, Glaser K, Leverkus F, Göbel C (2000) Double-blind, multi-center comparative study of sertraline versus amitriptyline in outpatients with major depression. Pharmacopsychiat 33:206–212
Rasch G (1960) Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research, Copenhagen
Raveh A (1978) Finding periodical patterns in time series with monotone trend: a new technique. In: Shye S (ed) Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 371–390
Shye S (1978) Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
Snaith P (1993) What do depression rating scales measure? Br J Psychiatry 163: 293–298
Steiger JH, Schönemann PH (1978) A history of factor indeterminancy. In: Shye S (ed) Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 136–178
Steinmeyer EM, Möller HJ (1992) Facet theoretic analysis of the Hamilton-D scale. J Aff Disord 25:53–62
Walczak DD, Apter JT, Halikas JA, Borison RL, Carman JS, Post GL, Patrick R, Cohn JB, Cunningham LA, Rittberg B, Preskorn SH, Kang JS, Wilcox ChS (1996) The oral dose-effect relationship for fluvoxamine: a fixed-dose comparison against placebo in depressed outpatients. Ann Clin Psychiaty 8:139–151
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
For Professor Per Bech on the occasion of his 60th birthday. With many thanks for our close academic and personal collaboration.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Möller, HJ. Methodological aspects in the assessment of severity of depression by the Hamilton Depression Scale. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Nuerosci 251 (Suppl 2), 13–20 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03035121
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03035121