Skip to main content
Log in

Trends in cancer survival and mortality rates

  • Published:
Medical Oncology and Tumor Pharmacotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Survival, i.e. the time from report to cancer registry to death was studied for 591,456 cases of cancer diagnosedin vivo from 1960 to 1984. Ten years survival increased from 35 to 40%. Survival rates for women were higher than for men. Since 10 years survival almost suggests cure, lead time bias is assumed not to be a major factor. Nor are relaxed histological criteria, detecting non-fatal tumors, intensified microscopic examination, changes in the relative frequency of cancer types, or increasing numbers of elderly patients assumed to be major artefacts. In contrast, improved socio-economic and health status are. Early detection also improves survival in some cancer types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adami H-Oet al.: Increasing survival trend after cancer diagnosis in Sweden: 1960–1984.J natn Cancer Inst 81, 1640–1647 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mattsson B.: Cancer registration in Sweden. Studies on completeness and validity of incidence and mortality registers. PhD dissertation. University of Stockholm, Sweden (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hakulinen Tet al.:Suomalaisten syöpä. Alueittainen kehitys 1954–2008. Suomen Syöpärekisteri, Syöpätautien tutkimussäätö, Helsinki (1989).

  4. Philipp R, Hastings A, Briggs J, Sizer J.: are malignant melanoma time trends explained by changes in histopathological criteria for classifying pigmented skin lesions?J Epidem Comm Hlth 42, 14–16 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ringberg A. Palmer B, Linell F: The contralateral breast at reconstructive surgery after breast cancer Operation — a histopathological study.Breast Cancer Res Treatment 2, 151–161 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pontén J: Abnormal cell growth (neoplasia) and aging, in Finch C E and Hayflick L (eds):Handbook of the Biology of Aging, pp. 536–650. New York, Van Norstarnd Reinhold Company (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fransilla K O, Hanach H R: Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid in children and young adults.Cancer 58, 715–719, (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pontén J and Larsson L-G: Breast cancer. Critical overviews of natural history, etiology, molecular biology and screening by mammography.Int J Cancer 5, (1990).

  9. Hansson L-E, Bergström R, Sparén P and Adami H-O: The decline in the incidence of stomach cancer in Sweden 1960–1984: A birth cohort phenomenon.Int J Cancer 47, 499–503 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Devesa S A et al: Cancer incidence and mortality trends among whites in the United States, 1947-84.J natn Cancer but 79, 701–770 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tomatis L (ed):Cancer: Causes, Occurrence and Control, IARC Scientific Publications No. 100. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Young J L Jr, Ries L G, Pollack E S: Cancer patient survival among ethnic groups in the United States.J natn Cancer Inst 73, 341–352 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Munoz N, Correa P, Cuello C, Duque E: Histologic types of gastric carcinoma in high- and low-risk areas.Int J Cancer 3, 809–815 (1968).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergkvist L, Adami H-O, Persson I: Prognosis after breast cancer diagnosed in women exposed to estrogen and estrogen-progestogen replacement therapyAm J Epidemiol 130, 221–228 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins J, Doner A, Allen L H et al: Oestrogen use and survival in endometrial cancer.Lancet 2, 461–464 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stemmermann G N, Brown C: A survival study of intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma.Cancer 33, 1190–1195 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer, FIGO. Ed Folke Pettersson, Panorama Press AB, Stockholm, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shafir R, Hiss J, Tsur D, Bubis J J: The thin malignant melanoma. Changing patterns of epidemiology and treatment.Cancer 50, 817–819 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Phillips RKS, Hittinger R, Blesowsky L, Fry J S and Fielding L P: Large bowel cancer: Surgical pathology and its relationship to survival.Br J Surg 71, 604–610 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bailar J C III, Smith E M: Progress against cancer?N Engl J Med 314, 1226–1232 (1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rutqvist L-E, Mattsson B, Signomklao T: Cancer mortality trends in Sweden 1960–1986.Acta Oncol 28, 771 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Doll R: Progress against cancer: Are we winning the war?Acta Oncol 28, 611–621 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hakulinen T, Tenkanen L: Regression analysis of relative survival rates.Appl Stat 36, 309–317 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lenner P: The excess mortality rate. A useful concept in cancer epidemiology.Acta Oncol 29, 573–576 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pontén, J., Adami, HO. & Sparén, P. Trends in cancer survival and mortality rates. Med. Oncol. & Tumor Pharmacother. 8, 147–153 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987172

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987172

Key words

Navigation