Abstract
Backgrounds
Three dimensional MR Mammography (3D-MRM) can detect tumor extension more accurately than mammography or ultrasound. There are two shrinkage patterns observed by 3D-MRM after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Concentric shrinkage is a good indication for breast conserving surgery. On the other hand, a dendritic pattern was represent ductal spread. Therefore, we developed MRM guided mapping to aid BCS for tumors showing a dendritic pattern.
Methods
Fifteen patients consisting of 8 stage II (T>3.5 cm) cases and 7 stage Ma cases aged 39 to 61 years (mean 47-8 years) were treated with AT neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the aim of performing breast conserving surgery. All patients were examined by 3D-MRM before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast conserving surgery indications were determined by tumor volume reduction and shrinkage patterns on 3D-MRM. Supine position mapping using MRM was performed for dendritic type tumors. FDG-PET was simultaneously performed for one case with bilateral breast cancer.
Results
Breast conserving surgery was performed for 13 of the 15 cases. One case underwent re-operating and mastectomy because of a positive margin. One case had microscopically positive margin and received boost radiation. Therefore, 11 of 15 cases (73.3%) underwent BCS and achieved negative margins under MRM guidance. PET scanning can detect residual tumor and occult metastasis but it is not suitable for mapping because of its spatial resolution.
Conclusions
3D-MRM is a useful modality to select appropriate cases for breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FDG-PET can also detect residual tumor or occult metastasis but it may not be suitable for mapping. Because both examinations have potential, further evaluation of their clinical efficacy is necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- 3D-MRM:
-
Three dimensional magnetic resonance mammography
- FDG-PET:
-
F-fluorodexyglucose positron emission tomography
- BCS:
-
Breast conserving surgery
References
Peoples GE, Regan Q, Heaton KM,et al: Breast conservation therapy for large primary and locally advanced breast cancers after induction chemotherapy.Ann Surg Oncol 1999.
Stebbg J, Gaya A: The evidence-based use of induction chemotherapy in breast cancer.Breast Cancer 18: 23–37, 2001.
Asher M, Jones P, Prosnitz L,et al: Local failure and margin status I early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy.Ann Surg 218: 22–28, 1993.
Fortin A, Larochelle M, Laverdiere J,et al: Lacal failure is responsible for the decrease insurvival for patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.J Clin Oncl 17: 10–109, 1999.
Nakamura S, Sugiura S. Nishio Tet al: Three dimensional MRI for indication of breast conserving surgery. XXX World Congress of the International College of Surgeons (abstr). 1507–1511, 1996.
Vinnicombe SJ, MacVicar AD, Guy RL,et al: Primary Breast Cancer: mammographic changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with pathological correlation.Ridiology 198: 333–340, 1996.
Harms SE: Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Seminars in CT and MRI 19: 104–120, 1998.
Harms SE: Integration of breast magnetic resonance imaging with breast cancer treatment.Topics in Magnetic resonance imaging 9: 79–91, 1998.
Abraham DC, Jones RC, Jones SE,et al: Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging.Cancer 78: 91–100, 1996.
Bassa P, Kim EE, Inoue T,et al: Evaluation of preoperative chemotherapy using PET with fluorine-18-fluo-rodeoxyglucose in breast cancer.J Nucl Med 37: 931–938, 1996.
Wahl RL, Zasadny K, Helvie M,et al: Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation.J Clin Oncol 11: 2101–2111, 1993.
Jensson T, Westlin JE, Ahlstrom H,et al: Positron emission tomography studies in patients with locally advanced and/or metastic breast cancer: a method forearly therapy evaluation?J Clin Oncol 13: 1470–1477, 1995.
Moon DH, Maddahi J, Silverman DH,et al: Accuracy of whole-body fluorine-18-FDG-PET for the detection of recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma.J Nucl Med 39: 431–435, 1998.
Crippa F, Agresti R, Seregni E,et al: Prospective evaluation of fluorine-18-FDG PET in presurgical staging of the axillar in breast cancer.J Nucl Med 39: 4–8, 1998.
Minn H, Soini I: [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose scintigraphy in diagnosis and follow up of treatment in advanced breast cancer.Eur J Nucl Med. 15: 61–66, 1998.
Oshida M, Uno K, Suzuki M,et al: Predicting the prognoses of breast carcinoma patients with positoron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-fluoro[18F]-D-glu-cose.Cancer 82: 2227–2234, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Reprint requests to Seigo Nakamura, Department of Surgery, St. Luke’s International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104–0044, Japan.
About this article
Cite this article
Nakamura, S., Kenjo, H., Nishio, T. et al. 3D-MR mammography-guided breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Clinical results and future perspectives with reference to FDG-PET. Breast Cancer 8, 351–354 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967536
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967536