Abstract
The growth changes of cotyledons, leaves, hypocotyls and roots due to photoperiodic induction in short day plantChenopodium rubrum were investigated in relation to flowering. Six-day old plants were induced by photoperiods with a different number of dark hours. We found that the degree of inhibition which occurred during induction in the growth of leaves, cotyledons and roots similarly as the stimulation of hypocotyl is proportional to the length of dark period. The photoperiods with 12, 16 and 20 dark hours bring about marked inhibition of growth and at the same time induce flowering in terminal and axillary meristems. The inhibitory effect of critical period for flowering,i.e. 8 dark hours, is not apparent in all criteria used and even the flower differentiation is retarded. The photoperiods of 4 and 6 dark hours did not affect growth and were ineffective in inducing flowering even if their number has been increased. The experiments with inductive photoperiod interrupted by light break have clearly shown that growth pattern characteristic for induced plants can be evoked in purely vegetative ones. Such statement did not exclude the possible importance of growth inhibition as a modifying factor of flower differentiation. We demonstrated that the early events of flower bud differentiation are accompanied by stimulation of leaf growth. The evaluation of growth and development of axillary buds at different nodes of insertion enabled us to quantify the photoperiodic effect and to detect the effects due to differences in dark period length not exceeding 2 hours.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beewer, J. E., Woolhouse, H. W.: Changes in the growth of roots and shoots whenPerilla frutescens L. Britt. is induced to flower. - J. exp. Bot.26: 451–463, 1975.
Bünning, E., Konder, M.: Tageslange, Blattwachstum und Blütenbildung. - Planta44: 9 to 17, 1954.
Cook, R. E.: The pattern of reproductive development inChenopodium rubrum L. - J. exp. Bot.27: 541–553, 1976.
Galun, E.: The role of auxine in the sex expression in the cucumber. - Physiol. Plant.12: 48 to 60, 1959.
Humphries, E. C.: Leaf growth of white mustard (Sinapis alba) in different environments. - Planta72: 223–231, 1967.
Krekule, J.: Stimulation and inhibition of flowering: morphological and physiological studies. - In: Coll. Int. CNRS 285. La Physiologie de la Floraison. Pp. 19–58. Paris 1979.
Lyndon, R. F.: A modification of flowering and phyllotaxis inSilene. - Ann. Bot.43: 553–558, 1979.
Schwabe, W. W.: Effect on natural and artificial light in arctic latitudes on long and short day plants as revealed by growth analysis. - Ann. Bot.20: 558–622, 1956.
Seidlová, F.: Growth correlation and RNA synthesis in different parts of the shoot apical meristem ofChenopodium rubrum. - Biol. Plant.18: 19–25, 1976.
Seidlová, F., Opatrná, J.: Change of growth correlations in the shoot meristem as the cause of age dependence of flowering inChenopodium rubrum. - Z. Pflanzenphysiol.89: 377–392, 1978.
Sladký, Z.: The application of growth regulators for physiological emasculation of rye (Secale cereale L.) flowers. -Biol. Plant.12: 388–394, 1970.
Teltscherová, L., Opatrná, J., Pleskotová, D.: Investigation of the endogenous rhythm of flowering inChenopodium rubrum L. - Biol. Plant.16: 341–347, 1974.
Thomas, R.: Promotion of leaf growth by short days in the short-day plantChenopodium amaranticolor. - Nature186: 1109, 1960.
Thomas, R.: Correlations between growth and flowering inChenopodium amaranticolor. II. Leaf and stem growth. - Ann. Bot.25: 255–269, 1961.
Ullmann, J., Opatrná, J., Krekule, J., Pavlová, L.: The changes in the growth pattern of organs ofChenopodium rubrum photoperiodically induced to flowering. - Biol. Plant.22: 374–383, 1980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Opatrná, J., Ullmann, J., Pavlová, L. et al. Changes in organ growth ofChenopodium rubrum due to suboptimal and multiple photoperiodic cycles with and without flowering effect. Biol Plant 22, 454–464 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02880486
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02880486