Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in organ growth ofChenopodium rubrum due to suboptimal and multiple photoperiodic cycles with and without flowering effect

  • Orginal Papers
  • Published:
Biologia Plantarum

Abstract

The growth changes of cotyledons, leaves, hypocotyls and roots due to photoperiodic induction in short day plantChenopodium rubrum were investigated in relation to flowering. Six-day old plants were induced by photoperiods with a different number of dark hours. We found that the degree of inhibition which occurred during induction in the growth of leaves, cotyledons and roots similarly as the stimulation of hypocotyl is proportional to the length of dark period. The photoperiods with 12, 16 and 20 dark hours bring about marked inhibition of growth and at the same time induce flowering in terminal and axillary meristems. The inhibitory effect of critical period for flowering,i.e. 8 dark hours, is not apparent in all criteria used and even the flower differentiation is retarded. The photoperiods of 4 and 6 dark hours did not affect growth and were ineffective in inducing flowering even if their number has been increased. The experiments with inductive photoperiod interrupted by light break have clearly shown that growth pattern characteristic for induced plants can be evoked in purely vegetative ones. Such statement did not exclude the possible importance of growth inhibition as a modifying factor of flower differentiation. We demonstrated that the early events of flower bud differentiation are accompanied by stimulation of leaf growth. The evaluation of growth and development of axillary buds at different nodes of insertion enabled us to quantify the photoperiodic effect and to detect the effects due to differences in dark period length not exceeding 2 hours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beewer, J. E., Woolhouse, H. W.: Changes in the growth of roots and shoots whenPerilla frutescens L. Britt. is induced to flower. - J. exp. Bot.26: 451–463, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bünning, E., Konder, M.: Tageslange, Blattwachstum und Blütenbildung. - Planta44: 9 to 17, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. E.: The pattern of reproductive development inChenopodium rubrum L. - J. exp. Bot.27: 541–553, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galun, E.: The role of auxine in the sex expression in the cucumber. - Physiol. Plant.12: 48 to 60, 1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, E. C.: Leaf growth of white mustard (Sinapis alba) in different environments. - Planta72: 223–231, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krekule, J.: Stimulation and inhibition of flowering: morphological and physiological studies. - In: Coll. Int. CNRS 285. La Physiologie de la Floraison. Pp. 19–58. Paris 1979.

  • Lyndon, R. F.: A modification of flowering and phyllotaxis inSilene. - Ann. Bot.43: 553–558, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwabe, W. W.: Effect on natural and artificial light in arctic latitudes on long and short day plants as revealed by growth analysis. - Ann. Bot.20: 558–622, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidlová, F.: Growth correlation and RNA synthesis in different parts of the shoot apical meristem ofChenopodium rubrum. - Biol. Plant.18: 19–25, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidlová, F., Opatrná, J.: Change of growth correlations in the shoot meristem as the cause of age dependence of flowering inChenopodium rubrum. - Z. Pflanzenphysiol.89: 377–392, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sladký, Z.: The application of growth regulators for physiological emasculation of rye (Secale cereale L.) flowers. -Biol. Plant.12: 388–394, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teltscherová, L., Opatrná, J., Pleskotová, D.: Investigation of the endogenous rhythm of flowering inChenopodium rubrum L. - Biol. Plant.16: 341–347, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R.: Promotion of leaf growth by short days in the short-day plantChenopodium amaranticolor. - Nature186: 1109, 1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R.: Correlations between growth and flowering inChenopodium amaranticolor. II. Leaf and stem growth. - Ann. Bot.25: 255–269, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, J., Opatrná, J., Krekule, J., Pavlová, L.: The changes in the growth pattern of organs ofChenopodium rubrum photoperiodically induced to flowering. - Biol. Plant.22: 374–383, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Opatrná, J., Ullmann, J., Pavlová, L. et al. Changes in organ growth ofChenopodium rubrum due to suboptimal and multiple photoperiodic cycles with and without flowering effect. Biol Plant 22, 454–464 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02880486

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02880486

Additional index words

Navigation