Skip to main content
Log in

Bateman’s principle and plant reproduction: The role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bateman’s principle states that male fitness is usually limited by the number of matings achieved, while female fitness is usually limited by the resources available for reproduction. When applied to flowering plants this principle leads to the expectation that pollen limitation of fruit and seed set will be uncommon. However, if male searching for mates (including pollen dissemination via external agents) is not sufficiently successful, then the reproductive success of both sexes (or both sex functions in hermaphroditic plants) will be limited by number of matings rather than by resources, and Bateman’s principle cannot be expected to apply. Limitation of female success due to inadequate pollen receipt appears to be a common phenomenon in plants. Using published data on 258 species in which fecundity was reported for natural pollination and hand pollination with outcross pollen, I found significant pollen limitation at some times or in some sites in 159 of the 258 species (62%). When experiments were performed multiple times within a growing season, or in multiple sites or years, the statistical significance of pollen limitation commonly varied among times, sites or years, indicating that the pollination environment is not constant. There is some indication that, across species, supplemental pollen leads to increased fruit set more often than increased seed set within fruits, pointing to the importance of gamete packaging strategies in plant reproduction. Species that are highly self-incompatible obtain a greater benefit relative to natural pollination from artificial application of excess outcross pollen than do self-compatible species. This suggests that inadequate pollen receipt is a primary cause of low fecundity rates in perennial plants, which are often self-incompatible. Because flowering plants often allocate considerable resources to pollinator attraction, both export and receipt of pollen could be limited primarily by resource investment in floral advertisement and rewards. But whatever investment is made is attraction, pollinator behavioral stochasticity usually produces wide variation among flowers in reproductive success through both male and female functions. In such circumstances the optimal deployment of resources among megaspores, microspores, and pollinator attraction may often require more flowers or more ovules per flower than will usually be fertilized, in order to benefit from chance fluctuations that bring in large number of pollen grains. Maximizing seed set for the entire plant in a stochastic pollination environment might thus entail a packaging strategy for flower number or ovule number per flower that makes pollen limitation of fruit or seed set likely. Pollen availability may limit female success in individual flowers, entire plants (in a season or over a lifetime), or populations. The appropriate level must be distinguished depending on the nature of the question being addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ackerman, J. D. 1989. Limitations to sexual reproduction inEncyclia krugerii (Orchidaceae). Syst. Bot.14:101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &A. M. Montalvo. 1990. Short- and long-term limitations to fruit production in a tropical orchid. Ecology71:263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &J. C. Montero Oliver. 1985. Reproductive biology ofOncidium variegatum: moon phases, pollination and fruit set. Amer. Orchid Soc. Bull.54:326–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ågren, J. 1989. Seed size and number inRubus chamaemorus: between-habitat variation, and effects of defoliation and supplemental pollination. J. Ecol.77:1080–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &D. W. Schemske. 1991. Pollination by deceipt in a neotropical monoecious herb,Begonia involucrata. Biotropica23:235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &M. F. Willson. 1992. Determinants of seed production inGeranium maculatum. Oecologia92:177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, H. M. 1987. Pollination limitation in a population ofSilene alba infected by the anther-smutUstilago violacea. J. Ecol.75:771–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. F. H. &T. W. Hoekstra. 1992. Toward a Unified Ecology. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aluri, R. J. S. 1990. The explosive pollination mechanism and mating system of the weedyHyptis suaveolens (Lamiaceae). Pl. Spec. Biol.5:235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C. &M. H. Beare. 1983. Breeding system and pollination ecology ofTrientalis borealis (Primulaceae). Amer. J. Bot.70:408–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1988. Size-dependent pollination efficiency inAnchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae): causes and consequences. Oecologia76:125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. The evolution of self-fertility inCrepis tectorum (Asteraceae). Pl. Syst. Evol.168:227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. M. 1982. Pollination, predation, and seed set inLinaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). Amer. Midl. Naturalist107:360–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, M. T. K. &P. Uslar. 1993. Breeding systems in a temperate mediterranean-type climate montane sclerophyllous forest in central Chile. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.111:83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augspurger, C. K. &K. P. Hogan. 1983. Wind dispersal of fruits with variable seed number in a tropical tree (Lonchcarpus pentaphyllus: Leguminosae). Amer. J. Bot.70:1031–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. A. 1980. The reproductive biology ofErythronium propullans Gray and sympatric populations ofE. albidum Nutt. (Liliaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club107:181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. C. H. 1980. Sexual reproduction inEichornia crassipes (water hyacinth) II. Seed production in natural populations. J. Appl. Ecol.17:113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &K. Helenurm. 1987. The reproductive biology of boreal forest herbs. I. Breeding systems and pollination. Canad. J. Bot.65:2036–2046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. 1948 Intra-sexual selection inDrosophila. Heredity2:349–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, K. S. 1974. Breeding systems of tree species of a lowland tropical community. Evolution28:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &J. H. Beach. 1981. Evolution of sexual systems in flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.68:254–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &C. J. Webb. 1984. Flower, fruit and seed abortion in tropical forest trees: implications for the evolution of paternal and maternal reproductive patterns. Amer. J. Bot.71:736–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proc. Roy. Soc. LondonB224:223–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,L. Lefebvre, L.-A. Giraldeau &D. Weary. 1984. Partial preferences of insects for the male flowers of an annual herb. Oecologia64:287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benseler, R. W. 1975. Floral biology of California buckeye. Madroño23:41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, P. E. &R. N. Calvo. 1989. Wind pollination, self-incompatibility, and altitudinal shifts in pollination systems in the high Andean genusEspeletia (Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot.76:1602–1614.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1991. Pollinator limitation and position dependent fruit set in the high Andean orchidMyrosmodes cochleare (Orchidaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol.174:93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, R. I. 1982a. Floral biology, hummingbird pollination and fruit production of trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans, Bignoniaceae). Amer. J. Bot.69:122–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982b. The ecology of sex expression in red buckeye. Ecology63:445–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1988. Paternity in plants. Pages 30–59in J. Lovett Doust and L. Lovett Doust, (eds.), Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &O. D. V. Sholes. 1993. Weather, pollination and the phenology ofGeranium maculatum. Amer. Midl. Naturalist129:52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierzychudek, P. 1981. Pollinator limitation of plant reproductive effort. Amer. Naturalist117:838–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, J. 1992. Floral biology and pollinators of three co-occurringCistus species (Cistaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc.109:39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyles, S. B. &R. Wyatt. 1990. Paternity analysis in a natural population ofAsclepias exaltata: multiple paternity, functional gender, and the “pollen-donation hypothesis.” Evolution44:1454–1468.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. The breeding system ofZephyranthes atamasco (Amaryllidaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club118:137–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burd, M. 1994. Ovule packaging in stochastic pollination and fertilization environments. Evolution (in press).

  • — &G. Head. 1992. Phenological aspects of male and female function in hermaphroditic plants. Amer. Naturalist140:305–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, R. N. 1990. Four-year growth and reproduction ofCyclopogon cranichoides (Orchidaceae) in South Florida. Amer. J. Bot.77:736–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. Evolutionary demography of orchids: intensity and frequency of pollination and the cost of fruiting. Ecology74:1033–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. R. 1985. Pollinator sharing and seed set of Stellariapubera: competition for pollination. Ecology66:544–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness inIpomopsis aggregata. Amer. Naturalist137:713–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &K. J. Halama. 1993. Resource and pollen limitation to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology74:1043–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,N. M. Waser, M. V. Price, E. A. Lynch &R. J. Mitchell. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: pollen export and flower corolla width inIpomopsis aggregata. Evolution45:1458–1467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. E. 1991. Sexual dimorphism and fruit production in a dioecious understory tree,Ilex opaca.Oecologia 85:381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,E. A. Powell &D. W. Kyhos. 1986. Self-incompatibility in the Hawaiian Madiinae (Compositae): an exception to Baker’s rule. Evolution40:430–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, B. B. 1983. The efficiency of pollen transfer and rates of embryo initiation inCryptantha (Boraginaceae). Oecologia59:262–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, D. 1989. Evolution of low female fertility in plants: pollen limitation, resource allocation, and genetic load. Trends Ecol. Evol.4:289–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &B. Charlesworth. 1987. The effect of investment in attractive structures on allocation to male and female functions in plants. Evolution41:948–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. L. 1979. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.76:2480–2484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — &J. J. Bull. 1986. Sex allocation, pollinator attraction and fruit dispersal in cosexual plants. J. Theor. Biol.118:321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1991. The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. &R. Dukas. 1990. The optimal number of female flowers and the fruits-to-flowers ratio in plants under pollination and resources limitation. Amer. Naturalist135:218–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, F. R. &D. H. Firmage. 1984. The floral ecology ofPlantanthera blephariglottis. Amer. J. Bot.71:700–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copland, B. J. &R. J. Whelan. 1989. Seasonal variation in flowering intensity and pollination limitation of fruit set in four co-occurringBanksia species. J. Ecol.77:509–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crome, F. H. J. &A. K. Irvine. 1986. “Two bob each way”: the pollination and breeding system of the Australian rain forest treeSyzygium cormiflorum (Myrtaceae). Biotropica18:115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruzan, M. B. 1990. Pollen-pollen and pollen-style interactions during pollen tube growth inErythronium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Amer. J. Bot.77:116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,P. R. Neal &M. F. Willson. 1988. Floral display inPhyla incisa: consequences for male and female reproductive success. Evolution42:505–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira, P. E. A. M. &M. Sazima. 1990. Pollination biology of two species ofKielmeyera (Guttiferae) from Brazilian cerrado vegetation. Pl. Syst. Evol.172:35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delph, L. F. &C. M. Lively. 1992. Pollinator visitation, floral display, and nectar production of the sexual morphs of a gynodioecious shrub. Oikos63:161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, B. &A. G. Stephenson. 1987. Sexual variations among plants of a perfect-flowered species. Amer. Naturalist130:199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, T. A. &J. B. Phipps. 1986. Studies inCrataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae) XIV. The breeding system ofCrataegus crus-galli sensu lato in Ontario. Amer. J. Bot.73:116–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieringer, G. 1992. Pollinator limitation in populations ofAgalinis strictifolia (Scrophulariaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club119:131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole, J. &K. Ritland. 1993. Inbreeding depression in twoMimulus taxa measured by multigenerational changes in the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution47:361–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudash, M. R. 1993. Variation in pollen limitation among individuals ofSabatia angularis (Gentianaceae). Ecology74:959–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulberger, R., A. Levy &D. Palevitch. 1981. Andromonoecy inSolanum marginatum. Bot. Gaz.142:259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlén, J. 1992. Proximate limits to seed production in a herbaceous perennial legume,Lathyrus vernus. Ecology73:1820–1831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elam, D. R. &Y. B. Linhart. 1988. Pollination and seed production inIpomopsis aggregata: differences among and within flower color morphs. Amer. J. Bot.75:1262–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, O.1987. Regulation of seed-set and gender variation in the hermaphroditic plantPotentilla anserina. Oikos49:165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feil, J. P. 1992. Reproductive ecology of dioeciousSiparuna (Monimiaceae) in Ecuador—a case of gall midge pollination. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.110:171–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger, P. 1983. Coevolution and pollination. Pages 282–310in D. J. Futuyma and M. Slatkin (eds.), Coevolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,G. Murray, S. Kinsman &W. H. Busby. 1986. Floral neighborhood and pollination success in four hummingbird-pollinated cloud forest species. Ecology67:449–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firmage, D. H. &F. R. Cole. 1988. Reproductive success and inflorescence size ofCalopogon tuberosus (Orchidaceae). Amer. J. Bot.75:1371–1377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, L. B. &W. Moser. 1985. Flowering phenology, floral display and reproductive success in dioeciousAralia nudicaulis L. (Araliaceae). Oecologia68:23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. F. 1992. Pollen limitation of reproductive effort in willows. Oecologia90:283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankie, G. W., P. A. Opler &K. J. Bawa. 1976. Foraging behavior of solitary bees: implications for outcrossing of a neotropical forest tree species. J. Ecol.64:1049–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen, C. 1985. Regulation of seed-set inPolemonium viscosum: floral scents, pollination, and resources. Ecology66:792–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &M. L. Stanton. 1989. Bumble bee pollination and floral morphology: factors influencing pollen dispersal in the alpine sky pilot,Polemonium viscosum. Amer. J. Bot.76:419–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganders, F. R. 1975. Fecundity in distylous and self-incompatible homostylous plants ofMitchella repens (Rubiaceae). Evolution29:186–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garwood, N. C. &C. C. Horvitz. 1985. Factors limiting fruit and seed production of a temperate shrub,Staphylea trifolia L. (Staphyleaceae). Amer. J. Bot.72:453–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geber, M. A. 1985. The relationship of plant size to self-pollination inMertensia ciliata. Ecology66:762–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldingay, R. L. &R. J. Whelan. 1990. Breeding system and tests for pollen limitation in two species ofBanksia. Austral. J. Bot.38:63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorchov, D. L. 1988. Effects of pollen and resources on seed number and other fitness components inAmelanchier arborea (Rosaceae: Maloideae). Amer. J. Bot.75:1275–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R. S. &P. A. Werner. 1983. Relationships among flowering phenology, insect visitors, and seed set of individuals: experimental studies on four co-occurring species of goldenrod (Solidago: Compositae). Ecol. Monogr.53:95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne, D. T. 1991. Sexual competition among females: what causes courtship-role reversal? Trends Ecol. Evol.6:118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, W. A. &G. W. Frankie. 1982. Pollination ofLuehea (Tiliaceae) in Costa Rican deciduous forest. Ecology63:1740–1750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig, D. &M. Westoby. 1988. On limits to seed production. Amer. Naturalist131:757–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainsworth, F. R., L. L. Wolf &T. Mercier. 1985. Pollen limitation in a monocarpic species,Ipomopsis aggregata. J. Ecol.73:263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, G. L. 1981. Flower color polymorphism and pollination biology ofPlatystemon californicus Benth. (Papaveraceae). Amer. J. Bot.68:233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder, L. D. &J. D. Thomson. 1989. Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. Amer. Naturalist133:323–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,M. B. Cruzan &R. S. Unnasch. 1985. Sexual reproduction and variation in floral morphology in an ephemeral vernal lily,Erythronium americanum. Oecologia67:286–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heithaus, E. R., P. A. Opler &H. G. Baker. 1974. Bat activity and pollination of Bauhiniapauletia: plant-pollinator coevolution. Ecology55:412–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, J. 1991. The reproductive biology of a riparian Mediterranean shrub,Nerium oleander L. (Apocynaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc.106:147–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiirsalmi, H. 1969.Trientalis europaea L. A study of the reproductive biology, ecology and variation in Finland. Ann. Bot. Fennici6:119–173.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. T. 1992. Functional dioecy inEchinocereus coccineus (Cactaceae): breeding system, sex ratios, and geographic range of floral dimorphism. Amer. J. Bot.79:1382–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K. P. 1983. The pollination biology and breeding system ofAplectrum hyemale (Orchidaceae). Canad. J. Bot.61:1906–1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtsford, T. P. 1985. Nonfruiting hermaphroditic flowers ofCalochortus leichtlinii (Liliaceae): potential reproductive functions. Amer. J. Bot.72:1687–1694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, M. A., H. P. Linder &W. J. Bond. 1992. Efficacy of wind pollination: pollen load size and natural microgametophyte populations in wind-pollinatedStaberoha banksii (Restionaceae). Amer. J. Bot.79:443–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, C. C. &D. W. Schemske. 1988. A test of the pollinator limitation hypothesis for a neotropical herb. Ecology69:200–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S. K. 1976. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.7:469–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. H., P. de Vries, D. E. Gladstone, M. L. Higgins &T. M. Lewishon. 1980. Self and cross-pollination ofEncyclia cordigera (Orchidaceae) in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica. Biotropica12:72–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennersten, O. 1988. Pollination inDianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conservation Biol.2:359–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,L. Berg &C. Lehman. 1988. Physiological differences in pollinator visitation, pollen deposition and seed set in the sticky catchfly,Viscarla vulgaris. J. Ecol.76:1111–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A. 1992. Pollination and reproductive ecology of acuña cactus,Echinomastus erectrocentrus var.acunensis (Cactaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci.153:400–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. O. 1991. Pollen limitation of female reproduction inLobelia cardinalis andL. siphilitica. Ecology72:1500–1503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, K. 1992. Pollinator limitation in the facultatively autogamous annual,Lupinus nanus (Leguminosae). Amer. J. Bot.79:49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevan, P. G. 1972. Insect pollination of high arctic flowers. J. of Ecol.60:831–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikuzawa, K. 1989. Floral biology and evolution of gynodioecism inDaphne kamtchatica var.jezoensis. Oikos56:196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &N. Mizui. 1990. Flowering and fruiting phenology ofMagnolia hypoleuca. Pl. Spec. Biol.5:255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimata, M. 1978. Comparative studies on the reproductive systems ofMazus japonicus andM. miquelii (Scrophulariaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol.129:243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koptur, S. 1984. Outcrossing and pollinator limitation of fruit set: breeding systems of neotropicalInga trees (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae). Evolution38:1130–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin, W. E. 1992. Density and reproductive success in wild populations ofDiplotaxis erucoides (Brassicaceae). Oecologia91:129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, M. M. &O. Jennersten. 1986. The significance of pollination time and frequency and of purity of pollen loads for seed set inRhinanthus angustifolius (Scrophulariaceae) andViscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). Oecologia70:502–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. Bumblebee visitation and seed set inMelampyrum pratense andViscaria vulgaris: heterospecific pollen and pollen limitation. Oecologia86:99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, W. S. 1993. Resource and pollen limitation: plant size-dependent reproductive patterns inPhysalis longifolia. Amer. Naturalist141:296–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. D. 1984. Effects of seed number per fruit on seed dispersal inCassia fasciculata (Caesalpinaceae). Bot. Gaz.145:136–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. Patterns of fruit and seed production in a Vermont population ofCassia nictitans L. (Caesalpinaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club116:15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &F. A. Bazzaz. 1982. Regulation of fruit and seed production in an annual legume,Cassia fasciculata. Ecology63:1363–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitan, D. R. 1993. The importance of sperm limitation to the evolution of egg size in marine invertebrates. Amer. Naturalist141:517–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. G. 1987. Allocations to pollen, seeds, and pollination mechanisms in self-fertilizing plants. Func. Ecol.1:83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &D. L. Venable. 1992. Some properties of natural selection with single and multiple constraints. Theor. Populat. Biol.41:90–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &M. S. Wells. 1992. Reproductive biology of a primitive angiosperm,Pseudowintera colorata (Winteraceae), and the evolution of pollination systems in the Anthophyta. Pl. Syst. Evol.181:77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers, A. E. &N. L. Christensen. 1986. Intraseasonal variation in seed production among flowers and plants ofThalictrum thalictroides (Ranunculaceae). Amer. J. Bot.73:190–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manasse, R. S. &K. Pinney. 1991. Limits to reproductive success in a partially self-incompatible herb: fecundity depression at serial life-cycle stages. Evolution45:712–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, H. B. &D. R. Whitney. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat.18:50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. L. &N. C. Ellstrand. 1988. Effective mate choice in wild radish: evidence for selective seed abortion and its mechanism. Amer. Naturalist131:739–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, S. J., A. A. Snow &M. L. Stanton. 1986. Fertilization dynamics and parental effects upon fruit development inRaphanus raphanistrum: consequences for seed size variation. Amer. J. Bot.73:500–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, C. &R. B. Primack 1985. Effects of pollen and nitrogen availability on reproduction in a woodland herb,Lysimachiaquadrifolia. Oecologia67:403–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. Resources limit the fecundity of three woodland herbs. Oecologia71:431–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade, L. A. 1983. Pollination intensity and seed set inTrichanthera gigantea (Acanthaceae). Biotropica15:122–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &P. Davidar. 1984. Determinants of frait and seed set inPavonia dasypetala (Malvaceae). Oecologia64:61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizui, N. &K. Kikuzawa. 1991. Proximate limitations to fruit and seed set inPhellodendron amurense var.sachalinense. Pl. Spec. Biol.6:39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, A. M. &J. D. Ackerman. 1987. Limitations to fruit production inIonopsisutricularioides (Orchidaceae). Biotropica19:24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, D. H. &R. S. Fritz. 1983. Contributions of diurnal and nocturnal insects to the pollination of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) in a pollen-limited system. Oecologia60:190–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motten, A. F. 1983. Reproduction ofErythronium umbilicatum (Liliaceae): pollination success and pollinator effectiveness. Oecologia59:351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1986. Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. Ecol. Monogr.56:21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, N. &M. Maki. 1992. Sex allocation ratio in a wind-pollinated self-incompatible monoecious tree,Alnus firma Sieb. et Zucc. (Betulaceae). Pl. Spec. Biol.7:97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murawski, D. A. 1987. Floral resource variation, pollinator response, and potential pollen flow inPsiguria warscewiczii. Ecology68:1273–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murcia, C. 1990. Effect of floral morphology and temperature on pollen receipt and removal inIpomea trichocarpa. Ecology71:1098–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nault A. &D. Gagnon. 1987. Some aspects of the pollination ecology of wild leek,Allium tricoccum Ait. Pl. Spec. Biol.2:127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E. M. &D. Clayton. 1986. Reproductive biology of two Florida pawpaws:Asimina obovata andA. pygmaea (Annonaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club113:16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,K. Rice &S. Cochran. 1992. Reproductive biology ofAsimina parviflora (Annonaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club119:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockendon, D. J. &L. Currah. 1977. Self-pollen reduces the number of cross-pollen tubes in the styles ofBrassica olemceae L. New Phytol.78:675–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohara, M., S. Kawamo &F. H. Utech. 1990. Differentiation patterns of reproduction systems in the genusTrillium. Pl. Spec. Biol.5:73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliviera, P. E., P. E. Gibbs, A. A. Barbosa &S. Talavera. 1992. Contrasting breeding systems in twoEriotheca (Bombacaceae) species of the Brazilian cerrados. Pl. Syst. Evol.179:207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. V. 1989. Perspectives in hierarchy and scale. Pages 140–156in J. Roughgarden, R. M. May, and S. A. Levin (eds.) Perspectives in Ecological Theory. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler, P. A., H. G. Baker &G. W. Frankie. 1975. Reproductive biology of some Costa RicanCardia species (Boraginaceae). Biotropica7:234–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff, R. 1971. The reproductive system ofJepsonia heterandra. Evolution25:300–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, M. M., P. G. Kevan &M. A. Lane. 1988. Pollination biology ofOpuntia polyacantha andOpuntia phaeacantha (Cactaceae) in southern Colorado. Pl. Syst. Evol.159:85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Part, J. M., M. W. Merchant, D. R. E. Williams &B. J. D. Meeuse. 1989. Pollination biology ofPlatanthera stricta (Orchidaceae) in Olympic National Park, Washington. Amer. J. Bot.76:1097–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, C., J. H. Brown &A. Kodric-Brown. 1982. An experimental study of floral display and fruit set inChilopsis linearis (Bignoniaceae). Oecologia55:7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, M. W. 1991. Pollination by a guild of fluctuating moth populations: option for unspecialization inSilene vulgaris. J. Ecol.79:591–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants, J. M. &S. J. Chaplin. 1983. Nectar production rates ofAsclepias quadrifolia: causes and consequences of individual variation. Oecologia59:232–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, R. B. &P. Hall. 1990. Costs of reproduction in the Pink Lady’s Slipper orchid: a four-year experimental study. Amer. Naturalist136:638–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &D. G. Lloyd. 1980. Andromonoecy in the New Zealand shrub,Leptospermum scoparium (Myrtaceae). Amer. J. Bot.67:361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller, D. C. 1983 Sexual selection in a hermaphroditic plant. Nature305:706–707

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. Sexual selection in flowering plants. Pages 165–179in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, (eds.), Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, N. &Y. Brito. 1990. Reproductive biology of a tropical palm swamp community in the Venezuelan llanos. Amer. J. Bot.77:1260–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, M., N. Prakash &S. Cairns. 1993. Breeding systems of disjunct populations of Christmas Bells (Blandfordia grandiflora R.Br., Liliaceae): variation in self-fertility and an ovular mechanism regulating self-fertilisation. Austral. J. Bot.41:35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathcke, B. 1988. Interactions for pollinations among coflowering shrubs. Ecology69:446–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Real, L. A. &B. J. Rathcke. 1991. Individual variation in nectar production and its effects on fitness inKalmia latifolia. Ecology72:149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. L. &R. Wyatt. 1990. Reproductive biology of the yellow finged orchid,Platanthera ciliaris. Amer. J. Bot.77:388–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, O. J. &A. G. Stephenson. 1991. Effects of nonrandom seed abortion on progeny performance inPhaseolus coccineus L. Evolution45:1198–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Robles, J. A., E. J. Meléndez &J. D. Ackerman. 1992. Effects of display size, flowering phenology, and nectar availability on effective visitation frequency inComparattia falcata (Orchidaceae). Amer. J. Bot.79:1009–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R. W. 1977. Pollinator service in sympatric species of jewel weed (Impatiens: Balsaminaceae). J. New York Ent. Soc.85:234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D. W. 1980. Evolution of floral display in the orchidBrassavola nodosa. Evolution34:489–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1983. Breeding system and habitat effects on fitness components in three neotropicalCostus (Zingiberaceae). Evolution37:523–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlessman, M. A. 1985. Floral biology of American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club112:129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlising, R. A. 1976. Reproductive proficiency inPaennia californica (Paeoniaceae). Amer. J. Bot.63:1095–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, E. L. &D. M. Nichols. 1984. Floral biology ofArgemone aurantiaca (Papaveraceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club111:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, D. J. 1977. Floral biology ofDiervilla lonicera (Caprifoliaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club104:234–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, J. S. &S. C. H. Barrett. 1984. The effect of pollination intensity and incompatible pollen on seed set inTumera ulmifolia (Turneraceae). Canad. J. Bot.62:1298–1303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A. &M.-S. Baltus. 1987. Patch size, pollinator behavior, and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology68:1679–1690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, B. B., J. L. Neff &G. Dieringer. 1986. Reproductive biology ofTinantia anomala (Commelinaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club113:149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, A. A. 1982. Pollination intensity and potential seed set inPassiflora vitifolia. Oecologia55:231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1986. Pollination dynamics inEpilobium canum (Onagraceae): consequences for gametophytic selection. Amer. J. Bot.73:139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &S. J. Mazer. 1988. Gameophytic selection inRaphanus raphanistrum: a test for heritable variation in pollen competitive ability. Evolution42:1065–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &D. W. Roubik. 1987. Pollen deposition and removal by bees visiting two tree species in Panama. Biotropica19:57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &T. P. Spira. 1991. Differential pollen-tube growth rates and nonrandom fertilization inHibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). Amer. J. Bot.78:1419–1426.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &D. F. Whigham. 1989. Costs of flower and fruit production inTipularia discolor (Orchidaceae). Ecology70:1286–1293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sork, V. L. &D. W. Schemske. 1992. Fitness consequences of mixed-donor pollen loads in the annual legumeChamaecrista fasciculata. Amer. J. Bot.79:508–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, E. E. 1984. Photosynthate allocation to floral nectar: a neglected energy investment. Ecology65:1775–1779.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spears, E. E. 1987. Island and mainland pollination ecology ofCentrosema virginianum andOpuntia stricla. J.Ecol.75:351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, M. L. 1987. Reproductive biology of petal color variants in wild populations ofRaphanus sativus. 2. Factors limiting seed production. Amer. J. Bot.74:188–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &R. E. Preston. 1988a. Ecological consequences and phenotypic correlates of petal size variation in wild radish,Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Amer. J. Bot.75:528–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988b. A qualitative model for evaluating the effects of flower attractiveness on male and female fitness in plants. Amer. J. Bot.75:540–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, M. L., A. A. Snow &S. N. Handel. 1986. Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science232:1625–1627.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. 1957. Self-fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. Amer. Naturalist91:337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. D. &J. H. Torrie. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, A. G. 1979. An evolutionary examination of the floral display ofCatalpa speciosa (Bignoniaceae). Evolution33:1200–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.12:253–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &J. A. Winsor. 1986.Lotus corniculatus regulates offspring quality through selective fruit abortion. Evolution40:453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. P. 1988. On the gynodioecious polymorphism inSaxifraga granulata L. (Saxifragaceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc.35:15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara, T. 1988. Floral biology ofHeterotropa tamaensis (Aristolochiaceae) in Japan. Pl. Spec. Biol.3:7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, S. 1987. Why hermaphroditic plants produce many more flowers than fruits: an experimental test withAgave mckelveyana. Evolution41:750–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &L. F. Delph. 1984. On the importance of male fitness in plants: patterns of fruit-set. Ecology65:1093–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, S. D. &S. H. Sohmer. 1976. The biology ofPodophyllum peltatum L. (Berberidaceae), the may apple. II. The transfer of pollen and success of sexual reproduction. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club103:223–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, H. 1984. The floral biology ofTricyrtis latifolia Maxim. (Liliaceae). Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)97:207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. A comparative floral and pollination biology ofTricyrtis flava Maxim.,T. nana Yatabe andT. ohsumiensis Masamune (Liliaceae). Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)100:185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. The floral biology ofTricyrtis affinis Makimo (Liliaceae). Pl. Spec. Biol.4:61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Threadgill, P. F., J. M. Baskin &C. C. Baskin. 1981. The floral ecology ofFrasera caroliniensis (Gentianaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club108:25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, J. 1984. Breeding system, pollination, and pollinator limitation in a perennial herb,Amianthum muscaetoxicum (Lilliaceae). Amer. J. Bot.71:941–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pages 136–179in B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. &I. C. Machado. 1991. Pollination of four sympatric species ofAngelonia (Scrophulariaceae) by oil-collecting bees in NE. Brazil. Pl. Syst. Evol.178:153–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, N. E. &D. Charlesworth. 1992. Evolutionary interpretations of differences in pollen tube growth rates. Quart. Rev. Biol.67:19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N. M. 1983. The adaptive nature of floral traits: ideas and evidence. Pages 241–285in L. Real (ed.), Pollination Biology. Academic Press, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, S. G. 1980. Pollen flow and fecundity in populations ofLithospermum caroliniense. Amer. J. Bot.67:1334–1341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, R. J. &R. L. Goldingay. 1989. Factors affecting fruit-set inTelopea speciosissima (Proteaceae): the importance of pollen limitation. J. Ecol.77:1123–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisler, S. L. &A. A. Snow. 1992. Potential for the loss of self-incompatibility in pollen-limited populations of mayapple (Podophyllum peltatum). Amer. J. Bot.79:1273–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, D. 1984. Ovule survivorship, broodsize, life history, breeding systems, and reproductive success in plants. Oecologia64:47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,C. L. Calvin, C. A. Wilson, C. I. Davern, D. Frank &S. R. Seavey. 1987. Reproductive success, spontaneous embryo abortion, and genetic load in flowering plants. Oecologia71:501–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,D. L. Nickrent, C. I. Davern, C. L. Calvin &N. J. Vivrette. 1989. Developmental failure and loss of reproductive capacity in the rare paleoendemic shrubDedeckera eurekensis. Nature338:65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson, M. F. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. Amer. Naturalist113:777–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. Sexual selection in plants and animals. Trends Ecol. Evol.5:210–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &N. Burley. 1983. Mate Choice in Plants. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &P. W. Price. 1977. The evolution of inflorescence size inAsclepias (Asclepiadaceae). Evolution31:495–511

    Google Scholar 

  • — &D. W. Schemske. 1980. Pollinator limitation, fruit production, and floral display in pawpaw (Asimina triloba). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club107:401–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P., J. D. Thomson, M. L. Stanton & L. P. Rigney. 1994. Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination sucess. Amer. Naturalist (in press).

  • Worthen, W. B. &E. W. Stiles. 1988. Pollen-limited fruit set in isolated patches ofMaianthemum canadense Desf. in New Jersey. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club115:299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, R. 1982. Inflorescence architecture: how flower number, arrangement, and phenology affect pollination and fruit set. Amer. J. Bot.69:585–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &R. L. Hellwig. 1979. Factors determining fruit set in heterostylous bluets,Houstonia caerulea (Rubiaceae). Syst. Bot.4:103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. J. 1986. Beetle pollination ofDiffenbachia longispatha (Araceae). Amer. J. Bot.73:931–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &M. L. Stanton. 1990. Influences of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. Ecology71:536–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &T. P. Young 1992. Alternative outcomes of natural and experimental high pollen loads. Ecology73:639–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. P. 1982. Bird visitation, seed-set, and germination rates in two species ofLobelia on Mount Kenya. Ecology63:1983–1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J. K. &T. M. Aide. 1989. Patterns of fruit production in a neotropical orchid: pollinator vs. resource limitation. Amer. J. Bot.76:67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. &G. H. Pyke. 1988. Reproduction inPolemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. Amer. Naturalist131:723–738.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burd, M. Bateman’s principle and plant reproduction: The role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot. Rev 60, 83–139 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02856594

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02856594

Keywords

Navigation