Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Motivation and the communication processes

  • Published:
Audiovisual communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen, W. H. “Audio-Visual Communication.” InEncyclopedia of Educational Research, third edition. C. W. Harris, editor. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1960. p. 115–37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berlyne, D. E.Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill Co., 1960.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Cofer, C. N. “Motivation.” InAnnual Review of Psychology, vol. 10. P. R. Farnsworth and Q. McNemar, editors. Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, Inc. 1959. p. 173–202.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coulson, J. E., and Silberman, H. F. “Effects of Three Variables in a Teaching Machine.”Journal of Educational Psychology 51: 135–43; 1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cronbach, L. J. “The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology.”American Psychologist 12: 671–84; 1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Estes, W. K. “Learning.” InEncyclopedia of Educational Research, third edition. C. W. Harris, editor. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1960. p. 750–72.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harlow, H. F. “Learning and Satiation of Response in Intrinsically Motivated Complex Puzzle Performance by Monkeys.”Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 43: 289–94; 1950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hilgard, E. R.Theories of Learning, second edition. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoban, C. F., and Van Ormer, E. B.Instructional Film Research, 1918–1950. Technical Report No. SDC 269-7-19. Special Devices Center, 1950.

  10. Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., and Sheffield, F. D.Experiments on Mass Communication. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Irvin, F. W. “Motivation and Performance.” InAnnual Review of Psychology 12: 217–42; 1961. P. R. Farnsworth and Q. McNemar, editors. Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, Inc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Janis, I. L., and Feschbach, S. “Effects of Fear-Arousing Communications.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 48: 78–92; 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Janis, I. L., and King, B. T. “Influence of Role-Playing on Opinion Change.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49: 211–218; 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keislar, E. R., and McNeil, J. “Active and Passive Instruction in a Teaching Machine Program with Primary School Children.” Paper presented, California Education Research Association, Palo Alto, Calif., 1961.

  15. Luchins, H. S. “Mechanizationin Problem-Solving: the Effect of ’Einstellung’’.” Psychological Monographs, No. 248, 1942.

  16. Lumsdaine, A. A., and Glaser, R.Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning: a Source Book. Department of Audiovisual Instruction, National Education Association, Washington, D. C, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mitnick, L., and McGinnies, E. “Influencing Ethno-Centrism in Small Discussion Groups through a Film Communication.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 56: 82–90; 1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, N. E., et al.Graphic Communication and the Crisis in Education (Reprint ofAudiovisual Communication Review Vol. 5, No. 3), Department of Audiovisual Instruction, National Education Association, Washington, D. C, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Newcomb, T. M. “Motivation in Social Behavior.” InCurrent Theory and Research in Motivation: A Symposium. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1953. p. 139–61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Porter, D. “A Critical Review of a Portion of the Literature on Teaching Devices.”Harvard Educational Review 27: 126–47; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Postman, L. “The Experimental Analysis of Motivational Factors in Perception.”Current Theory and Research in Motivation: A Symposium. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1953. p. 59–108.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sekerak, R. M. “Mass Communication Media, Reading Comprehension, and Intelligence.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 5: 468–75; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Simon, H. A. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.”Models of Man. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Suppes, P., and Ginsberg, R.Application of a Stimulus Sampling Model to Children’s Concept Formation of Binary Numbers, with and without Overt Correction Response: Technical Report No. 35, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Psychology Series, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vernon, P. E. “An Experiment on the Value of the Film and Filmstrip in the Instruction of Adults.”British Journal of Educational Psychology 16: 149–62; 1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wittich, W. A., and Fowlkes, J. G.Audio-Visual Paths to Learning, New York: Harper, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanford University, USA

    Frederick J. McDonald (Assistant professor of education and Psychology)

Authors
  1. Frederick J. McDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDonald, F.J. Motivation and the communication processes. ECTJ 9, 57–67 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769478

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769478

Keywords

Search

Navigation