Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perceived quality of fifty selected journals: Academicians and practitioners

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper was undertaken to help academicians and practitioners better fit manuscripts to journals. Fifty selected journals were analyzed for perceptions of quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billings, Bradley B., and George J. Viksnins. 1972. “The Relative Quality of Economics Journals: An Alternative Rating System.”Western Economic Journal 10 (December) 467–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabell, David W. E. 1981.Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Business, Administration and Economics. Beaumont: Cabell Publishing Company, Third Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, Robert K., and Irwin Weinstock. 1982. “Evaluating the Business/Economic Professor's Journal Publications: Perceptions Versus Reality,” a paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Western Association of Collegiate Schools of Business, Scottsdale, Arizona (October).

  • Coe, Robert K., and Irwin Weinstock. 1969. “The Perceived Image and Policies of the Business Journals.”The Southern Journal of Business 4 (July) 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, Albert L., and Charles D. Delorme, Jr. 1976. “Some Empirical Evidence on the Variables Associated with the Ranking of Econmics Journals.”Southern Economic Journal 43 (October) 1149–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Robert G., Lawrence S. Ritter, and Ingo Walter. 1973. “What Economists Think of Their Journals.”Journal of Political Economy 81 (July/August) 1017–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. B. 1940. “Climbing the Academic Ladder.”American Sociological Review 5 384–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Laurence J., and Bernard W. Taylor, III. 1980. “A Study of Institutional Publications in Business-Related Academic Journals, 1972–78.”Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 20 (Spring) 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeels, Jack W., and Ryland A. Taylor. 1972. “The Relative Quality of Economics Journals: An Alternative Rating System.”Western Economic Journal 10 (December) 470–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, Charles N. 1975. “Evaluations of Sixty-four Journals Which Publish Articles on Management.” Working Paper of the Management Education and Development Division of the Academic of Management (Summer).

  • Weber, Richard P., and W. C. Stevenson. 1981. “Evaluations of Accounting Journal and Department Quality.”Accounting Review 56 (July) 596–612.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, USA

    Elaine Hobbs Fry, C. Glenn Walters & Lawrence E. Scheuermann

Authors
  1. Elaine Hobbs Fry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Glenn Walters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lawrence E. Scheuermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fry, E.H., Walters, C.G. & Scheuermann, L.E. Perceived quality of fifty selected journals: Academicians and practitioners. JAMS 13, 352–361 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729725

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729725

Keywords

Search

Navigation