Skip to main content
Log in

Observations of convergence and uniqueness of node-based bone remodeling simulations

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some investigators have indicated that mathematical theories and computational models of bone adaptation may not converge and that the density solutions from such simulations are dependent on the initial density distribution In this study, two-dimensional finite element models were used to investigate the effect of initial density distribution on the final density distribution produced using a node-based bone remodeling simulation. The first model was a generic long bone, and the second was a proximal femur. For each model, we conducted time-dependent, node-based, linear rate-law bone remodeling simulations. Five initial density conditions were used with the generic long bone and three with the proximal femur. Remodeling simulations were performed, and the largest average nodal density differences at the end of the simulations were 0.000010 g/cm3 and 0.000006 g/cm3 for the generic long bone and proximal femur models, respectively. Results illustrate that, for a given set of loads and a given finite element model, the node-based bone adaptation algorithm can yield a unique density distribution. In conjunction with previous studies, this finding suggests that uniqueness of the density solution is dependent on both the mathematical theory and the computational implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beaupré, G. S., T. E. Orr, and D. R. Carter. An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: a preliminary remodeling simulation.J. Orthop. Res. 8:662–670, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaupré, G. S., T. E. Orr, and D. R. Carter. An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling—theoretical development.J. Orthop. Res. 8:651–661, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carter, D. R.. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling.Calcif. Tissue Int. 36:19–24, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter, D. R.. The relationship between, in vivo strains and cortical bone remodeling.CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 8:1–28, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cowin, S. C.. Bone modeling of diaphyseal surfaces by torsional loads: theoretical predictions.J. Biomech. 20:1111–1120, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frost, H. M.. Sekeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU). 2. Redefining Wolff's law: the remodeling problem.Anat. Rec. 226:414–422, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Huiskes, R., H. Weinans, H. J. Grootenboer, M. Dalstra, B. Fudala, and T. J. Slooff. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis.J. Biomech. 20:1135–1150, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobs, C. R. Numerical simulation of bone adaption to mechanical loading. Stanford, CA. Stanford University. Ph.D. Dissertation, 1994, pp. 1–127.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobs, C. R., M. E. Levenston, G. S. Beaupré, and J. C. Simo. A new implementation of finite element-based bone remodeling. In: Recent advances in computer methods in biomechanics & biomedical engineering, edited by J. Middleton, G. N. Pande, and K. R. Williams. Swansea, UK: Books & Journals International Ltd., 1992, pp. 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs, C. R., M. E. Levenston, G. S. Beaupré, J. C. Simo, and D. R. Carter. Numerical instabilities in bone remodeling simulations: the advantages, of a node-based finite element approach.J. Biomech. 28:449–459, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin, R. B.. Porosity and specific surface of bone.CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10:179–222, 1984.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mullender, M. G., and R. Huiskes. Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff's Law.J. Orthop. Res. 13:503–512, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mullender, M. G., R. Huiskes, and H. Weinans. A physiological approach to the simulation of bone remodeling as a self-organization control process.J. Biomech. 27:1389–1394, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Orr, T. E. The role of mechanical stresses in bone remodeling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 1990, pp. 1–151.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Turner, C. H., V. Anne, and R. M. Pidaparti. Convergene and Uniqueness of Bone Adaptation Models, vol. 18. Transactions of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA, 1993, pp. 1–527.

  16. Weinans, H., R. Huiskes, and H. J. Grootenboer. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models.J. Biomech. 25:1425–1441, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinans, H., R. Huiskes, and H. J. Grootenboer. Convergence and uniqueness of adaptive bone remodeling, vol. 14. Transactions of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Las Vegas, NV, 1989, pp. 1–310.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, K.J., Jacobs, C.R., Levenston, M.E. et al. Observations of convergence and uniqueness of node-based bone remodeling simulations. Ann Biomed Eng 25, 261–268 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648040

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648040

Keywords

Navigation