Abstract
Historically, total quality management theory argues against the use of traditional performance appraisal systems. However, contemporary managers need a means of gathering information for human resource decisions concerning individuals. This study examines the suitability of peer appraisals for the TQM environment, and the potential impact peer appraisals may have on enhancing employee commitment to the TQM process as viewed through a procedural justice framework.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyle, M. (1969).Social Interaction. London: Methuen.
Barrett, R.S. (1966).Performance Rating. Chicago: Research Associates.
Benson, T.E. (1992). Quality and teamwork get a leg up.Industry Week, April 6, 1992, 66–68.
Bernardin, H.J., & Beatty, R.W. (1984).Performance Appraisal: Assessing Human Behavior at Work. Boston, MA.: Kent.
Bernardin, H.J., & Pence, E.C. (1980). Effects of rater error training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 60–66.
Borman, W.C. (1974). The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 105–124.
Cederblom, D., & Lounsbury, J.W. (1980). An investigation of user acceptance of peer evaluations.Personnel Psychology, 33, 567–579.
Deming, W.E. (1982) Improvement of quality and productivity through action by management.National Productivity Review, Winter, 12–27.
Deming, W.E. (1986).Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DeNisi, A.S., & Mitchell, J.L. (1978). An analysis of peer ratings as predictors and criterion measures and a proposed new application.Academy of Management Review, 3, 369–374.
Dobbins, G.H., Cardy, R.L., & Carson, K.P. (1991). Examining fundamental assumptions: A contrast of person and system approaches to human resource management.Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 9, 1–38.
Henderson, R.I. (1984).Performance Appraisal. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing.
Hollander, E.P., & Webb, W.B. (1955). Leadership, followership and friendship: An analysis of peer nominations.Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 50, 163–167.
Hollander, E.P. (1956). Interpersonal exposure time as a determinant of the predictive utility of peer ratings.Psychological Reports, 2, 445–448.
Hollander, E.P. (1956). The friendship factor in peer nominations.Personnel Psychology, 9, 435–447.
Hollander, E.P. (1957). The reliability of peer nominations under various conditions of administration.Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 85–90.
Hollander, E.P. (1965). Validity of peer nominations in predicting a distant performance criterion.Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 434–438.
Kane, J.S., & Lawler, E.E. (1978). Methods of peer assessment.Psychological Bulletin, 85, 555–586.
Keeley, M. (1977). Subjective performance evaluation and person-role conflict under conditions of uncertainty.Academy of Management Journal, 20, 301–314.
Kenny, D.A., & Berman, J.S. (1980). Statistical approaches to the correction of bias.Psychological Bulletin, 88, 288–295.
Klimoski, R.J., & London, M. (1974). Role of the rater in performance appraisal.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 445–451.
Landy, F.J., Barnes-Farrell, J., & Cleveland, J.N. (1980). Perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation: A follow-up.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 355–356.
Landy, F.J., Barnes, J.L., & Murphy, K.R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 751–754.
Landy, F.J., Farr, J.L., Saal, F.G., & Freytag, W.R. (1976). BARS for rating the performance of police officers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 752–758.
Lawler, E.E. (1967). The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 369–381.
Lawler, E.E. (1971).Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lawler, E.E., Mohrman, S.A., & Ledford, G.E. (1992).Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management: Practices and Results in Fortune 1000 Companies. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass.
Leavitt, H.J. (1964).Managerial Psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, S.M. (1984). President’s Letter.Decision Line, 15, 1–3.
Leventhal, G.S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In Thibaut, J., Spence, J., and Carson, R., (Eds.),Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Leventhal, G.S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Gergen, K., Greenberg, M., and Willis, R., (Eds.),Social Exchange, 27–55. New York: Plenum.
Lewin, A.Y., Dubno, P., & Akula, W.G. (1971). Face-to-face interaction in the peer nomination process.Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 495–497.
Lewin, A.Y., & Zwany, A. (1976). Peer nominations: A model, literature critique and a paradigm for research.Personnel Psychology, 29, 423–447.
Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
Love, K.G. (1981). Comparison of peer assessment methods: Reliability, validity, friendship bias, and user reaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 451–457.
Mainstone, L.E., & Levi, A.S. (1987). Fundamentals of statistical process control.Organizational Behavior Management and Statistical Process Control, 8, 5–21.
McEvoy, G.M., & Buller, P.F. (1987). User acceptance of peer appraisals in an industrial setting.Personnel Psychology, 40, 785–797.
McEvoy, G.M., Buller, P.F., & Roghaar, S.R. (1988). A jury of one’s peers.Personnel Administrator, May, 94–101.
Mohrman, A.M., Resnick-West, S.M., & Lawler, E.E. (1989).Designing Performance Appraisal Systems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Murphy, K.R. (1982). Difficulties in the statistical control of halo.Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 161–164.
Murphy, K.R., & Cleveland, J.N. (1991).Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Norman, C.A., & Zawacki, R.A. (1991). Team appraisals-team approach.Personnel Journal, September, 101–104.
Norton, S.M. (1992). Peer assessments of performance and ability: An exploratory meta-analysis of statistical artifacts and contextual moderators.Journal of Business and Psychology, 6(3), 387–399.
Nowack, K. (1993). 360-degree feedback: the whole story.Training & Development, January, 69–72.
Quimby, C., Parker, L., & Weimerskirch, A. (1991). How exactly do you communicate quality?Quality Progress, 24, 52–54.
Rigg, M. (1992). Reasons for removing employee evaluations from management’s control.Industrial Engineering, August, 17.
Scholtes, P.R. (1987).An Elaboration on Deming’s Teachings on Performance Appraisal. Madison, WI: Joiner Associates.
Schmidt, F.L., & Johnson, R.H. (1973). Effect of race on peer ratings in an industrial situation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 211–214.
Smith, P.C. (1976). Behaviors, results, and organizational effectiveness: The problem of criteria. In Dunnette, M.D. (Ed.),Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd Ed., 745–755. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Snell, S.A., & Dean, J.W. (1992). Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: a human capital perspective.Academy of Management Journal, 3, 467–504.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure.California Law Review, 66, 541–566.
Townsend, P.L. (1986).Commit to Quality. New York: Wiley.
Tyler, T.R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 333–344.
Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1991). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. (Ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 115–191. New York: Academic Press.
Waters, L.K., & Waters, C.S. (1970). Peer nominations as predictors of short term sales performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 42–44.
Wexley, K.N., & Klimoski, R. (1984). Performance appraisal: An update. In Rowland, K.M., & Ferris, G.R. (Eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 2, 35–79. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Wherry, R. J., & Bartlett, C.J. (1982). The control of bias in ratings: A theory of rating.Personnel Psychology, 35, 521–555.
Wollner, G.E. (1992). The law of producing quality.Quality Progress, 25, 35–40.
Zammuto, R.F., London, M., & Rowland, K. (1982). Organization and rater differences in performance appraisals.Personnel Psychology, 35, 643–658.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Westerman, J.W. Rethinking the role of performance appraisal in total quality management: An argument for the use of peers as raters. Employ Respons Rights J 9, 273–284 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02639902
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02639902