Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships among pay inequity, perceptions of procedural justice, and organizational citizenship

  • Articles
  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explored relationships between employee dissatisfaction with pay, perceptions of procedural justice, and organizational citizenship behavior. It was hypothesized that pay inequity would be negatively related to citizenship, while favorable perceptions of procedural and interpersonal justice would be positively related. Results provided strong support for the hypotheses only with regard to a dimension of citizenship labeled “compliance.” Implications for employee behavior in the workplace and the expression of grievances are discussed; future research directions are also offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.)Advances in Experimental Psychology, Vol. 2, 267–299. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior.Social Justice Research, 1, 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett-Howard, E., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions.Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 50, 296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”.Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1966).The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L., & Walster, E. (1976).Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R., Sheppard, B., & Bazerman, M. (Eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 43–53. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts.Social Justice Research, 1, 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P. (1975). Adaptation-level determinants of pay satisfaction with equal and unequal outcome distributions in skill and chance situations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1982).Relative Deprivation and Working Women. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A. (1959). A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation.Sociometry, 22, 280–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1986).Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. & Konovsky, M. A., (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions.Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortado, B. (1992). Subordinate views in supervisory conflict situations: Peering into the subcultural chasm.Human Relations, 45(11), 1141–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, G. E., & Gordon, M. E. (1989). Workplace justice and job satisfaction as predictors of satisfaction with union and management.Academy of Management Journal, 32, 851–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W. (1986). Organizational citizenship informed by political theory. Paper presented at Academy of Management meetings, Chicago, IL.

  • Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations,Journal of Applied Psychology, 16, 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987a). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories.Academy of Management Review, 12, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987b). Using diaries to promote procedural justice in performance appraisals.Social Justice Research, 1, 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior.Behavioral Science, 9, 131–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). The perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In Thibaut, J. W., Spence, J. T., Carson, R. C. (Eds.)Altruism and Helping Behavior, 213–232. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Frey, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In Mikula, G. (Ed.),Justice and Social Interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., & Parsons, C. K. (1986). A field study of job applicant interview perceptions, alternation opportunities, and demographic characteristics.Personnel Psychology, 39, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Lissak, R. I. (1985). Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J. (1984). Does job satisfaction lead to consideration and personal sensitivity?Academy of Management Journal, 27, 910–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. A. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. (1988).Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paese, P. W., Lind, E. A., & Kanfer, R. (1988). Procedural fairness and work group responses to performance evaluation systems.Social Justice Research, 2, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puffer, S. M. (1987). Prosocial behavior, noncompliant behavior, and work performance among commission salespeople.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 615–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, R. W., Cooper, E. A., & McKenna, J. F. (1987). Referent selection in determining equity perceptions: Differential effects on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes.Personnel Psychology, 40, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth, H. A. (1992). Fairness and justice: A review of recent psychological research. Working paper. University of California, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Organ, D., & Near, J. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents.Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M. (1949).The American Soldier: Adjustment during Army Life, Vol. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures.Law and Society Review, 22, 103–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & McGraw, K. (1986). Ideology and interpretation of personal experience: Procedural justice and political quiescence.Journal of Social Issues, 42, 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979).The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aquino, K. Relationships among pay inequity, perceptions of procedural justice, and organizational citizenship. Employ Respons Rights J 8, 21–33 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02621253

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02621253

Key words

Navigation