Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical activities and satisfaction of general internists, cardiologists, and ophthalmologists

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To define factors that affect the levels of practice satisfaction of different specialities, an observer recorded the activities of 15 physicians in practice (nine general internists, three cardiologists, and three ophthalmologists) as they examined 304 clinic patients. General internists reported less satisfaction with their clinics than did the other physicians and attributed their satisfaction primarily to successful social interaction in 54% of visits, while cardiologists most often derived satisfaction from intellectual stimulation (50%) and ophthalmologists from medical success (81%). The general internists whom the authors observed are less satisfied with clinical encounters than are cardiologists and ophthalmologists and derive satisfaction mostly from social interaction, not biomedical aspects of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Graettinger JS. Internal medicine in the National Resident Matching Program 1987: the ides of March. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:101015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moser RH. The future of American medicine. Cleve Clin J Med. 1987;54:67–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCarty DJ. Why are today’s medical students choosing high technology specialities over internal medicine? N Engl J Med. 1987;317:567–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz MD, Linzer M, Babbott D, et al. Medical student interest in internal medicine: initial report of the Society of General Internal Medicine interest group survey on factors influencing career choice in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:6–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hershey CO, McAloon MH, Bertram DA. The new medical practice environment: internists’ view of the future. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1745–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reames HR, Dunstone DC. Professional satisfaction of physicians. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1951–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pastor WH, Huset RA, Lee MC. Job and life satisfaction among rural physicians. Minn Med. 1989;72:215–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Linn LS, Yager J, Cope DW, Leake B. Factors associated with life satisfaction among practicing internists. Med Care. 1986;24:830–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis CE, Prout DM, Chalmers DP, Leake B. How satisfying is the practice of internal medicine? Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:1–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Petersdorf RG. General internal medicine: fad or future? J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:527–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosman HS, Walker HK, Hall WD, Hill RO. Changes in the internal medicine internship from 1967 to 1987: explanations for decreasing interest in the discipline? South Med J. 1989;82(4):414–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petrozzi, M.C., Rosman, H.S., Nerenz, D.R. et al. Clinical activities and satisfaction of general internists, cardiologists, and ophthalmologists. J Gen Intern Med 7, 363–365 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598096

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598096

Key words

Navigation