Abstract
For most hand surgeons, flexor tendon repairs in zone 2 of the hand still present a clinical problem. The surgeon is placed in a dilemma: on the one hand, if repair is achieved and the finger is kept immobile during the healing phase, dense adhesions may bind the tendons within the sheath and limit motion. On the other hand, uncontrolled early flexion may disrupt the tendon repair. Early ‘controlled motion’ increases tensile strength, reduces the formation of adhesions and improves clinical results. To investigate the relationship between the patient's compliance concerning the post-operative motion regimen and the final range of motion, a device has been developed which records when and how often the patient exercises. The device is attached to a modified Kleinert splint. This configuration enables comparison of the outcome of the rehabilitation of patients who exercise according to the rehabilitation programme with patients who exercise less often. The device measures for up to one week. It is possible to download the available measurement samples (exercise count per quarter of an hour) for inspecting the training course or for further analysis/statistics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Van Alphen, J.C., Oepkes, C.T. andBos, K.E. (1996): ‘Activity of the extrinsic finger flexors during mobilization in the Kleinert splint’,J. Hand Surg.,21A, pp. 77–84
Becker, H. andHardy, M. (1980): ‘A constant tension dynamic splint’,J. Plastic Reconst. Surg.,66, pp. 148–150
Chow, J.A., Thomes, L.J., Dovelle, S., Milnor, W.H., Seyfer, A.E. andSmith, A.C. (1987): ‘A combined regimen of controlled motion following flexor tendon repair in “No Man's Land”’,J. Plastic Reconst. Surg.,79, pp. 447–453
Chow, J.A., Thomes, L.J., Dovelle, S., Monsivais, J., Milnor, W.H. andJackson, J.P. (1988): ‘Controlled motion rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and grafting’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,70B, pp. 591–595
Ejeskär, A. (1984): ‘Flexor tendon repair in “No Man's Land”: Results of primary repair with controlled mobilization’,J. Hand. Surg.,9A(2), pp. 171–177
Gault, D.T. (1987): ‘A review of repaired flexor tendons’,J. Hand Surg.,12B, pp. 321–325
Gelberman, R.H., Amiel, D., Gonsalves, M., Woo, S. andAkeson, W.H. (1981): ‘The influence of protective passive mobilization on the healing of flexor tendons: A biochemical and angiographic study’,The Hand13(2), pp. 120–128
Gelberman, R.H., Vandenberg, J.S., Manske, P.R. andAkeson, W.H. (1985): ‘The early stages of flexor tendon healing: A morphologic study of the first fourteen day's’,J. Hand Surg.,10A, pp. 776–784
Kleinert, H.E., Kutz, J.E., Ashbell, T.S. andMartinez, E. (1967): ‘Primary repair of lacerated flexor tendons in “No Man's Land”’,J. Bone and Joint Surg.,49A, p. 577
Lister, G.D., Kleinert, H.E., Kutz, H.E. andAtasoy, E. (1977): ‘Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization’,J. Hand Surg.,2, pp. 441–451
Strickland, J.W. andGlogovac, S.V. (1980): ‘Digital function following flexor tendon repair in zone 2: A compariso of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques’,J. Hand Surg.,5, pp. 537–543
Strickland, J.W. (1989): ‘Flexor tendon surgery, review article’,J. Hand Surg.,14B, pp. 261–271
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dobbe, J.G.G., van Trommel, N.E., de Freitas Baptista, J.E. et al. A portable device for finger tendon rehabilitation that provides an isotonic training force and records exercise behaviour after finger tendon surgery. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 37, 396–399 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513318
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513318