Abstract
Watershed ordinances in Austin, Texas, USA, are intended to protect streams from stormwater degradation. Their adequacy is being questioned, however, where development is advancing into the Hill Country northwest and southwest of the city. Detailed investigation into hillslope runoff reveals that several important facts were overlooked in the ordinances, including locally high infiltration rates and drainage basins, which function as partial area systems. As a result, development planning is not taking advantage of the natural mitigation potential of the land. Roads cut across infiltration and moisture retention areas on side slopes, enlarging the partial area system feeding streams with stormflows. In addition, most residential planning is not responsive to the stepped microtopography of Hill Country drainage basins and the critical scale at which local runoff processes operate. Recommendations include adjusting the scale and configuration of development to conform with local runoff processes and features and taking advantage of the water-absorbing capacities of basin side slopes. The lesson for ordinance writers is that standard models of community stormwater ordinances are not appropriate for all terrains, especially complex ones like the Texas Hill Country.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Barfield, B. and other 1981. Applied hydrology and sedimentology for disturbed areas. Oklahoma Technical Press, Stillwater, Oklahoma.
Caudill, D. S., and R. J. George. 1987. The Town Lake manifesto: Zoning on the ragged edge of Texas law and of Texas cities.South Texas Law Review 19:701–747.
City of Austin. 1991. Comprehensive watersheds ordinance. Austin, Texas.
City of Austin. 1992. SOS (save our springs) ordinance. Austin, Texas.
City of Austin. 1993. Notice of emergency rule. Austin, Texas.
Dunne, T., and L. B. Leopold. 1978. Water in environmental planning. Freeman, San Francisco, 818 pp.
Glick, R. H., and others 1991. Urban runoff quality as affected by native vegetation.Proceedings, American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper 91-2067, 13 pp.
Horton, R. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology.Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 56:275–370.
Marsh, W. M., and R. Hill-Rowley. 1989. Water quality, stormwater management, and development planning on the urban fringe.Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law 35:3–36.
Marsh, W. M., and N. L. Marsh. 1994. Microtopography, runoff processes, sediment transport, and their implications for land use planning in the central Texas Hill Country.Transactions, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies 44:447–456.
Northern Virginia Planning District Commission. 1979. Guidebook for screening nonpoint pollution management strategies. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC.
Thurow, T. L., W. H. Blackburn, and C. A. Taylor, Jr. 1986. Hydrologic characteristics of vegetation types as affected by livestock grazing systems, Edwards Plateau, Texas.Journal of Range Management 39:505–509.
Wilding, L. P. 1991. Environment soil resource assessment of Barton Creck Properties, Inc.: Phase 1 (unpublished report). Barton Creck Properties, 48 pp.
Wilding, L. P. 1993. Data on soil infiltration rates (unpublished report). Barton Creek Properties, Austin, Texas, 12 pp.
Wilding, L. P., and C. M. Woodruff, Jr. 1993. Soils and landforms in the central Texas Hill Country—implications for waste water application.Proceedings, 1993 on-site wastewater treatment and research council conference. Austin, Texas (variously paginated).
Wipple, W. and others 1983. Stormwater management in urbanizing areas. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Woodruff, C. M., Jr., and W. M. Marsh. 1993. Junipers, grassland, and historical land use change in the Hill Country Uplands, Pages 5-1-5-12in C. M. Woodruff, Jr., W. M. Marsh, and L. P. Wilding (eds.) and L. P. Wilding (eds.), Soils, landforms, hydrologic processes, and land use issues—Glen Rose limestone terrains, Barton Creek Watershed, Travis County Texas. Society of Independent Professional Earth Scientists, Austin, Texas.
US Soil Conservation Service. 1974. Soil survey of Travis County, Texas. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marsh, W.M., Marsh, N.L. Hydrogeomorphic considerations in development planning and stormwater management, central Texas Hill Country, USA. Environmental Management 19, 693–702 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471952
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471952