Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of GC-MS and HPLC for overcoming matrix interferences in the analysis of PAHs in smoked food

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Several separation and detection methods for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in smoked chicken by GC and HPLC were compared. With HPLC and a gradient solvent system, all 16 PAHs could be simultaneously separated and detected by fluorescence with seven settings of programmable wavelength (excitation/emission). The presence of impurities in smoked chicken could interfere with the subsequent identification and quantification of PAHs by HPLC. With GC and a temperature programming method, all 16 PAHs could be separated and the PAHs in the chicken sample could be detected with an ion-trap mass spectrometer even in the presence of fat-or PAH-like impurities. Nine PAHs were identified by the former method while fourteen PAHs were identified by the latter method. The retention times by HPLC were shorter than those by GC, also, the former had better separation for most PAHs than the latter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IARC, “Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk chemicals to humans” IARC: Lyon,Vol. 32 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. IARC. “Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk chemicals to humans” IARC: Lyon,Suppl. 7 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. E. Doremire, G. E. Harmon, D. E. Pratt, J. Food Sci.44, 622 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O. A. Afolabi, E. A. Adesulu, O. L. Oke, J. Agric. Food Chem.31, 1083 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. F. L. Joe, J. Salemme, T. Fazio, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem.67, 1076 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. F. Lawrence, D. F. Weber, J. Agric. Food Chem.32, 789 (1984a).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Lawrence, D. F. Weber, J. Agric. Food Chem.32, 794 (1984b).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. E. A. Gomma, J. I. Gray, S. Rabie, C. L. Bote, A. M. Boorem, Food Addit. Contam.10, 503 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Simko, B. Brunckova, Food Addit. Contam.10, 257 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Y. Yabiku, M. S. Martins, M. Y. Takahashi, Food. Addit. Contam.10, 399 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. A. Wise, L. C. Sander, W. E. May, J. Chromatogr.642, 329 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Castello, T. C. Gerbino, J. Chromatogr.642, 351 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. B. H. Chen, C. Y. Wang, C. P. Chiu, J. Agric. Food Chem.44, 2244 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Kolarovic, H. Traitler, J. Chromatogr.237, 263 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. F. L. Joe, J. Salemme, T. Fazio, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem.65, 1395 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Takatsuki, S. Suzuki, N. Sato, I. Ushizawa, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem.68, 945 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Hopia, H. Pyysalo, K. Wickstrom, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem.63, 889 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. L. Lee, M. V. Novotny, Anal. Chem.48, 1566 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. P. Tuominen, H. Pyysalo, M. Sauri, J. Agric. Food Chem.36, 118 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. P. J. Marriott, P. D. Carpenter, P. H. Brady, M. J. Mccormick, A. J. Griffiths, T. S. G. Hatvani, S. G. Rasdell, J. Liq. Chromatogr.16, 3229 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. M. Hansen, I. L. Olsen, O. M. Poulsen, Am. Occup. Hyp.35, 603 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. W. Dong, J. X. Duggan, S. Stefanou, LC-GC11, 802 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Simko, J. Petrik, J. Karovicova, Acta Alimantaria.21, 107 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. D. Guillen, Manzanos, L. Zabala, J. Agric. Food Chem.43, 463 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. N. D. Bedding, D. E. McIntyre, J. N. Lester, R. Perry, J. Chromatogr. Sci.26, 597 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. W. Dong, A. Greenberg, J. Liq. Chromatogr.11, 1887 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. J. Johnston, J. P. Wong, S. E. Feldman, L. P. Ilnicki, J. Agric. Food Chem.42, 1954 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiu, C.P., Lin, Y.S. & Chen, B.H. Comparison of GC-MS and HPLC for overcoming matrix interferences in the analysis of PAHs in smoked food. Chromatographia 44, 497–504 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02466743

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02466743

Key Words

Navigation