Abstract
A test statistic is introduced which allows one to test the hypothesis of agreement of several judges on the ranking of items within each of two groups and between the two groups. The groups of judges may be unequal in size. A normal approximation for the test statistic is developed. The relationship to existing techniques given by Kendall, Friedman, Page, Spearman, and Lyerly is discussed. A generalization of the coefficient of concordance is presented and the extension of the method to multi-group problems is suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Duncan, D. B. A Bayesian approach to multiple comparisons.Technometrics, 1965,7, 171–222.
Frawley, W. H. and Schucany, W. R. Tables of the distribution of the £ concordance statistic, SMU Statistics Department Technical Report, 116, 1972.
Friedman, M. The use of ranks to avoid assumptions of normality implicit in the analysis of variance.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1937,32, 675–701.
Hays, W. L. A note on average tau as a measure of concordance.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1960,55, 331–341.
Kendall, M. G.Rank correlation methods. New York: Hafner Publishing Company, 1955.
Linhart, H. Approximate test form rankings.Biometrika, 1960,47, 476–480.
Lyerly, S. B. The average Spearman rank correlation coefficient.Psychometrika, 1952,17, 421–428.
Page, E. B. Ordered hypothesis for multiple treatments: a significance test for linear ranks.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1963,58, 216–230.
Schucany, W. R. A rank test for two group concordance (preliminary report).Annals of Mathematical Statistics (Abstract), 1971,42, 1146.
Thompson, W. A., Jr. and Willke, T. A. On an extreme rank sum test for outliers.Biometrika, 1963,50, 375–383.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Research supported in part by ONR Contract N00014-72-A-0296.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schucany, W.R., Frawley, W.H. A rank test for two group concordance. Psychometrika 38, 249–258 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291117
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291117