Skip to main content
Log in

Competition for nitrogen in a tussock tundra ecosystem

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The objective was to measure the competition for nitrogen among vascular plants, mosses, and soil microbes along a continuum of nitrogen availability, induced by carbon and nitrogen amendments, in a tussock tundra ecosystem.15N was used as a tracer. Vascular plants showed an increasing15N recovery with increasing time and with increasing nitrogen availability; the latter suggests that nitrogen was limiting vascular plant growth. Green mosses took up15N initially, but showed no significant trends with either treatment or time. There was a higher15N recovery in the soil insoluble compartment for the carbon-amended treatment than in the nitrogen-amended treatments; this suggested that carbon as an energy source limited microbial activity. After two months, the relative15N recovery fell in the order: soil microbes (≈79%)>vascular plants (≈16%) >green mosses (≈2%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allison F E 1966 The fate of nitrogen applied to soils. Adv. Agron. 18, 219–258.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson J H 1972 Phytocenology and primary production at Eagle Summit, Alaska. pp 61–69.In Proceddings 1972 Tundra Biome Symposium. Ed. S Bowen, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bremner J M 1965 Organic forms of nitrogen. pp 1238–1255.In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Ed. C A Black, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chapin F S, III, Miller P C, Billings W D, and Coyne P I 1980 Carbon and nutrient budgets and their control in coastal tundra. pp 458–482.In An Arctic Ecosystem: The Coastal Tundra at Barrow, Alaska. Eds. J Brown, P C Miller, L L Tieszen and F L Bunnell, Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Penn.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chapin F S, III, Van Cleve K, and Chapin M C 1979 Soil temperature and nutrient cycling in the tussock growth form ofEriophorum vaginatum. J. Ecol. 67, 169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dixon W J and Brown M B (Eds.) 1979 BMDP-79, Biomedical Computer Programs, P-Series. University of California Press, Berkeley 880 p.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dowding P, Chapin F S, III, Wielgolaski F E and Kilfeather P 1981 Nutrients in tundra ecosystems. pp 647–683.In Tundra Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis. Eds. L C Bliss, O W Heal and J J Moore, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Furbish C E and Wiedenfeld C C 1968 Soils of the Eagle Summit area, Alaska. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gersper P L, Alexander V, Barkley S A, Barsdate R J and Flint P S 1980 The soils and their nutrients. pp 219–254.In Arctic Ecosystem: The Coastal Tundra at Barrow, Alaska. Eds. J Brown, P C Miller, L L Tieszen and F L Bunnell. Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Penn.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hauck R D 1973 Nitrogen tracers in nitrogen cycle studies. Past use and future needs. J. Environ. Qual. 2, 317–327.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haunold E and Gludovatz A 1977 Stickstoffdynamik van alpinen Boden. Sitzungsber.-Oester. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 186, 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Issac R A and Johnson W C 1976 Determination of total nitrogen in plant tissue using ablock digester. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 59, 98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ivanko S 1972 Recent progress in the use of15N in research on nitrogen balance studies in soilplant relationships. pp 483–497.In Isotopes and Radiation in Soil-Plant Relationships Including Forestry, IEAC, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Knowles R and Lefebvre J 1972 Field, greenhouse and laboratory studies on the transformation and translocation of15N-labeled urea in a boreal forest black spruce system. pp 349–358.In Isotopes and Radiation in Soil-Plant Relationships Including Forestry. IAEC, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Malmer N and Nihlgard B 1980 Supply and transport of mineral nutrients in a subarctic mire.In Ecology of a Subarctic Mire. Ed. M Sonesson, Ecol. Bull. 30, 63–95.

  16. McCown B H 1978 The interactions of organic nutrients, soil nitrogen, and soil temperature and plant growth and survival in the arctic environment. pp 435–456.In Vegetation and Production Ecology of an Alaskan Arctic Tundra. Ed. L L Tieszen, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morrison I K and Foster N W 1977 Fate of urea fertilizer added to a boreal forestPinus banksiana Lamb. stand. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 441–448.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Norman A G 1968 Use of isotopes in soil organic matter studies; a survey. pp 89–105.In Study Week Org. Matter Soil Fert. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oberbauer S and Miller P C 1979 Plant water relations in montane and tussock tundra vegetation types in Alaska. Arct. Alp. Res. 11, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oechel W C and Sveinbjörnsson B 1978 Primary production processes in arctic bryophytes at Barrow, Alaska. pp 269–298.In Vegetation and Production Ecology of an Alaskan Arctic Tundra. Ed. L L Tieszen, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paul E A 1976 Nitrogen cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. pp 225–243.In Environmental Biogeochemistry, Proc. Int. Symp., 2nd. Ed. J O Nriagu. Ann Arbor Sci., Ann Arbor, Mich.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosswall T and Granhall U 1980 Nitrogen cycling in a subarctic ombrotrophic mire.In Ecology of a Subarctic Mire. Ed. M Sonesson. Ecol. Bull. 30, 209–234.

  23. Shaver G R and Chapin F S, III 1980 Response to fertilization by various plant growth forms in an Alaskan tundra: nutrient accumulation and growth. Ecology 61, 662–675.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tamm C O 1964 Growth ofHylocomium splendens in relation to tree canopy. Bryologist 67, 423–426.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tieszen L L, Lewis M C, Miller P C, Mayo J Chapin F S, III, and Oechel W 1981 An analysis of processes of primary production in tundra growth forms pp 285–356.In Tundra Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis. Eds. L C Bliss, O W Heal and J J Moore, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ulrich A and Gersper P L 1978 Plant nutrient limitations of tundra plant growth.In Vegetation and Production Ecology of an Alaskan Arctic Tundra. Ed. L L Tieszen. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Van Cleve K and Alexander V 1981 Nitrogen cycling in tundra and boreal ecosystems.In Terrestrial Nitrogen Cycles. Processes, Ecosystem Strategies, and Management Impacts. Eds. F E Clark and T Rosswall. Ecol. Bull. Stockholm 33, 375–404.

  28. Van Cleve K and White R 1980 Forest-floor nitrogen dynamics in a 60-year-old paper birch ecosystem in interior Alaska. Plant and Soil 54, 359–381.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weetman, G F and Timmer V 1967 Feather moss growth and nutrient content under upland black spruce. Tech. Rpt. 503, Pulp and Paper Res. Inst. Canada. 38 p.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wein R W and Bliss L C 1974 Primary production in arctic cottongrass tussock tundra communities. Arct. Alp. Res. 6, 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wielgolaski F E, Bliss L C, Svoboda J and Doyle G 1981 Primary production of tundra. pp 187–225.In Tundra Ecosystems: A comparative Analysis. Eds. L C Bliss, O W Heal and J J Moore. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marion, G.M., Miller, P.C., Kummerow, J. et al. Competition for nitrogen in a tussock tundra ecosystem. Plant Soil 66, 317–327 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02183798

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02183798

Key words

Navigation