Skip to main content
Log in

Urease activity and its Michaelis constant for soil systems

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Urea hydrolysis was measured in two separate sets of experiments. (1) Nine soil (0–15 cm) samples were treated with 200 μg of urea-N g−1 dry soil and incubated (at 37°C) at 50 per cent of the water holding capacity. Samples were periodically analysed for the remaining urea-N. The urease activity (time in hoursrequired to hydrolyse half the applied urea-N) was determined to be 5.8 to 15.2 hours in the various soils, which appeared to associate principally with the organic carbon content of the soils (r=−0.80**). (2) Three soils were treated with 25 to 2000 μg urea-N g−1 dry soil amounting to 0.9 to 72.0 mM urea in 1∶1 soil: solution. The system was buffered at pH 7.2 and agitated for 5h when the remaining urea-N was determined. The values of Km and Vmax were computed by two methods (i) from the integrated form of the Michaelis-Menten equation based on the results of the first study, and (ii) from the Michaelis-Menton equation based on urea hydrolysis in the second study. The integrated method appeared to be more suitable for enzyme kinetic studies in soil systems where the Km and Vmax values bore close relationship (r=−0.88**).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., Urease activity, ammonia volatilization and related microbiological aspects in some South African Soils. Proc. 36th Congr. S. Afr. Sugar Tech. Ass. 97–105 (1962).

  2. Bremmer, J. M. and Douglas, L. A., Effect of some urease inhibitors on urea hydrolysis in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.37, 225–226 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burns, R. G., Pukite, A. M. and McLaren, A. D., Concerning the location and persistence of soil Urease. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.36, 308–311 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burns, R. G., El-Sayed, M. H. and McLaren, A. D., Extraction of an urease active organo-complex from soil. Soil Biol. Biochem.4, 107–108 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chapman, H. D. and Lebig Jr., C. F., Field and laboratory studies on nitrite accumulation in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.16, 272–276 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conard, J. P., Catalytic activity causing the hydrolysis of urea in soils as influenced by several agronomic factors. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.5, 238–241 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delaune, R. D. and Patrick, Wm. H., Urea conversion to ammonia in waterlogged soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.34, 603–607 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Douglas, L. A. and Bremner, J. M., Extraction and colorimetric determination of urea in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.34, 859–862 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Douglas, L. A. and Bremner, J. M., A rapid method of evaluating different compounds as inhibitors of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem.3, 309–315 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Durand, G., Modifications de L'active de L'urease en presence de bentonite. C.R.H. Acad. Sci. Paris series D.259, 3397–4000cf Soils Fert.28, 155 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gasser, J. K. R., Urea as fertilizer. Soils Fert.27, 175–180 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gould, W. D., Cook, F. D. and Webster, C. R., Factors affecting urea hydrolysis in several Alberta soils. Plant and Soil38, 393–401 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laidler, K. J. and Bunting, P. S.,In the chemical Kinetics of Enzyme Action 2nd Edn. pp. 163–196. Oxford Clarendon Pr. (1973).

  14. McGarity, J. W. and Myers, M. C., A survey of urease activity in soils of Northern New South Wales. Plant and Soil27, 217–238 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  15. McLaren, A. D. and Packer, L., Some aspects of enzyme reactions in hetrogenous system. Adv. Enzymol.33, 245–308 (1970).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Myers, M. C. and McGarity, J. W., The urease activity in profiles of five great soil groups from Northern New South Wales. Plant and Soil28, 25–37 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paulson, K. N. and Kurtz, L. T., Locus of urease activity in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.33, 897–901 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paulson, K. N. and Kurtz, L. T., Michaelis constant of soil urease. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.34, 70–72 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roberge, M. R. and Knowless, R., Ureolysis immobilization and nitrification in black spruce humus. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.30, 201–204 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson, D. M. H. and Melsted, S. W., Urea hydrolysis and transformation in some illinois soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.27, 48–50 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singh, B. and Sekhon, G. S., Some measures of reducing leaching loss of nitrates beyond potential rooting zone. 1. Proper coordination of nitrogen splitting with water management. Plant and Soil44, 193–200 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Skujins, J. J., Enzymes in soils.In Soil Biochemistry-1, ed. A. D. McLaren and G. H. Peterson, 371–414 Marcel Dekker, New York. (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tabatabai, M. A., Michaelis constants of urease in soils and soil fractions. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc.37, 707–710 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Viraj, Beri, Ph.D. Dissertation, Transformation and Movement of Urea in Punjab Soils. Punjab Agric. Univ. Ludhiana (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beri, V., Goswami, K.P. & Brar, S.S. Urease activity and its Michaelis constant for soil systems. Plant Soil 49, 105–115 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02149912

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02149912

Keywords

Navigation