Skip to main content
Log in

Trophic interactions in soils as they affect energy and nutrient dynamics. IV. Flows of metabolic and biomass carbon

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flows of biomass and respiratory carbon were studied in a series of propylene-oxide sterilized soil microcosms. One-half of the microcosms received three pulsed additions of 200 ppm glucose-carbon to mimic rhizosphere carbon inputs. Biotic variables were: bacteria (Pseudomonas) alone, or amoebae (Acanthamoeba) and nematodes (Mesodiplogaster) singly, or both combined in the presence of bacteria.

Over the 24-day experiment, respiration was significantly higher in the microcosms containing the bacterial grazers. Biomass accumulation by amoebae was significantly higher than that by nematodes. The nematodes respired up to 30-fold more CO2 per unit biomass than did amoebae. Similar amounts of carbon flowed into both respiratory and biomass carbon in microcosms with fauna, compared with the bacteria-alone microcosms. However, partitioning of available carbon by the microfauna varied considerably, with little biomass production and relatively more CO2-C produced in the nematode-containing microcosms. The amoebae, in contrast, allocated more carbon to tissue production (about 40% assimilation efficiency) and correspondingly less to CO2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, R. V., E. T. Elliott, J. F. McClellan, D. C. Coleman, C. V. Cole, and H. W. Hunt: Trophic interactions in soils as they affect energy and nutrient dynamics. III. Biotic interactions of bacteria, amoebae, and nematodes: Microb. Ecol. (this volume)

  2. Boucher, G., and S. Chamroux: Bacteria and meiofauna in an experimental sand ecosystem. I. Material and preliminary results. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.24, 237–249 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, F. E.: Ecological associations among soil microorganisms. In: Soil Biology: Reviews of Research, pp. 125–161. UNESCO, Paris (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cole, C. V., E. T. Elliott, H. W. Hunt, D. C. Coleman and M. K. Campion: Trophic interactions in soils as they affect energy and nutrient dynamics. V. Phosphorus transformations. Microb. Ecol. (this volume)

  5. Coleman, D. C.: Compartmental analysis of total soil respiration. Oikos24, 361–366 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Danforth, W. F.: Respiratory metabolism. In: T. Chen (Ed.): Research in Protozoology, Vol. 1, pp. 201–306. Pergamon Press, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dittmer, J. C., and M. A. Wells: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of lipids and lipid components. In: J. M. Lowenstein (Ed.): Methods of Enzymology: Vol. 14, Lipids, pp. 482–523. Academic Press, New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fenchel, T. M., and B. B. Jorgenson: Detritus food chains of aquatic ecosystems: the role of bacteria. In: M. Alexander (Ed.): Advances in Microbial Ecology, Vol. 1, pp. 1–58. Plenum Press, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu, L., C. T. Youngberg, and C. M. Gilmour: Readily oxidizable carbon: an index of decomposition and humification of forest litter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.36, 959–961 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klekowski, R. Z., L. Wasilewska, and E. Paplinska: Oxygen consumption by soil-inhabiting nematodes. Nematologica18, 391–403 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Macfadyen, A.: The contribution of the microfauna to total soil metabolism. In: J. Doeksen and J. van der Drift (Eds.): Soil Organisms, pp. 3–17. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marchant, R., and W. L. Nicholas: An energy budget for the free-living nematodePelodera (Rhabditidae). Oecologia16, 237–252 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McGill, W. B., E. A. Paul, J. A. Shields, and W. E. Lowe: Turnover of microbial populations and their metabolites in soils. Bull. Ecol. Res. Comm. (Stockh.)17, 293–301 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nicholas, W. L., and S. Viswanathan: A study of the nutrition ofCaenorhabditis briggsae (Rhabditidae) fed on14C and32P-labelled bacteria. Nematologica21, 385–400 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shields, J. A., W. E. Lowe, E. A. Paul, and D. Parkinson: Turnover of microbial tissue in soil under field conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem.5, 753–764 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sollins, P. L., D. C. Coleman, B. S. Ausmus, and K. Cromack: A new ecology? A view from within. Ecology57, 1101–1103 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stotzky, G., and A. G. Norman: Factors limiting microbial activities in soil. I. The level of substrate, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Arch. Mikrobiol.40, 341–369 (1961)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Waksman, S. A. and R. L. Starkey: Microbiological analysis of soil as an index of soil fertility. VII. Carbon dioxide evolution. Soil Sci.17, 141–161 (1924)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, D.C., Anderson, R.V., Cole, C.V. et al. Trophic interactions in soils as they affect energy and nutrient dynamics. IV. Flows of metabolic and biomass carbon. Microb Ecol 4, 373–380 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013280

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013280

Keywords

Navigation