Skip to main content
Log in

Development of generic models for ambulatory vaginal surgery — a preliminary report

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generic guidelines are applied to reconstructive vaginal operations, so as to convert them to ambulatory procedures. Prototype operations are described and analyzed. These included conceptualizing vaginal prolapse as a type of intussusception caused by vaginal and ligamentous laxity in the middle or posterior parts of the vagina; the avoidance of vaginal excision, excessive tension, and refashioning excess vaginal tissue from width to length or into a partial double-layered repair; the creation of artificial neoligaments; the prevention of urinary retention by avoiding tightness in the bladder neck area; local anesthetic infiltration; and buttressing vaginal tissue during wound healing. A total of 108 patients underwent vaginal surgery on an ambulatory or overnight stay basis, 72 under local anesthesia/midazolam. Minimal postoperative pain and the absence of catheterization reduced hospital stay from a statewide mean of 8 days to 1 day, and return to normal activities from 6 weeks to 7–10 days. Cure rates (18 months) were: uterovaginal prolapse 22/22, infracoccygeal sacropexy 21/23, rectocele 36/38, cystocele/anterior vaginal wall prolapse 21/25. Applied as prototypes to reconstructive vaginal surgery, the operations appear to be as effective as traditional techniques but far less invasive. They have the potential to assist working mothers, the old and infirm, and save the community up to $5,500 per patient. It is hoped that the generic models presented may act as a basis for the future development of ambulatory vaginal surgical techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nichols DH, Randall CL Vaginal surgery, 3rd edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989;1–46

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fothergill WE. Pathology and the operative treatment of displacements of the pelvic viscera.J Obstet Gynaecol Br Empire 1907; 13:410–419

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paramore RH. The supports in chief of the female pelvic viscera.J Obstet Gynaecol Br Empire 1908; 30:391–409

    Google Scholar 

  4. Petros PE, Ulmsten U. Role of the pelvic floor in bladder neck opening and closure: II vagina.Int Urogynecol J 1997; 8:69–73

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petros PE, Ulmsten U. Role of the pelvic floor in bladder neck opening and closure: I muscle forces.Int Urogynecol J 1997; 8:74–80

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Lancey JOL. Anatomic aspects functional anatomy of the pelvic floor and urinary continence mechanism in pelvic floor re-education Schussler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton S, eds. London: Springer-Verlag, 1994:9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richardson AC, Lyon JB, Williams NL. A new look at pelvic relaxation.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126:568–572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shull BL, Capen CV, Riggs MW, Kuehl TJ. Preoperative and postoperative analysis of site-specific pelvic support defects in 81 women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction.J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166:1764–1771

    Google Scholar 

  9. White GR. Cystocoele.JAMA 1909; 53:1707–1709

    Google Scholar 

  10. Douglas DM. The healing of aponeurotic incisions.Br J Surg 1952; 40:79–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peacock EE. Structure, synthesis and interaction of fibrous protein and matrix. In: Peacock EE, ed. Wound repair, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1984;56–101

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yamada H. Mechanical properties of urogenital organs and tissues. In: Evans FG, ed. Strength of biological materials. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1970;205–218, 272–280

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nordin M. Biomechanics of collagenous tissues. In: Frankel VH, Nordin M, eds. Basic biomechanics of the skeletal system. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1980:87–110

    Google Scholar 

  14. Petros PE, Ulmsten U, Papadimitriou J. The autogenic neoligament procedure: a technique for planned formation of an artificial neo-ligament.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990; 69(Suppl 153):43–51

    Google Scholar 

  15. Petros PE. The intravaginal slingplasty operation, and minimally invasive technique for cure of urinary incontinence in the female.Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 36:453–461

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krantz K. The anatomy and physiology of the vulva and vagina and the anatomy of the urethra and bladder. In: Philipp EE, Barnes J, Newton M, William H, eds. Scientific foundation of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2nd edn. Philadelphia, William Heineman Medical Books Ltd 65–78

  17. Van Winkle W, Hastings JC. Considerations in the choice of suture material for various tissues.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972; 135:113–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Salthouse TM. Biological response to sutures.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980; 88:658–664

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeffcoate TNA. Principles of gynaecology. 2nd edn. London: Butterworths, 1962

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Editorial Comment: Although the preliminary reports by the author on this small series of cases is encouraging, confirmation of the applicable usefulness of these techniques and their results and problems created over time will be awaited from other surgeons employing them in sufficient volume. Each of the innovative concepts mentioned is not as simple as it looks on the surface, and requires conviction, precise anatomic knowledge and experience to back enthusiasm with effective performance. Fundamentally the concepts relate to identification of weak or inadequate ligamentous support, treated by reinforcement or replacement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petros, P.E.P. Development of generic models for ambulatory vaginal surgery — a preliminary report. Int Urogynecol J 9, 19–27 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01900537

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01900537

Keywords

Navigation