Abstract
The capacity of oral cholecystography (OCG), real-time ultrasound (RUS), and computed tomography (CT) to detect gallstones and to analyze their size, number, and composition was tested preoperatively in 37 patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy. Gallbladder response to a standard meal was also evaluated by OCG and RUS. Gallstones were analyzed chemically for calcium, cholesterol, and bilirubin content. The results show that RUS is the most valuable test for detecting gallstones and is similar to OCG in measuring their size and number, whereas CT underestimates the stone size. Gallbladder function in terms of contractability can be evaluated by RUS and OCG, but RUS provides useful information even if the gallbladder is not opacified at OCG. CT is more accurate than OCG in detecting the presence of calcium, and CT attenuation numbers are positively correlated with calcium content of the stone (r=0.87,p<0.01).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Simeone JF, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT. Nonsurgical therapy of gallstones: implications for imaging.AJR 1989;152:11–17
Abell LL, Levy BB, Brodie BB, Kendall FE. A simplified method for estimation of total cholesterol in serum and demonstration of its specificity.J Biol Chem 1952;195:357–366
Michaelssonn M. Bilirubin determination in serum and urine. Studies on diazo methods and a new copper-diazo pigment method.Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1961;56(Suppl):40–50
Berk RN. Radiology of the gallbladder. In. Margulis AR Burhenne HJ eds.Alimentary tract radiology. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1983:1434–1442
Bartlett MS. The use of transformations.Biometrics 1947;3:39–52
Wilkinson L.Systat: the system for statistics. Evanson, IL: SYSTAT, Inc., 1986
Metha CR. StatXact. Version 1.00. Cambridge, MA: Cytel Software Corporation, 1989
Crade M, Taylor KJW, Rosenfield AT, deGraaff CS, Minhian P. Surgical and pathologic correlation of cholecystosonography and cholescystography.AJR 1978;131:227–229
Rome Group for the Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Radiologic appearance of gallstones and its relationship with biliary symptoms and awareness of having gallstones: observations during epidemiological studies.Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:349–353, 1987
Mujahed Z, Evans JA, Whalen JP. The nonopacified gallbladder on oral cholecystography.Radiology 1974;112:1–7
Barakos JA, Rails PW, Lapin SA, Johnson MB, Randall Radin D, Colletti PM, Boswell WD, Halls JM. Cholelithiasis: evaluation with CT.Radiology 1987;162:415–418
Brakel K, Lameris JS, Nijs HGT, Terpstra OT, Steen G, Blijenberg BC. Predicting gallstone composition with CT: in vitro and in vivo study.Radiology 1990;174:337–341
Toombs BD, Sander CM, Conoley PM. Computed tomography of the nonvisualizing gallbladder.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1980;5:164–168
Mathienson JR, So CB, Malone DE, Becker CD, Burhenne HJ. Accuracy of sonography for determining the number and size of gallbladder stones before and after lithotripsy.AJR 1989;153:977–980
Brink JA, Simeone JF, Mueller PR, Saini S, Tung GA, Spell NO, Ferrucci JT. Routine sonographic techniques fail to quantify gallstone size and number: a retrospecific study of 111 surgically proved cases.AJR 1989;153:503–506
Janowitz P, Zoller A, Swobodnik W, Wechsler JG, Schumacher KA, Ditschuneit H. Computed tomography evaluation of radiolucent gallstones in vivo.Gastrointest Radiol 1990;15:58–60
Baron RL, Rohrmann CA Jr, Lee SP, Shuman WP, Teefey SA. CT evaluation of gallstones in vitro: correlation with chemical analysis.AJR 1988;151:1123–1128
Everson GT, Braverman DZ, Johnson MJ, Kern F Jr. A critical evaluation of real-time ultrasonography for the study of gallbladder volume and contraction.Gastroenterology 1980;79:40–46
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marzio, L., Innocenti, P., Genovesi, N. et al. Role of oral cholecystography, real-time ultrasound, and CT in evaluation of gallstones and gallbladder function. Gastrointest Radiol 17, 257–261 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888562
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888562