Abstract
Event history models for aggregate units such as households are complicated by the fact that such entities do not have a well-defined identity through time. The difficulties of applying conventional transition-based models to household change are discussed. More generally, what constitutes ‘time’ and ‘change’ are also considered. It is argued that many changes occurring within households such as leaving home are better-considered as ‘fuzzy’ than crisp phenomena. An alternative perspective based on household change considered as an evolving network is proposed. The implications for sample designs which are designed to track explicithousehold dynamics (such as the Panel Study on Income Dynamics) are discussed. The ways in which particular forms of analysis come to dominate the scientific literature, including those for analysing household change is discussed in relation to non-linear dynamic models. Finally, it is argued that there would be considerable benefits if insights available from the physical, mathematical and biological sciences were to be more widely incorporated within technical demography.
Résumé
Les modèles d'analyse biographique d'unités agrégées, telles que les ménages, sont complexes, car ces entités ne peuvent être définies avec précision au cours du temps. Nous discutons ici les difficultés d'appliquer les modèles habituels basés sur des transitions, aux changements connus par les ménages. Plus généralement, nous analysons ce qui constitue «le temps» et le «changement». Nous montrons ainsi que de nombreux changements connus par les ménages, tels que la décohabitation, sont mieux saisis comme des évévements «flous» plutôt que comme des événements ponctuels. Nous proposons dès lors une autre perspective, basée sur les changements survenus dans des réseaux en évolution. Nous en discutons les implications sur les méthodes d'échantillonnage destinées à tracer l'évolution explicite des ménages (telles que l'étude par panel sur l'évolution des revenus). Les façons selon lesquelles certaines formes d'analyse en viennent à avoir une position dominante dans la littérature scientifique, y compris celles qui permettent l'analyse des changements dans les ménages, sont discutées en liaison avec les modèles dynamiques non-linéaires. Finalement, nous montrons qu'il y a des avantages importants à ce que des approches suivies dans les sciences physiques, mathématiques et biologiques, soient plus largement introduites dans les techniques d'analyse démographique.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur, B., 1990. ‘Positive feedbacks in the economy’,Scientific American (February, 1990) 262: 80–85.
Atkins, P. W., 1992.Creation Revisited. W.H. Freeman, New York.
Bateson, P. (ed.), 1983.Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Blake, J., 1968. ‘Are babies consumer durables?’,Population Studies 22(1): 5–27.
Blossfeld, H.-P. and Rohwer, G., 1995.Techniques of Event History Analysis: New Approaches to Causal Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ.
Brown, C., 1995a.Chaos and Catastrophe Theories —Sage Series Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No.107. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.
Brown, C., 1995b.Serpents in the Sand: Essays on the Nonlinear Nature of Politics and Human Destiny. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Bumpass, L., 1991. Emerging issues in demographic research in the United States, in M. Murphy and J. Hobcraft (eds),Population Research in Britain: Supplement to Population Studies 45. Population Investigation Committee, London, 177–188.
Caselli, G., Cerbara, L. and Leti, G., 1993. ‘The geography of adult mortality: results from the fuzzy clumping method’,Genus 49(1–2): 1–24.
Carey, J. R., 1993.Applied Demography for Biologists. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Clark, G., 1992.Space, Time and Man: a Prehistorian's View. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Coale, A. J. and Watkins, S. C. (eds), 1986.The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
Courgeau, D. and Lelièvre, E., 1988. ‘Estimation of transition rates in dynamic household models’, in N. Keilman, A. Kuijsten and A. Vossen (eds),Modelling Household Formation and Dissolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 160–176.
Coveney, P. and Highfield, R., 1995.Frontiers of Complexity: the Search for Order in a Chaotic World. Faber and Faber, London.
Davies, P. C. W. and Brown, J., 1988.Superstrings: a Theory of Everything? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Davis, D. D. and Holt, C. A., 1992.Experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
Dawkins, R., 1986.The Blind Watchmaker. Longman, London.
Dennett, D. C., 1991.Consciousness Explained. Little, Brown and Co, Boston.
DiPrete, T. A. and Forristal, J. D., 1994. ‘Multilevel models: methods and substance’,Annual Review of Sociology 20: 331–357.
Doreian, P., 1988. ‘Mapping networks through time’. Paper presented at MASO Conference on Network Analysis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elder, G. H. Jr., 1978. ‘Family history and the life course’, in T. K. Hareven (ed),Transitions: the family and the life course in historical perspective. Academic Press, New York, 17–64.
Elo, I. T. and Preston, S. H., 1992. ‘Effects of early-life conditions on adult mortality: a review’,Population Index 58: 186–212.
Feynmann, R. P., 1985.QED: the Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
Fisher, R., 1930.The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Fortes, M., 1958. ‘Introduction’, in J. Goody (ed),The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–14.
Foster, K., Jackson, B., Thomas, M., Hunter, P. and Bennnett, N., 1995.General Household Survey 1993. H.M.S.O., London.
Gell, A., 1992.The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps. Berg, Oxford/Providence.
Gell-Mann, M., 1994.The Quark and the Jaguar. Little, Brown and Co., London.
Goody, J. (ed), 1958.The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Greenhalgh, S. (ed), 1995.Situating fertility: anthropology and demographic inquiry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Halpern, J. M. and Wagner, R. A., 1984. ‘Time and social structure: a Yugoslav case study’,Journal of Family History 9(3): 229–244.
Hammell, E. A., 1972. ‘The Zadruga as process’, in P. Laslett and R. Wall (eds),Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 335–374.
Hill, M. S., 1992.The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: A User's Guide. Sage, Newbury Park.
Hofstadter, D. R., 1979.Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid. Harvester, Sussex.
Hoyle, F. and Wickramasinghe, N. C. 1981.Evolution from Space. Dent, London.
Jones, S., 1993.The Language of the Genes. Harper Collins, London.
Kalbfleisch, J. D. and Prentice, R. L., 1980.The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. John Wiley, New York.
Kauffman, S., 1993.The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kauffman, S., 1995.At Home in the Universe: the Search for Laws of Self-organization and Complexity. Viking, London.
Kosko, B., 1994.Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic. Harper Collins, London.
Landsberg, P. T. (ed), 1982.The Enigma of Time. Adam Hilger, Bristol.
Laslett, P., 1972. ‘Introduction’, in P. Laslett and R. Wall (eds),Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–89.
Lesthaeghe, R. and Wilson, C., 1986. ‘Modes of production, secularization and the pace of fertility decline in Western Europe 1870–1930’, in A. J. Coale and S. C. Watkins (eds),The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 261–292.
Lesthaeghe, R., 1995. ‘The Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: an Interpretation’, in K. O. Mason and A.-M. Jensen (eds),Gender and Family Change in Developed Societies. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 17–62.
Lorentz, K., 1963.On aggression. Harcourt, Brace and World Inc., New York.
Macmillan, D. B. and Herriott, R. A., 1985. ‘Towards a longitudinal definition of households’,Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 13: 349–360.
Mainzer, K., 1994.Thinking in complexity: the complex dynamics of matter, mind and mankind. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Manton, K. G., Woodbury, M. A. and Tolley, H. D., 1994.Statistical Applications Using Fuzzy Sets. John Wiley, New York.
Marsden, P. V., 1990. ‘Network data and measurement’,Annual Review of Sociology 16: 435–463.
Murphy, M., 1995. ‘The collection and comparability of demographic and social data in Europe: the family life cycle’, in J. Duchêne and G. Wunsch (eds),Collect et comparabilité des données démographiques et sociales en Europe, Chair Quetelet 1991. Academia/L'Harmattan, Louvainla-Neuve, 149–182.
Netting, R. McC., Wilk, R. R. and Arnould, E. J., 1984.Households: Comparative and Historical Studies of the Domestic Group. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Newton-Smith, W. H., 1980.The Structure of Time. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Ní Bhrolcháin, M., 1992. ‘Period paramount? A critique of the cohort approach to fertility’,Population and Development Review 18: 599–629.
Penrose, R., 1989.The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Penrose. R., 1994.Shadows of the Mind: the Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Peterson, I., 1993.Newton's Clock: Chaos in the Solar System. W.H. Freeman, New York.
Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I., 1984.Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam, USA.
Purves, W. K., Orains, G. H. and Heller, H. C., 1995.Life: the Science of Biology. W.H. Freeman, New York.
Rodríguez, G. and Goldman, N., 1995. ‘An assessment of estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary responses’,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A 15: 73–89.
Rowe, D. C., 1994.The limits of family influence, genes, experience and behavior. Guilford, New York.
Schroeder, M., 1991.Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws. W.H. Freeman, New York.
Tan, L., 1991. ‘Analysis of fuzzy classification of women's status in China’,Chinese Journal of Population Science 3(1): 69–73.
Toffler, A., 1984. ‘Foreword: Science and change’, in I. Prigogine and I. Stengers (eds),Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam, USA, xi-xxvi.
Townsend, N., 1996. ‘Men, migration, and households in Botswana’. Unpublished manuscript PTSC, Brown University, Providence RI, USA.
United Nations Statistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe Conference of European Statisticians, 1987.Recommendations for the 1990 Censuses of Population and Housing in the ECE Region. Regional Variants of the world recommendations for the 1990 round of population and housing censuses.Statistical Standards and Studies No40. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, New York.
Vilquin, E. (ed), 1994.Le temps et la démographie: Chaire Queletet 1993. Academia/L'Harmattan, Louvain-la-Neuve.
Wachter, K. W., 1991. ‘Elusive cycles: are there dynamically possible Lee-Easterlin models for U.S. births?’,Population Studies 45(1): 109–135.
Ward, M., 1995. ‘Butterflies and Bifurcations: Can Chaos Theory Contribute to our Understanding of Family Systems?’,Journal of Marriage and the Family 57: 629–638.
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K., 1994.Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Weesie, J. and Flap, H. (eds), 1990.Social networks through time. University of Utrecht/ISOR, Utrecht.
Willekens, F., 1988. ‘A life course perspective on household dynamics’, in N. Keilman, A. Kuijsten and A. Vossen (eds),Modelling Household Formation and Dissolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 87–107.
Wilson, E. O., 1975.Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, Harvard.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, M. The dynamic household as a logical concept and its use in demography. Eur J Population 12, 363–381 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01796913
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01796913