Skip to main content
Log in

The dynamic household as a logical concept and its use in demography

Le Ménage en dynamique comme concept logique et son utilisation en démographie

  • Published:
European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Event history models for aggregate units such as households are complicated by the fact that such entities do not have a well-defined identity through time. The difficulties of applying conventional transition-based models to household change are discussed. More generally, what constitutes ‘time’ and ‘change’ are also considered. It is argued that many changes occurring within households such as leaving home are better-considered as ‘fuzzy’ than crisp phenomena. An alternative perspective based on household change considered as an evolving network is proposed. The implications for sample designs which are designed to track explicithousehold dynamics (such as the Panel Study on Income Dynamics) are discussed. The ways in which particular forms of analysis come to dominate the scientific literature, including those for analysing household change is discussed in relation to non-linear dynamic models. Finally, it is argued that there would be considerable benefits if insights available from the physical, mathematical and biological sciences were to be more widely incorporated within technical demography.

Résumé

Les modèles d'analyse biographique d'unités agrégées, telles que les ménages, sont complexes, car ces entités ne peuvent être définies avec précision au cours du temps. Nous discutons ici les difficultés d'appliquer les modèles habituels basés sur des transitions, aux changements connus par les ménages. Plus généralement, nous analysons ce qui constitue «le temps» et le «changement». Nous montrons ainsi que de nombreux changements connus par les ménages, tels que la décohabitation, sont mieux saisis comme des évévements «flous» plutôt que comme des événements ponctuels. Nous proposons dès lors une autre perspective, basée sur les changements survenus dans des réseaux en évolution. Nous en discutons les implications sur les méthodes d'échantillonnage destinées à tracer l'évolution explicite des ménages (telles que l'étude par panel sur l'évolution des revenus). Les façons selon lesquelles certaines formes d'analyse en viennent à avoir une position dominante dans la littérature scientifique, y compris celles qui permettent l'analyse des changements dans les ménages, sont discutées en liaison avec les modèles dynamiques non-linéaires. Finalement, nous montrons qu'il y a des avantages importants à ce que des approches suivies dans les sciences physiques, mathématiques et biologiques, soient plus largement introduites dans les techniques d'analyse démographique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, B., 1990. ‘Positive feedbacks in the economy’,Scientific American (February, 1990) 262: 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, P. W., 1992.Creation Revisited. W.H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, P. (ed.), 1983.Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J., 1968. ‘Are babies consumer durables?’,Population Studies 22(1): 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P. and Rohwer, G., 1995.Techniques of Event History Analysis: New Approaches to Causal Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., 1995a.Chaos and Catastrophe TheoriesSage Series Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No.107. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., 1995b.Serpents in the Sand: Essays on the Nonlinear Nature of Politics and Human Destiny. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L., 1991. Emerging issues in demographic research in the United States, in M. Murphy and J. Hobcraft (eds),Population Research in Britain: Supplement to Population Studies 45. Population Investigation Committee, London, 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caselli, G., Cerbara, L. and Leti, G., 1993. ‘The geography of adult mortality: results from the fuzzy clumping method’,Genus 49(1–2): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. R., 1993.Applied Demography for Biologists. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G., 1992.Space, Time and Man: a Prehistorian's View. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J. and Watkins, S. C. (eds), 1986.The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D. and Lelièvre, E., 1988. ‘Estimation of transition rates in dynamic household models’, in N. Keilman, A. Kuijsten and A. Vossen (eds),Modelling Household Formation and Dissolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 160–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coveney, P. and Highfield, R., 1995.Frontiers of Complexity: the Search for Order in a Chaotic World. Faber and Faber, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. C. W. and Brown, J., 1988.Superstrings: a Theory of Everything? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D. and Holt, C. A., 1992.Experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R., 1986.The Blind Watchmaker. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C., 1991.Consciousness Explained. Little, Brown and Co, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPrete, T. A. and Forristal, J. D., 1994. ‘Multilevel models: methods and substance’,Annual Review of Sociology 20: 331–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doreian, P., 1988. ‘Mapping networks through time’. Paper presented at MASO Conference on Network Analysis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

  • Elder, G. H. Jr., 1978. ‘Family history and the life course’, in T. K. Hareven (ed),Transitions: the family and the life course in historical perspective. Academic Press, New York, 17–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo, I. T. and Preston, S. H., 1992. ‘Effects of early-life conditions on adult mortality: a review’,Population Index 58: 186–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynmann, R. P., 1985.QED: the Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., 1930.The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortes, M., 1958. ‘Introduction’, in J. Goody (ed),The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, K., Jackson, B., Thomas, M., Hunter, P. and Bennnett, N., 1995.General Household Survey 1993. H.M.S.O., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A., 1992.The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps. Berg, Oxford/Providence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M., 1994.The Quark and the Jaguar. Little, Brown and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (ed), 1958.The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (ed), 1995.Situating fertility: anthropology and demographic inquiry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J. M. and Wagner, R. A., 1984. ‘Time and social structure: a Yugoslav case study’,Journal of Family History 9(3): 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammell, E. A., 1972. ‘The Zadruga as process’, in P. Laslett and R. Wall (eds),Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 335–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. S., 1992.The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: A User's Guide. Sage, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. R., 1979.Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid. Harvester, Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, F. and Wickramasinghe, N. C. 1981.Evolution from Space. Dent, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., 1993.The Language of the Genes. Harper Collins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch, J. D. and Prentice, R. L., 1980.The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S., 1993.The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S., 1995.At Home in the Universe: the Search for Laws of Self-organization and Complexity. Viking, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosko, B., 1994.Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic. Harper Collins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, P. T. (ed), 1982.The Enigma of Time. Adam Hilger, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, P., 1972. ‘Introduction’, in P. Laslett and R. Wall (eds),Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. and Wilson, C., 1986. ‘Modes of production, secularization and the pace of fertility decline in Western Europe 1870–1930’, in A. J. Coale and S. C. Watkins (eds),The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 261–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R., 1995. ‘The Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: an Interpretation’, in K. O. Mason and A.-M. Jensen (eds),Gender and Family Change in Developed Societies. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 17–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorentz, K., 1963.On aggression. Harcourt, Brace and World Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, D. B. and Herriott, R. A., 1985. ‘Towards a longitudinal definition of households’,Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 13: 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainzer, K., 1994.Thinking in complexity: the complex dynamics of matter, mind and mankind. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, K. G., Woodbury, M. A. and Tolley, H. D., 1994.Statistical Applications Using Fuzzy Sets. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V., 1990. ‘Network data and measurement’,Annual Review of Sociology 16: 435–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M., 1995. ‘The collection and comparability of demographic and social data in Europe: the family life cycle’, in J. Duchêne and G. Wunsch (eds),Collect et comparabilité des données démographiques et sociales en Europe, Chair Quetelet 1991. Academia/L'Harmattan, Louvainla-Neuve, 149–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R. McC., Wilk, R. R. and Arnould, E. J., 1984.Households: Comparative and Historical Studies of the Domestic Group. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton-Smith, W. H., 1980.The Structure of Time. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Bhrolcháin, M., 1992. ‘Period paramount? A critique of the cohort approach to fertility’,Population and Development Review 18: 599–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R., 1989.The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose. R., 1994.Shadows of the Mind: the Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, I., 1993.Newton's Clock: Chaos in the Solar System. W.H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I., 1984.Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purves, W. K., Orains, G. H. and Heller, H. C., 1995.Life: the Science of Biology. W.H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, G. and Goldman, N., 1995. ‘An assessment of estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary responses’,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A 15: 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. C., 1994.The limits of family influence, genes, experience and behavior. Guilford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, M., 1991.Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws. W.H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, L., 1991. ‘Analysis of fuzzy classification of women's status in China’,Chinese Journal of Population Science 3(1): 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A., 1984. ‘Foreword: Science and change’, in I. Prigogine and I. Stengers (eds),Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam, USA, xi-xxvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, N., 1996. ‘Men, migration, and households in Botswana’. Unpublished manuscript PTSC, Brown University, Providence RI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Statistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe Conference of European Statisticians, 1987.Recommendations for the 1990 Censuses of Population and Housing in the ECE Region. Regional Variants of the world recommendations for the 1990 round of population and housing censuses.Statistical Standards and Studies No40. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilquin, E. (ed), 1994.Le temps et la démographie: Chaire Queletet 1993. Academia/L'Harmattan, Louvain-la-Neuve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachter, K. W., 1991. ‘Elusive cycles: are there dynamically possible Lee-Easterlin models for U.S. births?’,Population Studies 45(1): 109–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M., 1995. ‘Butterflies and Bifurcations: Can Chaos Theory Contribute to our Understanding of Family Systems?’,Journal of Marriage and the Family 57: 629–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S. and Faust, K., 1994.Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weesie, J. and Flap, H. (eds), 1990.Social networks through time. University of Utrecht/ISOR, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F., 1988. ‘A life course perspective on household dynamics’, in N. Keilman, A. Kuijsten and A. Vossen (eds),Modelling Household Formation and Dissolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O., 1975.Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, M. The dynamic household as a logical concept and its use in demography. Eur J Population 12, 363–381 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01796913

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01796913

Keywords

Navigation