Abstract
An assay based on derivative analysis of thermal denaturation (melting) behavior of reassociated DNA was developed in an attempt to characterize the sequence relationships in repeated DNA families according to the homogeneous or heterogeneous models of Bendich and Anderson (1977). The validity of the technique was confirmed by the use of deaminatedEscherichia coli DNA models for repetitive families. The melting data for DNA reassociated at two different temperatures provided strong evidence thatPisum sativum repeated families are mostly heterogeneous, while homogeneous families predominate inVigna radiata. These findings, together with other differences between the two genomes, suggest that the rate of sequence amplification has been higher in the evolutionary history ofPisum DNA. A general trend seems to exist for high amplification rates in large, highly repetitive plant genomes such asPisum and lower rates in smaller plant genomes such asVigna, as well as in the generally smaller, less repetitive genomes of most animal species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- (Et)4NCl:
-
tetraethylammonium chloride
- C0t:
-
the product of molar concentration of DNA nucleotides and time of incubation (mol s/L)
- PIPES:
-
1,4-piperazinedietha-nesulfonic acid
- Tm :
-
the temperature at which half of the nucleotides in solution are unpaired
- SSC:
-
150 mM NaCl-15 mM sodium citrate
- HAP:
-
hydroxylapatite
- NTP:
-
nucleotide pairs
References
Bedbrook JR, Jones J, O'Dell M, Thompson RD, Flavell RB (1980) Cell 19:545–560
Bendich AJ, Anderson RS (1977) Biochem 16:4655–4663
Bennett MD, Smith JB (1976) Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B 274:227–273
Bouchard RA, Swift H (1977) Chomosoma 61:317–333
Britten RJ, Graham DE, Neufeld BR(1974) In: Grossman L, Moldave K (eds) Methods in Enzymology 29, Part E. Nucleic Acids and Protein Synthesis. Academic Press, New York, p 363
Britten RJ, Kohne DE (1968) Science 161:529–540
Cuellar RE, Ford GA, Briggs WR, Thompson WF (1978) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:6026–6030
Flavell RB, Rimpau J, Smith DB (1977) Chromosoma 63:205–222
Flavell RB, Bedbrook J, Jones J, O'Dell M, Gerlach WL, Dyer TA, Thompson RD (1980) In: Davies DR, Hopwood DA (eds) The Plant Genome. John Innes Charity, Norwich, UK, p 15
Hinegardner R (1976) In: Ayala FJ (ed) Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, p 179
Marsh JL, McCarthy BJ (1974) Biochem 13:3382–3388
Martinson HG, Wagenaar EB (1974) Anal Biochem 61:144–154
Martinson HG, Wagenaar EB (1977) Biochim Biophys Acta 474:445–455
Mizuno S, Andrews C, MacGregor HC (1976) Chromosoma 58:1–31
Moore GP, Scheller RH, Davidson EH, Britten RJ (1978) Cell 15:649–660
Murray MG, Cuellar RE, Thompson WF (1978) Biochem 17:5781–5790
Murray MG, Palmer JD, Cuellar RE, Thompson WF (1979) Biochem 18:5259–5266
Murray MG, Peters DA, Thompson WF (1980) J Mol Evol (in press)
Preisler RS, Thompson WF (1980) J Mol Evol
Rimpau J, Smith DB, Flavell RB (1978) J Mol Biol 123:327–359
Smith MJ, Britten RJ, Davidson EH (1975) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:4805–4809
Thompson WF (1978) Carnegie Inst Washington Yearb 77:310–316
Thompson EF, Murray MG (1980a) In: Davies DR, Hopwood DA (eds) The Plant Genome. John Innes Charity, Norwich, UK, p 31
Thompson WF, Murray MG (1980b) In: Marcus A (ed) The Biochemistry of Plants: A Comprehensive Treatise VI. Academic Press, New York (in press)
Ullman JS, McCarthy BJ (1973) Biochim Biophys Acta 294:416–424
Wetmur JG (1976) Ann Rev Biophys Bioeng 5:337–361
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication No. 709 and is based on a portion of a dissertation submitted by R.S.P. in partial fulfillment of the Ph. D. requirements at Stanford University
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Preisler, R.S., Thompson, W.F. Evolutionary sequence divergence within repeated DNA families of higher plant genomes. J Mol Evol 17, 85–93 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01732678
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01732678