Skip to main content
Log in

The varieties of resistance in group psychotherapy considered from the viewpoint of adaptation

  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Resistance in group therapy in particular was considered from the point of view that the unchanging behavior reveals the patient's generalized mode of adaptation utilized to maintain stability and avoid anxiety while achieving his goals. “Constitutional” resistance (I.) refers to the imprecise response of the nervous and vegetative systems to changing circumstances, divisible into (A) genetic lag and (B) cognitive styles, with clinical manifestations of chronic posicatastrophic stress reaction, certain psychosomatic phenomena, and perceptual distortions such as defective reception, attribution, and projection. “Dynamic Maintenance of Stability” (II.) is subdivided into (A) The self-signaling system: feeling of weakness; blaming others; and (B) overt-social-manipulative efforts: (1) Learned role as a patient: passivity; and (2) Unwillingness to yield infantile gratification: weak motivation; pseudoparticipation; defective transmission; nonverbal behavior; character armoring; disturbing activities; and, transference. The topic is approached as an extension of the biological theory of adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ackerman, N. W.: Symptom, defense and growth in group process. Int. J. Group Psychother., 11: 131–142, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, H. C., and Tuddenham, R. D.: Persistent stress reaction after combat. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 12: 475–481, 1965.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, M. L.: Acting out in individual and group psychotherapy. J. Hillside Hosp., 13: 1, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, G. R.: Intensive Group Psychotherapy. Ronald. New York. 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, J. V.: Psychophysiology of emotional behavior. In: Experimental Foundations of Clinical Psychology. A. J. Bachrach, editor. Basic Books. New York. 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cofer, C. and Appley, H.: Motivation: Theory and Research. Wiley. New York. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollard, J., and Miller, N.: Personality and Psychotherapy. McGraw-Hill. New York. 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel, O.: The Psychonalytic Theory of Neuroses. Norton. New York. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1911): Formulations concerning the two principles in mental functioning. In: Collected Papers. Vol. 4, pp. 13–21. Hogarth. London. 1950. Basic Books. New York. 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: (1937) Analysis terminable and interminable.ibid.. Vol. 5, pp. 316–357. Hogarth. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Three contributions to the theory of sex. In: The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud. A. A. Brill, editor. Modern Library. New York. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Liveright. New York. 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Edrita: Some aspects of group dynamics and the analysis of transference and defenses. Int. J. Group Psychother., 15: 44–56, 1965.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glatzer, Henriette T.: Handling narcissistic problems in group psychotherapy. Int. J. Group Psychother., 12: 448–455, 1962.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, P. C.: Experimental investigation of selective memory and the concept of repression and defense: a theoretical synthesis. J. Abnor. and Soc. Psychol., 69: 365–380, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M.; Marks, M., and Rockberger, H.: Resistance in group psychotherapy enhanced by the countertransference reactions of the therapist: a peer group experience. Int. J. Group Psychother., 14: 332–343, 1964.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harker, Janet E.: Diurnal rhythms in the animal kingdom. Biology Reviews, 33: 1–52, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, H. F.: The formation of learning sets. Psychol. Rev. 56: 51–65, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, W.: The most complex material in all nature. In: Reflexes to Intelligence: A Reader in Clinical Psychology. S. J. Beck and H. B. Molish, editors. Free Press, Glencoe, Ill. 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, W.: Back of History: The Story of Our Own Origns. Doubleday. New York. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. (1952): A Behavior System. Wiley. New York. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J.: Cultural process and evolution. In: Behavior and Evolution. Anne Roe and G. G. Simpson, editors. Yale University Press. New Haven. 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, W.: Persecution and compensation. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 12: 464–474, 1965.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, N.: Group Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique. New York University Press. New York. 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S.: Personality Structure. In: Vol. 12. Annual Review of Psychology. Annual Reviews. Palo Alto, Calif. 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowrer, O. H.: Learning Theory and Personality Dynamics. Pp. 483–529. Ronald. New York. 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowrer, O. H.: Learning theory and the neurotic fallacy. Am. J. Orthopsychiat., 679–689, 1952.

  • Mullan, H., and Rosenbaum, M.: Group Psychotherapy: Theory and Practice. Macmillan, New York. 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. S.: The perceiver's identification of the figure in the Rorschach human movement response. J. Proj. Tech. and Pers. Assessment, 27: 214–219, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Patient variability as a factor in group activities on a maximum security ward.Psychiat. Quart., 39: 264–277, 1965-a.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —: The acceptability and expression of attitudes associated to the Rorschach human movement response. J. Proj. Tech. and Pers. Assessment, 29: 85–91, 1965-b.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The therapeutic arts: A new approach to the resolution of resistance in psychotherapy. In: Poetry Therapy. J. J. Leedy, editor. Lippincott. Philadelphia. In press. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. S., and Davidson, N. L.: A comparison of students of nursing and hospitalized patients on scores derived from an intelligence test (WAIS).Psychiat. Quart. Suppl., 37: 298–306, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. S., and Wiederlight, M.: Non-verbal behavior and the subject-examiner interaction in diagnosis. Unpublished manuscript. 1965.

  • Pittendrigh, C. S.: Adaptation, natural selection, and behavior. In: Behavior and Evolution. Anne Roc and G. G. Simpson, editors. Yale University Press. New Haven. 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rado, S.: Adaptational psychodynamics: a basic science. In: Changing Concepts of Psychoanalytic Medicine. S. Rado and J. Daniels, editors. Grune & Stratton. New York. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritvo, Lucille B.: Darwin as the source of Freud's Neo-Lamarckianism. J. Am. Psychoan. Ass'n., 13: 499–517, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, W.: Character Analysis. Orgone Institute Press. New York. 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, A. S.: Phylogeny and behavior with special reference to vertebrate evolution. In: Behavior and Evolution. Anne Roe and G. G. Simpson, editors. Yale University Press. New Haven. 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E. K., and Wolf, A.: The quest for certainty. Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 81: 69–84, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R.: Role conflict or resistance: a new look at certain phases of psychotherapy. Am. J. Psychother., 18: 25–34, 1964.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R., and Ingalls, A.: Resistance to treatment: explorations of the patient's sick role. Am. J. Psychother., 18: 562–573, 1964.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Storrow, H. A., and Spanner, M.: Does psychotherapy change patients' attitudes? J.N.M.D., 134: 440–446, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, J., and Smith, B.: Phases in group development in the treatment of drug addicts. Int. J. Group Psychother., 3, 66–78, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waelder, R.: Introduction to the discussion on problems of transference. Int. J. Psycho-An., 37: 367–368, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolberg, L.: The handling of resistance to cure. In: The Technique of Psychotherapy. Grune & Stratton. New York. 1954.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The clinical observations described herein were primarily from the author's groups at the New York Regional Office of the Veterans Administration. Helpful comments concerning the manuscript were received from Julius Barasch, M.D., chief of the Psychiatry and Neurology Service, Milton Berger, M.D., consultant in group psychotherapy, Sidney Pally, Ph.D., Melvin Wiederlight, M.D., and Ernest Oppenheimer, M.D. Mrs. Judith Wechsler, medical librarian, provided invaluable assistance. The article is based upon a paper read March 19, 1965, at the annual meeting of the American Society for Group Psychotherapy and Psychodrama, in New York City.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parker, R.S. The varieties of resistance in group psychotherapy considered from the viewpoint of adaptation. Psych Quar 41, 525–535 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01562614

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01562614

Keywords

Navigation