Abstract
The possibility that sex role orientation was a better predictor of care-oriented moral development than gender for both men and women was investigated in this study. Also, the relationship between care-oriented moral reasoning and prosocial behavior was examined. Subjects were university students with the majority being Caucasian (97%) and single (86%). Using pre-selected groups of sex role stereotyped and androgynous individuals (45 females, 45 males), the relationship between sex role orientation and care-oriented moral reasoning was found to be stronger than that between gender and moral reasoning. However, this finding was accounted for largely by differences among women. Although moral reasoning did not relate to prosocial behavior as expected, there were significant gender differences in prosocial behavior. Two implications are that the Ethic of Care Interview may need to be re-designed to be more applicable for men and that sex role subscription may be a more important psychological variable than gender.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1016–1023.
Berzins, J., Welling, M., & Wetter, R. (1977, July).The PRF- ANDRO users manual-revised. Unpublished materials, University of Kentucky.
Brabeck, M. (1983). Moral judgment: Theory and research on differences between males and females.Developmental Review, 3 274–291.
Broughton, J. M. (1983). Women's rationality and men's virtues: A critique of gender dualism in Gilligan's theory of moral development.Social Research, 50 597–642.
Brown, L. M., Argyris, D., Attanucci, J., Bardige, B., Gilligan, C., Johnston, K., Miller, B., Osborne, R., Ward, J., Wiggins, G., & Wilcox, D. (1987). A guide to reading narratives of moral conflict and choice for self and moral voice. In L. Brown (Ed.),Mapping the moral domain: A method of inquiry, Monograph No. 1. Cambridge, MA: The Center for the Study of Gender, Education, and Human Development, Harvard University.
Chodorow, N. (1974). Family structure and feminine personality. In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.),Woman, culture and society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Chodorow, N. (1978).The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Eisenberg, N. (1979a). Development of children's prosocial moral judgments.Developmental Psychology, 15 128–137.
Eisenberg, N. (1979b). The relationship of prosocial moral reasoning to altruism, political liberalism and intelligence.Developmental Psychology, 15 87–89.
Eisenberg, N. (1982). The development of reasoning regarding prosocial behavior. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.),Prosocial behavior. New York: Academic Press.
Ford, M. R., & Lowery, C. R. (1986). Gender differences in moral reasoning: A comparison of the use of justice and care orientations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 777–783.
Garwood, S. G., Levine, D. W., & Ewing, L. (1980). Effect of protagonist's sex on assessing gender differences in moral reasoning.Developmental Psychology, 16 677–678.
Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and morality.Harvard Educational Review, 47 481–517.
Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34 223–237.
Gilligan, C., Brown, L. M., & Rogers, A. (1990). Psyche embedded: A place for body, relationships, and culture in personality theory. In A. I. Rabin, R. A. Zucker, R. A. Emmons, & S. Frank (Eds.),Studying persons and lives. New York: Springer.
Gilligan. C., & Wiggins, G. (1987). The origins of morality in early childhood relationships. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.),The emergence of morality in young children. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hare-Mustin, R. T. (1987). The gender dichotomy and developmental theory: A response to Sayers.New Ideas in Psychology, 5 61–67.
Helmreich, R., Spence, J. T., & Wilhelm, J. F. (1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire,Sex Roles, 7 1097–1107.
Johnston, D. K. (1988). Adolescents' solutions to dilemmas in fables: Two moral orientations—two problem solving strategies. In C. Gilligan, J. V. Ward, J. M. Taylor & B. Bardige (Eds.),Mapping the moral domain. Cambridge, MA: The Center for the Study of Gender, Education, and Human Development, Harvard University.
Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics.Human Development Monograph Series.
Lyons, N. (1983). Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality.Harvard Educational Review, 53 125–145.
Nunner-Winkler, G. (1984). Two moralities? A critical discussion of an ethic of care and responsibility versus an ethic of rights and justice. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.),Morality, moral behavior and moral development. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Patterson, S., Söchting, I., & Marcia, J. E. (1992). Women's identity: the inner space and beyond. In G. Adams, T. Gullotta, & R. Montemayor (Eds.),Advances in adolescent development: Vol. 4. Adolescent identity formation. Sage Publications.
Pratt, M. W., & Royer, J. M. (1982). When rights and responsibilities don't mix: sex and sex-role patterns in moral judgement orientation.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 14 190–204.
Rest, J. R. (1979).Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sayers, J. (1987). Freud revisited: On gender, moral development, and androgyny.New Ideas in Psychology, 5 197–206.
Schiedel, D. G., & Marcia, J. E. (1985). Ego identity, intimacy, sex role orientation, and gender.Developmental Psychology, 18 149–160.
Skoe, E. E. (1987). The development and partial validation of a care-based measure of moral development. (Doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia).Dissertation Abstracts International, 50 04-B, p. 1657.
Skoe, E. E. (in press). Sex role orientation and its relationship to the development of identity and moral thought.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology.
Skoe, E. E., & Pedersen, A. (1994).Ethic of care and prosocial activities in Norwegian men and women. Unpublished manuscript, University of Tromsö, Tromsö, Norway.
Skoe, E. E., & R. Diessner (1994). Ethic of care, justice, identity and gender—an extension and replication.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40 102–119.
Skoe, E. E., & Gooden, A. (1993). Ethic of care and real-life moral dilemma content in male and female early adolescents.Journal of Early Adolescence, 13 154–167.
Skoe, E. E., & Marcia, J. E. (1991). A measure of care-based morality and its relation to ego identity.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37 289–304.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationship with sex-role attitudes and behaviors.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5 147–163.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity.JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4 42 (No. 617).
Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review.Child Development, 55 677–691.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based largely on I. Söchting's master's thesis. The authors thank research assistants Monica Grünberg, Elly Tamarin, Sharon Peachy, Karen Tee, and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Söchting, I., Skoe, E.E. & Marcia, J.E. Care-oriented moral reasoning and prosocial behavior: A question of gender or sex role orientation. Sex Roles 31, 131–147 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547711
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547711