Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of female power in marriage on sexual behaviors and attitudes: A holocultural study

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abernethy (1974) hypothesized that the quality and quantity of sexual activity within marriage is affected by the dominance relations between partners. This paper reviews her argument and the reactions it engendered. A holocultural test of the relationship between a wife's power within marriage and various measures of sexual behaviors and attitudes is conducted to explore one aspect of Abernethy's position. The results suggest that high levels of female power within marriage do not have an adverse affect on male sexual functioning. Results also indicate that societies characterized by high female power within marriage exhibit behaviors and attitudes which Western thought sees as sexually “healthy.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernethy, V. (1974). Dominance and sexual behavior: A hypothesis.Amer. J. Psychiat. 131: 813–817.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, C. (1963). Affiliations: Structural determinants of differential divorce rates.Amer. J. Sociol. 69: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, I., Bain, H. J., Dince, P. R., Drellich, M. G., Grand, H. G., Gundlach, R. H., Kremer, M. W., Rifkin, A. H., Wilber, C. B., and Bieber, T. B. (1962).Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broude, G. J. (1975). A cross-cultural study of some sexual beliefs and practices. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Broude, G. J., and Greene, S. (1976). Cross-cultural codes on twenty sexual attitudes and practices.Ethnology 15: 409–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R. C. (1975). Critique of a hypothesis of dominance and sexual behavior.Amer. J. Psychiat. 132: 967–969.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. F., Modhal, K. B., and Eaton, G. G. (1982). Dominance status of adult male Japanese macaques: Relationship to female dominance status, male mating behavior, seasonal changes, and developmental changes,Anim. Behav. 30: 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. R., Ellis, G. J., Peterson, L., Kezis, M., and Stone, L. (1981). Unpublished codes.

  • Malinowski, B. (1927).Sex and Repression in Savage Society. Brace and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minturn, L., Grosse, M., and Haider, S. (1969). Cultural patterning of sexual beliefs and behavior.Ethnology 8: 301–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P., and White, D. (1969). The standard cross-cultural sample.Ethnology 8: 329–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sade, D. S. (1968). Inhibition of son-mother mating among free ranging rhesus monkeys. In Masserman, J. H. (ed.),Science and Psychoanalysis, Vol. 12: Animal and Human Grune & Stratton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegelman, M. (1974). Parental background of male homosexuals and heterosexuals.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 3–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, R. J. (1971). Transsexualism and transvestism.Psychiat. Ann. 1: 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, R. J. (1973). New advances in sex research.Amer. J. Psychiat. 130: 241–251.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, D. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on theory and research on male homosexuality.J. Homosex. 4: 345–362.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Part of this research was conducted while the author was supported by a National Endowment for the Humanities Residential Fellowship (1981–1982).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gray, J.P. The influence of female power in marriage on sexual behaviors and attitudes: A holocultural study. Arch Sex Behav 13, 223–231 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541649

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541649

Key words

Navigation