Skip to main content
Log in

Maximizing the therapeutic effectiveness of small psychotherapy groups

  • Published:
Group

Abstract

Little attention has been paid in the literature to the ways in which psychotherapy groups of fewer than five members can be led effectively. The conditions leading to small groups are presented, including both dynamic and circumstantial conditions arising in the institution, the group, and the therapist. The dynamics of small groups are described based on social psychology research and clinical observations. The paper concludes by presenting therapist and member characteristics as well as therapeutic techniques which contribute to the maximal effectiveness of groups with fewer than five members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asch, S. E. (1962). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.),Group dynamics: Research and theory. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1961).Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, M. (1981). Process in classical psychodynamic groups.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 31(2), 153–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P. H. (1953). An analysis of the primary group.Sociometry, 16, 272–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. D. (1973).Persuasion and healing: A comparative study of psychotherapy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson, C. C., Hawkins, D. M., & Alden, A. R. (1981). Psychotherapy groups of insufficient size.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 31(1), 73–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, A. P. (1952).Handbook of small group research. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 224–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E. Jr. (1951). The effect of group size on decision-making discussions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Rice, C. A. & Rutan, J. S. (1981). Boundary maintenance in inpatient therapy groups.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 31(3), 297–309.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutan, J. S. & Alonso, A. (1978). Some guidelines for group therapists.Group, 2, 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutan, J. S. & Rice, C. A. (1981). The charismatic leader: Asset or liability?Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 18(24), 487–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutan, J. S. & Stone, W. N. (1984).Psychodynamic group psychotherapy. Lexington, MA: Collamore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, A. S. (1964). Use of group balance as a therapeutic technique.Archives of General Psychiatry, 11, 411–420.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. E. (1958). Contrasting correlates of group size.Sociometry, 21, 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. (1975).The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books, pp. 284–286.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, S.L., Rice, C.A. Maximizing the therapeutic effectiveness of small psychotherapy groups. Group 9, 3–9 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01458260

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01458260

Keywords

Navigation