Skip to main content
Log in

Decision-making processes in community transport organisations: a comparative case study of service providers

  • Articles
  • Published:
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transport services provided by voluntary organisations have grown dramatically in recent years. However, little systematic research has been undertaken on the functioning of these organisations. The aim of the research on which this paper is based was to rectify the lack of information on how decisions relating to service provision are made by such organisations — often called ‘community transport’ (CT) operators. Three organisations were selected for a comparative case study approach. The results show that the leadership approach of their key staff was of particular significance. Each organisation is moving in the direction of greater professionalism and away from its community roots. This cultural change can be attributed to responses to external forces, especially those affecting resources. Evidence suggests they are being forced towards adopting practices of the private sector, but that this need not be the case. Community transport provision is in a period of transition, the outcome of which may radically alter both its structure and its survival capacities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H. (1976) Resource dependence and interorganisational relations: local employment service officers and social services sector organisations,Administration and Society, 7:4, 419–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. and Knapp, M. (1990) Voluntas: an editorial statement,Voluntas, 1:1, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1976)The Unconscious Conspiracy: Why Leaders Can't Lead, AMACOM, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. and Nanus, B. (1985)Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. (1975) The interorganizational network as a political economy,Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 229–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1984) Leadership and corporate culture: harmony and disharmony,Personnel Review, 13, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1989) Leadership and culture in organizations,Public Money and Management, 9, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1992)Charisma and Leadership in Organizations, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A., Gillingwater, D. and McGuinness, I. (1990) Decision-making processes in voluntary sector transport provision, TT9005, Loughborough University.

  • Chandler, A. (1962)Strategy and Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W.W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,American Sociological Review, 48:2, 147–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967)Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, AVC, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall R., Clark, J., Giordano, P., Johnson, P. and van Roekel, M. (1977) Patterns of inter-organizational relationships,Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 457–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. and Meyerson, D. (1988) Organizational cultures and the denial, channeling and acknowledgment of ambiguity, in L. Pondy, R. Boland and H. Thomas (eds)Managing Ambiguity and Change, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. and McHugh, A. (1985) Strategy formation in an adhocracy,Administrative Science Quarterly, 30:2, 160–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, M. (1989)The Third America: The Emergence of the Non-Profit Sector in the United States, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. and Waterman, R. (1982)In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978)The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N. and Bradley, R. (1988) Limits of charisma, in J. Conger and R. Kanungo (eds)Charismatic Leadership: The Elusive Factor in Organizational Effectiveness, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1986) Do government grants to charity reduce private donations?, in S. Rose-Ackerman (ed.)The Economics of Non-profit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. (1974)Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts.

  • Seibel, W. (1990) Government/third sector relationship in a comparative perspective: the cases of France and West Germany,Voluntas, 1:1, 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (1987)Transport Provision and Social Policies, Avebury, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transport Canada (1986)Fourth International Conference on Mobility and Transport for Elderly and Disabled Persons, TP 8320, Transport Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, A., Gillingwater, D. and Bryman, A. (1988) Community-based transport coordination strategies: the UK experience,International Journal of Specialized Transportation Planning and Practice, 3:1, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. (1988)The Nonprofit Economy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. and Butler, R. (1986) Voluntary organizations in action: strategy in the voluntary sector,Journal of Management Studies, 23:5, 519–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1988)Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed., Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research on which this paper is based was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council. The authors would also like to place on record their thanks to the three organisations who participated in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bryman, A., Gillingwater, D. & McGuinness, I. Decision-making processes in community transport organisations: a comparative case study of service providers. Voluntas 3, 71–87 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01398027

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01398027

Keywords

Navigation