Abstract
A policy capturing analysis of 206 federal district and appellate sexual harassment cases showed that federal judges were moderately consistent in their judgments, with 29% of the variance in case outcomes accounted for by the regression model. Judges used Victim's Reaction, Form of Harassment, and Coercion, to make their ruling, and these three cues accounted for 20% of the variance in judgments. Appellate judges were slightly less consistent than district judges, and there were differences in judgment policy between appellate and district level cases. These findings are consistent with key aspects of the EEOC's Guidelines on Sexual Harassment and suggest that federal judges use the Guidelines to make their judgments. The model could be used by potential plaintiffs or defendants in sexual harassment cases to generate a prediction of the likely outcome of their case, to decide whether to pursue the case in court or seek a settlement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Backhouse, C., & Cohen, L. (1978).The Secret Oppression: Sexual Harassment of Working Women. Toronto: Macmillan of Canada.
Baldridge, K., & McLean, G. (1980). Sexual harassment: How much of a problem is it ... really?Journal of Business Education, 55, 294–297.
Benson, D. J., & Thomson, G. E. (1982). Sexual harassment on a university campus: The confluence of authority relations, sexual interest, and gender stratification.Social Problems, 24, 236–251.
Bowman, E. H. (1982). Risk taking by troubled firms,Sloan Management Reviews, Summer, 33–42.
Budd, R. W., Thorp, R. K., & Donohew, L. (1967).Content Analysis of Communications. New York: MacMillan.
Bureau of National Affairs (1981).Sexual Harassment and Labor Relations: A Bureau of National Affairs special report. Washington, DC: BNA.
Carlson, R. (1984). What's social about social psychology? Where's the person in personality research?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1304–1309.
Clode, D. (1988).Sexual Harassment in the Federal Govermment: An Update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Cohen, A. G., & Gutek, B. A. (1985). Dimensions of perceptions of social-sexual behavior in a work setting.Sex Roles, 13(5–6), 317–327.
Collins, E. G., & Blodgett, T. B. (1981). Sexual harassment: Some see it ... some won't.Harvard Business Review, 59, 76–95.
Doherty, M. E. (1980). Assessing the fairness of social policies. In Hammond, K. R., & Wascoe, N. (Eds.),Realizations of Brunswik's Representative Design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1980). Discrimination because of sex under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended: Adoption of interim interpretive guidelines.Federal Register, 45, 25024–25025.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., Ormerod, M., & Weitzman, L. (1988a). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152–175.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Weitzman, L. M., Gold, Y., & Ormerod, M. (1988b). Academic harassment: Sex and denial in scholarly garb.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 329–340.
Gillis, R. E. (1980). Understanding the effects of psychiatric drugs on social judgment. In Hammond, K. R., & Wascoe, N. (Eds.)Realizations of Brunswik's Representative Design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gross, B. L., & Sheth, J. N. (1989). Time-oriented advertising: A content analysis of United States magazine advertising, 1890–1988.Journal of Marketing, 53 (October), 76–83.
Gutek, B. A., Morash, B., & Cohen, A. G. (1983). Interpreting social-sexual behavior in the work setting.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 30–48.
Gutek, B. A., Nakamura, C. Y., Gahart, M., Handschumacher, I., & Russell, D. (1980). Sexuality and the workplace.Basic and Applied Psychology, 1, 255–265.
Hammond, K. R. (1973). The cognitive conflict paradigm. In Rappaport, L., & Summers, D. A. (Eds.)Human Judgment and Social Interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Helenius, M. (1973). Socially induced cognitive conflict: A study of disagreement over childrearing practices. In Rappaport, L. & Summers, D. A. (Eds.),Human Judgment and Social Interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Holsti, O. R. (1969).Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesly Publishing.
Hubbart, W. S. (1980). Sexual harassment: Coping with the controversy.Administrative Management, 41, 34–35, 74–76.
Lafontaine, E., & Tredeau, L. (1986). The frequency, sources, and correlates of sexual harassment among women in traditional male occupations.Sex Roles, 15(7?8), 433–442.
Lester, D., Banta, B., Barton, J., Elian, N., Mackiewicz, L., & Winkelreid, J. (1986).Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 990.
Lott, B., Reilly, M. F., & Howard, D. R. (1982). Sexual assault and harassnent: A campus community case study.Signs, 8, 320–336.
Maniscalco, C. I., Doherty, M. E., & Ullman, D. G. (1980). Assessing discrimination: An application of social judgment technology.Hournal of Applied Psychology, 65, 284–288.
McCormack, A. (1985). The sexual harassment of students by teachers: The case of students in science.Sex Roles, 13(1/2), 21–32.
Merit Systems Protection Board (1981).Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Is It a Problem? Washington DC: U.S.: Government Printing Office.
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 40 Fair Employment Practices Cases 1822 (Supreme Court, 1986).
North, R. C., Holsti, O., Zaninovich, M. G., & Zines, D. A. (1963).Content Analysis: A Handbook with Applications for the Study of International Crisis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Phelps, R. H., & Shanteau, J. (1978). Livestock judges: How much information can an expert use?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 209–219.
Pollack, D. M. (1988). Gender differences in perception of social-sexual situations as sexual harassment in the workplace. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University.
Powell, G. N. (1983). Definition of sexual harassment and sexual attention experienced.Journal of Psychology, 113, 113–117.
Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., & Gallogly, S. M. (1986). Sexual harassement of university students.Sex Roles, 15(7/8), 333–358.
Rice, M. D., & Lu, Z. (1988). A content analysis of Chinese magazine advertisements.Journal of Advertising, 17(4), 43–48.
Roose, J. E., & Doherty, M. E. (1978). A social theoretic approach to sex discrimination in faculty salaries.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 193–215.
Slovic, P. (1969). Analyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of a stocbroker's decision process.Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 255–263.
Slovic, P., Fleissner, D., & Bauman, W. S. (1972). Analyzing the use of information in investment decision making: A methodological proposal.Journal of Business, 45, 283–301.
Steinman, D. O. (1974). Transfer of lens model training.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 1–16.
Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1987). A hierarchy of sexual harassment.Journal of Psychology, 121(6), 599–605.
Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1988). Outcomes of sexual harassment charges.Academy of Management Journal, 31, 185–194.
Thomann, D. A., Weiner, R. L. (1987). Physical and psychological causality as determinants of culpability in sexual harassment cases.Sex Roles, 17(9/10), 573–591.
Tse, D. K., Belk, R. W., & Zhou, N. (1989). Becoming a consumer society: A longitudinal and cross-cultural content analysis of print ads from Hong Kong, the People's Republic of China, and Taiwan.Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 457–472.
Ullman, D. G., & Doherty, M. E. (1984). Two determinants of the diagnosis of hyperactivity: The child and the clinician.Advances in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 5, 167–219.
Ullman, D. G., Egan, D., Fiedler, N. Jurenec, G., Pliske, R., Thompson, P., & Doherty, M. (1981). The many faces of hyperactivity: Similarities and differences in diagnostic policies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 694–704.
Vinson v. Taylor, 36 Fair Employment Practices Cases 1423 (U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia, 1985).
Waks, J. W., & Starr, M. G. (1982). The sexual shakedown in perspective: Sexual harassment in its social and legal contexts.Employee Relations Law Journal, 7, 567–586.
Weber, R. P. (1985).Basic Content Analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-001. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.
Williams v. Saxbe, 12 Fair Employment Practices Cases 1093 (DC District 1976); 13 Fair Employment Practices Cases 969 (DC District 1976); 413 F.Supp 654 (DC District 1976).
York, K. M. (1989). Defining sexual harassment in workplace: A policy-capturing approach.Academic of Management Journal, 32, 830–850.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
York, K.M. A policy capturing analysis of federal district and appellate court sexual harassment cases. Employ Respons Rights J 5, 173–184 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384735
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384735