Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical sensitivity of the facial nerve fibers innervating the anterior palate of the puffer,Fugu pardalis, and their central projection to the primary taste center

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Mechanical and chemical sensitivity of the palatine nerve, ramus palatinus facialis, innervating the anterior palate of the puffer,Fugu pardalis, and their central projection to the primary taste center were investigated.

  2. 2.

    Application of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) to the central cut end of the palatine nerve resulted in retrogradely labeled neurons in the geniculate ganglion but no such neurons in the trigeminal ganglion, suggesting that the palatine nerve is represented only by the facial component.

  3. 3.

    Tracing of the facial sensory root in serial histological sections of the brain stem suggested that the facial sensory nerve fibers project only to the visceral sensory column of the medulla.

  4. 4.

    Peripheral recordings from the palatine nerve bundle showed that both mechanical and chemical stimuli caused marked responses. Mechanosensitive fibers were rather uniformly distributed in the nerve bundle.

  5. 5.

    Intra-cranial recordings from the trigeminal and facial nerves at their respective roots revealed that tactile information produced in the anterior palate was carried by the facial nerve fibers.

  6. 6.

    Elimination of the sea water current over the receptive field also caused a marked response in the palatine nerve bundle or facial nerve root while this did not cause any detectable responses in the trigeminal nerve root.

  7. 7.

    Single fiber analyses of the mechanical responsiveness of the palatine nerve were performed by recording unit responses of 106 single fibers to mechanical stimuli (water flow), HCl (0.005M), uridine-5′-monophosphate (UMP, 0.001M), proline (0.01M), CaCl2 (0.5M), and NaSCN (0.5M). All these fibers responded well to one of the above stimuli; however, most taste fibers did not respond well to the inorganic salts. The palatine fibers (n=36), identified as mechanosensitive, never responded to any of the chemical stimuli, whereas chemosensitive fibers (n=70) did not respond to mechanical stimuli at all. The chemosensitive units showed a high specificity to the above stimuli: they tended to respond selectively to hydrochloric acid, UMP, or proline.

  8. 8.

    The responses of the mechanosensitive units consisted of phasic and tonic impulse trains and the sensitivity of the units varied considerably.

  9. 9.

    The results reveal that the facial nerve fibers innervating the anterior palate of the puffer contain two kinds of afferent fibers, chemosensory and mechanosensory respectively, and suggest that the convergence of the tactile and gustatory information first occurs in the neurons of the primary gustatory center in the medulla.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atema J (1971) Structures and functions of the sense of taste in the catfish (Ictalurus natalis). Brain Behav Evol 4:273–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Atoda K (1936) The innervation of the cranial nerves of the catfish:Parasilurus asotus L. Sci Rep Tohoku Imp Univ (Biol) 11:91–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardach JE, Atema J (1971) The sense of taste in fishes. In: Beidler LM (ed) Chemical senses. (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol. IV/2) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 293–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Biedenbach MA (1971) Functional properties of barbel mechanoreceptors in catfish. Brain Res 27:360–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Biedenbach MA (1973) Functional properties and projection areas of cutaneous receptors in catfish. J Comp Physiol 84:227–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Biedenbach MA, Chan KY (1971) Tongue mechanoreceptors: comparison of afferent fibers in the lingual nerve and chorda tympani. Brain Res 35:584–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau JC, Bradley BE, Bierer PR, Kruger S, Tsuchitani C (1971) Single unit recordings from the geniculate ganglion of the facial nerve of the cat. Exp Brain Res 13:461–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley RM, Stedman HM, Mistretta C (1983) Superior laryngeal nerve responses to chemical stimulation of sheep epiglottis. Brain Res 276:81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess PR, Perl ER (1973) Cutaneous mechanoreceptors and nociceptors. In: Iggo A (ed) Somatosensory System, (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol. 2) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 29–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras RJ, Beckstead RM, Norgren (1982) The central projections of the trigeminal, facial, glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves: An autoradiographic study in the rat. J Auton Nerv System 6:303–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport DJ, Caprio J (1982) Taste and tactile recordings from the ramus recurrens facialis innervating flank taste buds in the catfish. J Comp Physiol 147:217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Düring M von, Andres KH (1976) The ultrastructure of taste and touch receptors of the frog's taste organ. Cell Tissue Res 165:185–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger TE (1976) Gustatory pathways in the bullhead catfish I. Connections of the anterior ganglion. J Comp Neurol 165:513–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger TE (1978) Gustatory pathways in the bullhead catfish II. Facial lobe connections. J Comp Neurol 180:691–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiya M, Bardach JE (1966) A comparison between the external taste sense of marine and freshwater fishes. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 32:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton RB, Norgren R (1984) Central projections of gustatory nerves in the rat. J Comp Neurol 222:560–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick CJ (1899) The cranial and first spinal nerves ofMenidia; a contribution upon the nerve components of the bony fishes. J Comp Neurol 9:153–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick CJ (1900) A contribution upon the cranial nerves of the cod fish. J Comp Neurol 10:265–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick CJ (1901) The cranial nerves and cutaneous sense organs of the North American siluroid fishes. J Comp Neurol 11:177–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick CJ (1906) On the centers for taste and touch in the medulla oblongata of fishes. J Comp Neurol 16:403–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidaka I, Kiyohara S (1975) Taste responses to ribonucleotides and amino acids in fish. In: Denton DA, Coghlan JP (eds) Olfaction and taste V. Academic Press, New York London, pp 147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland F (1933) Specific nerve impulses from gustatory and tactile receptors in catfish. J Gen Physiol 16:685–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanwal JS, Caprio J (1983) An electrophysiological investigation of the oro-pharyngeal (IX–X) taste system in the channel catfish,Ictalurus punctatus. J Comp Physiol 150:345–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyohara S, Hidaka I, Tamura T (1975a) Gustatory response in the puffer. II. Single fiber analyses. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 41:383–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyohara S, Hidaka I, Tamura T (1975b) The anterior cranial gustatory pathway in fish. Experientia 31:1051–1053

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyohara S, Shiratani T, Yamashita S (1985) Peripheral and central distribution of major branches of the facial taste nerve in the carp. Brain Res 325:57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyohara S, Yamashita S, Kitoh J (1980) Distribution of taste buds on the lips and inside the mouth in the minnow,Pseudorasbora parva. Physiol Behav 24:1143–1147

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi J, Zotterman Y (1961) Taste functions in the carp. An electrophysiological study on gustatory fibres. Acta Physiol Scand 52:150–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane EB, Whitear M (1977) On the occurrence of Merkel cells in the epidermis of teleost fishes. Cell Tissue Res 182:235–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Luiten PGM (1975) The central projections of the trigeminal, facial and anterior lateral line nerves in the carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). J Comp Neurol 160:399–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Marui T (1977) Taste responses in the facial lobe of the carp,Cyprinus carpio L. Brain Res 130:287–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Marui T, Caprio J (1982) Electrophysiological evidence for the topographical arrangement of taste and tactile neurons in the facial lobe of the channel catfish. Brain Res 231:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Marui T, Funakoshi M (1979) Tactile input to the facial lobe of the carp,Cyprinus carpio L. Brain Res 177:479–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews G, Wickelgren WO (1978) Trigeminal sensory neurons of the sea lamprey. J Comp Physiol 123:329–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita Y, Ito H, Masai H (1980) Central gustatory paths in the crucian carp,Carassius carassius. J Comp Neurol 191:119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita Y, Murakami T, Ito H (1983) Cytoarchitecture and topographic projections of the gustatory centers in a teleost,Carassius carassius. J Comp Neurol 218:378–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaki J, Yamashita S, Sato M (1964) Neural response of cat to taste stimuli of varying temperatures. Jpn J Physiol 14:67–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka N (1962) Histologisch-entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Mauthnerschen Zellen von Fischen. Z Zellforsch 58:33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RH (1972) Tactile responses of the goldfish (Carassius auratus L.). Copeia 4:816–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Reutter K (1978) Taste organ in the bullhead (Teleostei). Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 55:1–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Samanen DW, Bernard RA (1981) Response properties of the glossopharyngeal taste system of the mud puppy (Necturus maculosus) II. Responses of individual first-order neurons. J Comp Physiol 143:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver WL, Finger TE (1984) Electrophysiological examination of a non-olfactory, non-gustatory chemosense in the searobin,Prionotus carolinus. J Comp Physiol A 154:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachibana T, Ishizeki K, Sakakura Y, Nawa T (1984) Ultrastructural evidence for a possible secretory function of Merkel cells in the barbels of a teleost fish,Cyprinus carpio. Cell Tissue Res 235:695–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Torvik A (1956) Afferent connections to the sensory trigeminal nuclei, the nucleus of the solitary tract and adjacent structures. An experimental study in the rat. J Comp Neurol 106:51–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyoshima K, Shimamura A (1982) Comparative study of ultrastructures of the lateral-line organ and the palatal taste organs in the African clawed toad,Xenopus laevis. Anat Rec 204:371–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker D (1983) Fish chemoreception: peripheral anatomy and physiology. In: Northcutt PG, Davis RE (eds) Fish neurobiology, vol 1: Brain stem and sense organs. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 311–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead MC, Frank ME (1983) Anatomy of the gustatory system in the hamster: central projections of the chorda tympani and the lingual nerve. J Comp Neurol 220:378–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamane S (1978) Influence of ions and chemical substances on the response of the frog's tongue to mechanical stimulation. Comp Biochem Physiol 61A:451–459

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiyohara, S., Hidaka, I., Kitoh, J. et al. Mechanical sensitivity of the facial nerve fibers innervating the anterior palate of the puffer,Fugu pardalis, and their central projection to the primary taste center. J. Comp. Physiol. 157, 705–716 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350069

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350069

Keywords

Navigation