Skip to main content
Log in

The social sources of homicide in different types of societies

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

A consistent finding to emerge from cross-national studies of crime is a positive relationship between the degree of social inequality and levels of homicide. This finding contrasts with the results of anthropological case studies that reveal high rates of homicide in some extremely egalitarian societies. Viewed together, these two sets of findings raise the question of whether the patterns observed in cross-national research on homicide are generalizable to the typically small, nonindustrial “simple societies” studied by anthropologists, but generally neglected by comparative sociologists. We address this issue in an analysis of homicide for a sample of small, nonindustrial societies. Our findings indicate that the degree of inequality in such societies is not significantly associated with the level of homicide. By contrast, levels of homicide do vary systematically with the complexity of the political and military organization of such societies. These results suggest that some of the most important findings of cross-national research in sociology are not readily generalizable across different types of societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avison, William R. andPumela L. Loring 1986 “Population diversity and cross-national homicide.” Criminology 24:733–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, William C. 1984 “Poverty, inequality and city homicide rates: Some not so unexpected findings.” Criminology 22:531–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, Ilubert M. 1979 Social Statistics, rev. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Judith R. andPeter M. Blau 1982 “The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime.” American Sociological Review 47:114–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan, Paul 1960 African Homicide and Suicide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohrnstedt, George W. andDavid Knoke 1982 Statistics for Social Data Analysis. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John 1979 Inequality Crime, and Public Policy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John andValerie Braithwaite 1980 “The effect of income inequality and social democracy on homicide.” British Journal of Criminology 20:45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, Robert J., Jr. 1988 “Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects.” Criminology 26:519–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis A. 1967 Continuities in the Study of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, Robert D., Michael R. Geerken, andWalter R. Gove 1982 “Crime rate and social integration: The impact of metropolitan mobility.” Criminology 20:467–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Martin andMargo Wilson 1988 Homicide. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile 1964 The Division of Labor in Society. (1893) New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala, Robert andGary LaFree 1988 “Cross-national determinants of child homicide.” American Sociological Review 53:432–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, Reid andSteven F. Messner 1987 “Dimensions of racial inequality and rates of violent crime.” Criminology 25:525–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 “Development and decay: Their impact on public order in Western history.” In J. Inciardi and C. E. Farpel (eds.), History and Crime: Implications for Criminal Justice Policy: 31–52. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 “Historical trends in violent crimes: A critical review of the evidence.” In M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, vol. 3: 295–353. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, Henry B. andJohn M. Quigley 1982 “Population heterogeneity and the sociogenesis of homicide.” Social Forces 61:206–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. Anthony 1985 “The evolution of crime in industrial and preindustrial societies.” Comparative Social Research 3:3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justinger, Judith M. 1978 “Reaction to change: A holocultural test of some theories of religious movements.” Dissertation. Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Buffalo. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, No. 7817047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kick, Edward L. andGary D. LaFree 1985 “Development and the social context of murder and theft.” Comparative Social Research 8:37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987a “Reconsidering violence in simple human societies: Homicide among the Gebusi of New Guinea.” Current Anthropology 28:457–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987b “Reply.” Current Anthropology 28:489–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahn, Harvey, Timothy F. Hartnagel, andJohn W. Gartrell 1986 “Income inequality and homicide rates: Cross-national data and criminological theories.” Criminology 24:269–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, Marvin D. 1976 “Inequality, unemployment and crime: A cross-national analysis.” Sociological Quarterly 17:303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, Marvin D. andCharles Wellford 1977 “A static and dynamic analysis of crime and the primary dimensions of nations.” International Journal of Criminology and Penology 5:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 “Population density in cross-cultural perspective.” American Ethnologist 6:742–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 Family Violence in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, David andRichard A. Wagner, eds. 1986 HRAF Research Series in Quantitative Cross-Cultural Data: Volume I, General Cultural and Religious Data. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftin, Colin K. 1971 “Warfare and societal complexity: A cross-cultural study of organized fighting in preindustrial societies.” Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, No. 71–30, 575.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Lynn 1976 The Sociology of Law and Order. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1968 Social Theory and Social Structure, rev. 2nd ed. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 “Income inequality and murder rates: Some cross-national findings.” Comparative Social Research 3:185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982a “Poverty, inequality, and the urban homicide rate: Some unexpected findings.” Criminology 20:103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982b “Societal development, social equality, and homicide: A cross-national test of a Durkheimian model.” Social Forces 61:225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 “Economic discrimination and societal homicide rates: Further evidence on the cost of inequality.” American Sociological Review 54:597–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, George P. 1967 Ethnographic Atlas. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1962 Data Quality Control. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1969 “Cultural determinants and the concept of sick society.” In R. B. Edgerton and S. C. Plog (eds.), Changing Perspectives in Mental Illness: 128–155. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettler, Gwynn 1984 Explaining Crime. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otterbein, Keith F. 1987 “Comment on Knauft.” Current Anthropology 28:484–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott 1970 “Equality and inequality in modern society, or social stratification revisited.” In E. O. Laumann (ed.), Social Stratification: Research and Theory for the 1970s: 13–72. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, Richard 1986 “Urban crime rates: Effects of inequality, welfare dependency, region and race.” In J. M. Byrne and R. J. Sampson (eds.), The Social Ecology of Crime: 116–130. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Mare Howard 1987 “Comment on Knauft.” Current Anthropology 28:485–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985 “Race and criminal violence: A demographically disaggregated analysis of urban homicide.” Crime and Delinquency 31:47–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 “Urban black violence: The effect of male joblessness and family dissolution.” American Journal of Sociology 93:348–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Louise I. 1981 Crime and Modernization: The Impact of Industrialization and Urbanization on Crime. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Rodney 1989 Introducing Criminology Through the Computer. Seattle, WA: Cognitive Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vold, George B. andThomas J. Bernard 1986 Theoretical Criminology, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, Howard 1976 Crime and the Development of Modern Society: Patterns of Criminality in Nineteenth Century Germany and France. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenfeld, R., Messner, S.F. The social sources of homicide in different types of societies. Sociol Forum 6, 51–70 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112727

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112727

Key words

Navigation