Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a stakeholder-based policy process: An application of the social marketing perspective to environmental policy development

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article suggests that the application of social marketing principles to the public policy process can facilitate the efforts of governmental policy-makers and non-governmental stakeholders to articulate their policy desires and to encourage the adoption and acceptance of particular environmental policies. A conceptual framework is presented, emphasizing both the influence of stakeholders on environmental policy development and the education of stakeholders as to the potential effects of the policy. The purpose of such a conceptualization is to show how social marketing principles can be applied to the public policy process in order to enhance the likelihood of successful policy development and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, James E. (1979).Public Policy Making. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James E., Brady, David W., and Charles Bullock (1978).Public Policy and Politics in America. North Scituate, MA Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, Johan (1978). ‘How broad should the marketing concept be?”Journal of Marketing 42: 101–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assael, Henry (1991).Marketing: Principles and Strategy. Chicago: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacot, A. Hunter, Fitzgerald, Michael R., and Amy Snyder McCabe (1991). ‘Articulating policy to the public: Challenges for communicating environmental decisions,” a paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration, Charlotte, N.C., October 16–18.

  • Dye, Thomas R. (1981).Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enis, Ben M. (1973). ‘Deepening the concept of marketing,’Journal of Marketing 37: 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, E. Scott (1989). ‘Applied behavior analysis and social marketing: An integration for environmental preservation,’Journal of Social Issues 45: 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, Daniel H. and William R. Mangun (1989).Managing the Environmental Crisis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, R. Bruce and Olli T. Ahtola (1991). “Consumer response to a five-year campaign to combat air pollution,’Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 10: 242–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, Patricia W. (1987). ‘Toward more systematic consideration of policy design,”Policy Studies Journal 15: 611–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Charles O. (1977).An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Boston: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John W. (1984).Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Phillip and Sidney J. Levy (1969). ‘Broadening the concept of marketing,’Journal of Marketing 33: 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Phillip (1976).Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, and Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Phillip (1975).Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles (1980).The Policy Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, David J. (1969). ‘Broadening the concept of marketing — too far,’Journal of Marketing 33: 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opinion Research Corporation (1990). ‘Environmental concerns are resulting in changes in consumer behavior,’ press release, June 28.

  • Peters, B. Guy (1993).American Public Policy: Promise and Performance. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petkus, Ed,Jr. and Robert B. Woodruff (1992). ‘A model of the socially-responsible decision-making process in marketing: Linking decision-makers and stakeholders,”American Marketing Association Educators' Proceedings.

  • Portney, Kent E. (1986).Approaching Public Policy Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pride, William M and O.C. Ferrell (1991).Marketing: Concepts and Strategies. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, Walter A. (1973).The Politics of Environmental Concern. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Richard A. (1984). ‘Advocacy, interpretation, and influence in the U.S. Congress,’American Political Science Review 78: 44–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starling, Grover (1988).Strategies for Policy Making. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Christopher D. (1974).Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Los Altos, CA: Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Altman, J.A., Petkus, E. Toward a stakeholder-based policy process: An application of the social marketing perspective to environmental policy development. Policy Sci 27, 37–51 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999598

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999598

Keywords

Navigation