Abstract
Previous research on spouse abuse has frequently focused on bivariate relationships between theoretically derived variables and marital violence. This study utilizes a multivariate approach in order to explore the independent and combined effects of several variables derived from the social learning and the frustration/strain perspectives on self-reported violence by husbands against wives. Data for married and/or cohabiting males are derived from a national stratified random sample of couples in the United States. Loglinear analysis is used to identify the main and interactive effects of age, occupational status, employment status, subjective economic strain, and observation of parental violence on reports of violence toward one's wife. Results indicate that age, occupational status, parental modeling and employment status affect the likelihood of violence. Employment status more strongly increases the likelihood of violence for younger men, as opposed to older men, which supports the strain perspective. The independent effect of the observation of parental violence lends support to the social learning approach. Social policy implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. (1979).Violence against Wives, The Free Press, New York.
Fagan, J. A., Stewarst, D., and Hansen, K. V. (1983). Violent men or violent husbands? Background factors and situational correlates. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 49–67.
Farrington, K. M. (1980). Stress and family violence. In Strauss, M. A., and Hotaling, G. T. (eds.),The Social Causes of Husband-Wife Violence, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 94–114.
Gelles, R. J. (1980). Violence in the family: A review of research in the seventies.J. Marr. Fam. 873–885.
Gentemann, K. M. (1984). Wife-beating: Attitudes of a non-clinical population.Victimology, 9: 109–119.
Goodman, L. A. (1972). A modified multiple regression approach to the analysis of dichotomous variables.Am. Sociological Rev. 37: 28–46.
Holt, D. (1979). Log-linear models for contingency table analysis: On the interpretation of the parameters.Sociological Methods Res. 7: 330–336.
Jansen, R. (1978). Battered women and the law.Victimology 34: 585–590.
Long, J. (1984). Estimable functions in log-linear models.Sociological Methods Res. 12: 399–432.
Prescott, S., and Letko, C. (1977). Battered women: A social psychological perspective. In Roy, M. (ed.),Battered Women: A Psychosociological Study of Domestic Violence, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 72–96.
Stark, R., and J. McEvoy, J. II (1970). Middle class violence.Psychology Today, 3: 52–65.
Steinmetz, S. K. (1977). Wifebeating, husbandbeating —A comparison of the use of physical violence between spouses to resolve marital fights. In M. Roy (ed.),Battered Women: A Psychosociological Study of Domestic Violence, Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 63–72.
Straus, M. A. (1973). A general systems theory approach to a theory of violence between family members.Social Sci. Inf., 12: 105–125.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.
Sutherland, E. H., and Cressey, D. R. (1974).Criminology, (ninth edition), Lippincott, Philadelphia, Pa.
Walker, L. E. (1983). The battered woman syndrome study. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 31–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howell, M.J., Pugliesi, K.L. Husbands who harm: Predicting spousal violence by men. J Fam Viol 3, 15–27 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994663
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994663