Skip to main content
Log in

Some antecedents of exclusivity in bilateral interorganizational relationships

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In bilateral interorganizational relationships, individual firm's self-interest is subordinate to the larger interest of the collective system. Bilateral governance is facilitated by exclusivity under certain conditions. Exclusive relationships draw partners closer and improve coordination. However, exclusivity leads to a loss of flexibility in dealing with turbulent environments. We test relationships between exclusivity and antecedent variables from transaction-cost analysis, resource-dependence theory, and organization theory. We find that while relationship-specific investment calls for more exclusivity, interdependence and rapid technological change call for less. Further, in the computer and semiconductor industry, exclusivity is negatively related to perceived effectiveness. Hence exclusivity should be used judiciously in the management of bilateral interrorganizational relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Electronics Association. (1988).american Electronics Association Directory. Palo Alto, CA: American Electronics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin. (1985). “The Salesperson as Outside Agent or Employee: A Transaction Cost Analysis,”Marketing Science 4(3), 234–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin, and Barton Weitz. (1992). “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels,”Journal of Marketing Research (February), 18–34.

  • Balakrishnan, Srinivasan, and Birger Wernerfelt. (1986). “Technical Change, Competition and Vertical Integration,”Strategic Management Journal 7, 347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, Louis P., and Sanjit Sengupta. (1993). “Organizing Successful Co-marketing Alliances,”Journal of Marketing (April), 32–46.

  • Chard, John S. (1986). “Economic Effects of Exclusive Purchasing Arrangements in the Distribution of Goods.” In Luca Pellegrini and Srinivas K. Reddy (eds.),Marketing Channels: Relationships and Performance (pp. 39–57). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr. (1979). “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,”Journal of Marketing Research (February), 64–73.

  • Cooper, Lee G., and Masao Nakanishi. (1983). “Standardizing Variables in Multiplicative Choice Models,”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (June), 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul H. Schurr, and Sejo Oh. (1987). “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships,”Journal of Marketing (April), 11–27.

  • Emerson, Richard. (1962). “Power Dependence Relations,”American Sociological Review 27, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, Jan B. (1994). “Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels,”Journal of Marketing (January), 71–85.

  • Heide, Jan B., and George John. (1990). “Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships,”Journal of Marketing Research (February), 24–36.

  • Nunnally, Jum C. (1978).Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, Stanley I. (1989). “Exclusive Dealing and Antitrust,”Antitrust Bulletin (Spring), 65–98.

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerald Salancik. (1978).The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, Robert S., and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. (1981).Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W. (1987). “Hybrid Organizational Arrangements: New Form or Transitional Development?”California Management Review (Fall), 67–87.

  • Ruekert, Robert W., and Orville C. Walker, Jr. (1987). “Marketing's Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence,”Journal of Marketing (January), 1–19.

  • Seidler, John (1974). “On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Data in Organization Analysis,”American Sociological Review (December), 816–831.

  • Stern, Louis W., and Adel I. El-Ansary. (1992).Marketing Channels (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van De Ven, Andrew H. (1976). “On the Nature, Formation, and Maintenance of Relations Among Organizations,”Academy of Management Review (October), 24–36.

  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1975).Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sengupta, S. Some antecedents of exclusivity in bilateral interorganizational relationships. Marketing Letters 6, 33–44 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994038

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994038

Key words

Navigation