Skip to main content
Log in

The sexuality of women in physically abusive marriages: A comparative study

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To examine female sexuality in physically abusive marriages, this study compared 60 abused women with a demographically matched sample of nonabused women in distressed marriages (aged 19–29). The physically abused women reported significantly lower levels of intimacy and compatibility in their marriages. In addition, abused women were found to evince a more traditional sex-role ideology, a greater negative or erotophobic disposition toward sex, and a stronger avoidance of sex than did nonabused women. Also, as compared to nonabused women in distressed marriages, the abused women rated themselves as having a lower degree of sexual assertiveness, arousability, and satisfaction. Despite these findings, the abused women reported a significantly greater frequency of sexual intercourse in their marriages than did the nonabused women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apt. C. V., and Hurlbert, D. F. (1992). Motherhood and female sexuality beyond one year postpartum: A study of military wives.J. Sex Ed. Ther. 18: 104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J., and Bernard, M. (1984).Fam. Relat. 33: 543–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J., Bernard, S., and Bernard, M. (1985). Courtship violence and sex typing.Fam. Relat. 34: 577–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., and Lifshitz, J. L. (1984). Self-reported sexual anxiety and sexual arousal: The expanded sexual arousability Inventory.J. Sex Res. 20: 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D., and Straus, M. (1986). Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples.Viol. Vict., 1: 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1970).Essentials of Psychological Testing, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1964).The Approval Motive: Students in Evaluative Dependence, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., and White, L. A. (1983). Emotional barriers to contraception. In Byrne, D., and Fisher, W. A. (eds.),Adolescents, Sex, and Contraception, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. pp. 207–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., White, L. A., and Kelly, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality.J. Sex Res. 25: 123–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoon, E. F., Hoon, P. W., and Wincze, J. P. (1976). An inventory for the measurement of female sexual arousability: The SAI.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. W. (1982).The Clinical Measurement Package, Dorsey, Homewood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. W. (1981). Development and use of indices and scales. In Grinnell, R. M. (ed.),Social Work Research and Evaluation, F. E. Peacock Publishers, Itasca, Ill., pp. 130–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, D. F. (1991). The role of assertiveness in female sexuality: A comparative study between sexually assertive and sexually nonassertive women.J. Sex Marit. Ther. 17: 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, D. F. (May, 1988). Teaching women with sexual desire disorder how to self-stimulate: Issues of assertiveness, self-esteem, and sexual scripts. Paper presented at the United States Army Annual Social Work Practice Conference, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX.

  • Hurlbert, D. F., and Apt, C. (1991). Sexual narcissism and the abusive male.J. Sex Marit. Ther. 17: 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, D. F., Whittaker, K. E., and Munoz, C. J. (1991). Etiological characteristics of abusive husbands.Milit. Med. 156: 670–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaats, C., and Davis, K. (1971). Effects of volunteer bias in studies of sexual behavior and attitudes.J. Sex Res. 7: 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalin, R., and Tilby, P. J. (1978). Development and validation of a sex-role ideology scale.Psychological Rep. 42: 731–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. C., Gipson, M. T., Kearl, A., and Kriskovich, M. (1989). Assessing sexual aversion in college students: The sexual aversion scale.J. Sex Marit. Ther. 15: 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. H., Abbott, D. A., and Adams, S. L. (1986). Family violence: Its relation to marital and parental satisfaction and family strengths.J. Fam. Viol. 1: 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D. (1988). Physical aggression between spouses: A social learning perspective. In Van Hasselt, V. B., Morrison, R. L., Bellack, A. S., and Hersen, M. (eds.),Handbook of Family Violence, Plenum, New York, pp. 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotkin, K. (1976). The phallacy of our sexual norms. In Kaplan, A., and Bean, J. (eds.),Beyond Sex-Role Stereotypes: Readings Toward a Psychology of Androgyny, Little, Brown, Boston, MA..

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, A. (1988). Methodological issues in marital violence research.J. Fam. Viol. 3: 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1969). The volunteer subject. In Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (eds.),Artifact in Behavioral Research, Academic Press, New York, pp. 59–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, J. M., and Dailey, D. M. (1989). Dyadic adjustment/sexual satisfaction in women and men as a function of psychological sex role self-perception.J. Sex Marit. Ther. 15: 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 16: 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, L. (1990). Sex and couples therapy: A method of treatment to enhance physical and emotional intimacy.J. Sex Marit. Ther. 16.

  • Russell, M. (1988). Wife assault theory, research, and treatment: A literature review.J. Fam. Viol. 3: 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonkin, J. (1985). The male batterer: An overview (Part 1).Military Family, January–February, 3–6.

  • Waring, E. M., Tillman, M. P., Frelick, L., Russell, L., and Weisz, G. (1980). Concepts of intimacy in the general population.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 118: 471–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, C. (1989). Thoughts about sex, love, and intimacy. In Kantor, D., and Okum, B. F. (eds.),Intimate Environments: Sex, Love, and Gender in Families New York: Guilford Press, pp. 108–128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apt, C., Hurlbert, D.F. The sexuality of women in physically abusive marriages: A comparative study. J Fam Viol 8, 57–69 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986993

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986993

Key words

Navigation