Skip to main content
Log in

Nectary structure and nectar characteristics in someBignoniaceae

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nectary structure and chemical nectar composition of 15 species belonging to 12 genera ofBignoniaceae are analyzed. All taxa bear a conspicuous nuptial nectary surrounding the ovary base. The secretory tissue is mostly supplied by phloem branches. The stomata are located in the middle and upper part of the nectary epidermis with an homogeneous distribution. The nuptial nectary is proportionally large in relation to the ovary (15–30%), disregarding the nectary volume. Most species have extranuptial nectaries in both inner and outer surfaces of the calyx. Both kinds of nectaries lack a vascular tissue that straightly supplies them. Nuptial nectar concentration (wt/wt) ranges from 19 to 68%. Sugars and amino acids are found in all species. Half of the species have hexose predominant nectars, the remaining sucrose predominant. Phenols are detected in only three species, whereas reducing acids exclusively inTecoma stans. Alkaloids and lipids were never detected. Extranuptial nectar chemical composition is analyzed in two species:Dolichandra cynanchoides andPodranea ricasoliana. Bees constitute the main flower visitors of the species studied whereas hummingbirds were seen visiting three species. A correlation analysis is performed with the data obtained. There are a few significant correlations which indicate a parallel increase of three parameters: the longer the flower length, the more voluminous the nectary and the higher stomata number, independently of the floral biotype. Phenograms are obtained using 24 floral characters including nectary and nectar data. The clusters obtained do not reflect taxonomic relationships but are useful in the understanding of animal-plant interactions when the flower biotype is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, H. G., 1978: Chemical aspects of the pollination biology of woody plants in the tropics. — InTomlinson, P. B., Zimmermann, M. H., (Eds): Tropical trees as living systems, pp. 57–82. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1973: Some anthecological aspects of the evolution of nectar-producing flowers, particularly amino acid production in nectar. — InHeywood, V. H., (Ed.): Taxonomy and ecology, pp. 243–264. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1977: Intraspecific constancy of floral nectar amino acid complements. — Bot. Gaz.138: 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1986: The occurrence and significance of amino acids in floral nectar. — Pl. Syst. Evol.151: 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belmonte, E., Cardemil, L., Kalin Arroyo, M. J., 1994: Floral nectary structure and nectar composition inEccremocarpus scaber (Bignoniaceae), a hummingbird-pollinated plant of central Chile. — Amer. J. Bot.81: 493–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocucci, A. A., Galetto, L., 1992: Estudios sobre la estructura del nectario y el síndrome floral enNicotiana (Solanaceae). — Darwiniana31: 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conn, H. J., Darrow, M. A., Emmel, V. M., 1960: Staining procedures. — Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafni, A., Lensky, Y., Fahn, A., 1988: Flower and nectar characteristics of nine species ofLabiatae and their influence on honeybee visits. — J. Apic. Res.27: 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpino, F., 1873–1874: Ulteriori osservazioni sulla dicogamia nel regno vegetale1 &2. — Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat.16: 1–199 and17: 200–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkee, L. T., Gaal, D. J., Reisner, W. H., 1981: The floral and extrafloral nectaries ofPassiflora. I. The floral nectary. — Amer. J. Bot.68: 453–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, T. S., 1983: Extrafloral nectaries: Their structure and distribution. — InBentley, B., Elias, T., (Eds): The biology of nectaries, pp. 174–203. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1975: Nectar: its production and functions in trumpet creeper. — Science189: 289–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1976: Morphology and anatomy of floral and extrafloral nectaries inCampsis (Bignoniaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.63: 1349–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabris, H. A., 1965: Flora Argentina:Bignoniaceae. — Revista Mus. La Plata, Secc. Bot.9: 273–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahn, A., 1979: Secretory tissues in plants. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. E., Worthington, R. D., Corral, R. D., 1985: Some floral nectar-sugar compositions from Durango and Sinaloa, Mexico. — Biotropica17: 309–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey-Wyssling, A., 1955: The phloem supply to the nectaries. — Acta Bot. Neerl.4: 358–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galetto, L., 1993: Estudios sobre el néctar enAsteridae Argentinas: análisis químico e histología comparada de las estructuras secretoras. — Doctoral thesis, University of Córdoba, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1992: Extrafloral nectaries that attract ants inBromeliaceae: structure and nectar composition. — Canad. J. Bot.70: 1101–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1993: Estructura del nectario, composición química del néctar y mecanismo de polinización en tres especies deSiphocampylus (Campanulaceae). — Kurtziana22: 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1994: Characteristics of secretion of nectar inPyrostegia venusta (Ker-Gawl.)Miers (Bignoniaceae). — New Phytol.127: 465–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, A. H., 1974: Co-evolutionary patterns in Central AmericaBignoniaceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.61: 728–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1980:Bignoniaceae—Part I (Crescentieae andTourrettieae). — Flora Neotropica Monograph25: 1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1991: An overview of the distribution and evolution of climbing plants. — InPutz, F., Bullock, S., Mooney, H., (Eds): Biology of climbing plants, pp. 3–42. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1992:Bignoniaceae-Part II (Tecomeae). — Flora Neotropica Monograph56: 1–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1984:Bignoniaceae. — InHunziker, A. T., (Ed.): Los géneros de Fanerogamas de Argentina, Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot.23: 68–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottsberger, G., Schrauwen, J., Linskens, H. F., 1984: Amino acids and sugars in nectar, and their putative evolutionary significance. — Pl. Syst. Evol.145: 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: Intraspecific variation in the amino acid content of floral nectar. — Bot. Acta102: 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1990: Variation in floral nectar amino acids with aging of flowers, pollen contamination, and flower damage. — Israel J. Bot.39: 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowda, D. C., Anjaneyalu, Y. V., 1979: Sugar composition of nectar inPyrostegia venusta. — Curr. Sci.48: 398–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, D. A., 1940: Plant microtechnique. — New York, London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koptur, S., 1994: Floral and extrafloral nectars of Costa RicanInga trees: a comparison of their constituents and composition. — Biotropica26: 276–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, R. C., 1974: Anatomic considerations of the calyx ofAdenocalymma comosum (Cham.) A.P. DC. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.61: 530–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J., 1988: NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. — New York: Exeter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets, E., 1986: Localization and systematic importance of the floral nectaries in theMagnoliatae (Dicotyledons). — Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg.56: 51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1988: Types of floral nectaries and the concepts “character” and “character-state”—a reconsideration. — Acta Bot. Neerl.37: 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J., 1979: Biometría. — Madrid: H. Blume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, E. E., Loper, G. M., Sadwick, S. E., 1981: Nectar production, composition, energetics and pollinator attractiveness in spring flowers of western New York. — Amer. J. Bot.68: 994–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, R. B., Inamdar, J. A., 1985: Occurrence, structure, ontogeny and biology of nectaries inKigelia pinnata DC. — Bot. Mag.98: 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1986: Nectaries inBignonia illicium L. Structure, ontogeny and functions. — Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.96: 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: The structure, secretion and biology of nectaries inTecomaria capensis Thunb. (Bignoniaceae). — Phytomorphology39: 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V., Dave, Y., 1992: Structure and biology of nectaries inTabebuia serratifolia Nichols (Bignoniaceae). — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.109: 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A., Vogel, S., 1986: The pollination syndrome ofDeplanchea tetraphylla (Bignoniaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.154: 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickers, S., 1993: La sécrétion des nectaires extra-floraux de quelques ínga en Guyane francaise. — Acta Bot. Gallica140: 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, M., 1932: Über die extrafloralen Nektarien der Angiospermen. — Bot. Zentralblatt Beih.49: 99–196.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galetto, L. Nectary structure and nectar characteristics in someBignoniaceae . Pl Syst Evol 196, 99–121 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985338

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985338

Key words

Navigation