Skip to main content
Log in

Hostility and stress as mediators of aggression in violent men

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research investigated hypothesized differences on the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory between five groups of men who varied in terms of being violent toward female cohabitants, nonfamily members, or no one, and in terms of marital satisfaction. Other measures, such as stress and childhood abuse data, were employed to interpret the findings. A two-way MANCOVA (group by race) with six sociodemographic covariates revealed significant differences on three Hostility Inventory subscales. The maritally violent men had significantly higher total Hostility than any of the other groups and were significantly discriminable from the other groups. Nonetheless, the beliefs and behaviors of violence-prone individuals overlap to some degree. A cognitive-behavioral model with stimulus variables of life Stressors, intervening variables of hostility and negative stress reactions, and response variables of different forms of aggression served as a framework for interpreting the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1973).Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1979). The social learning perspective: Mechanisms of aggression. In Toch, H. (ed.),Psychology of Crime and Criminal Justice, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Ross, D., and Ross, S. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models.J. Abnorm. Social Psychol. 67: 575–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barling, J., and Rosenbaum, A. (1986). Work Stressors and wife abuse.J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 346–348.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, O. W., and Lindsay, A. R. (1985, April).Therapists' Evaluations of Batterers' Stresses,Moods, and Power Relations, Papers presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

  • Briere, J. (1987). Predicting self-reported likelihood of battering: Attitudes and childhood experiences.Res. Personal. 21: 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A., and Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility.J. Consult. Psychol 2: 343–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney, M., and Roseman, R. (1985).Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders, Hemisphere, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denno, D. W. (1985, November).Family Income as a Predictor of Violent Crime: Still Strong After All These Years, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Diego, Calif.

  • Deschner, J. (1984).The Hitting Habit: Anger Control for Battering Couples, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. (1987). The outcome of court-mandated treatment for wife-assault: A quasi-experimental evaluation.Viol. Vict, 1: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. (1988).The Domestic Assault of Women, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D., and Browning, J. (1987). Power struggles and intimacy anxieties as causative factors of violence in intimate relationships. In Russell, G. (ed.),Violence in Intimate Relationships, Sage, Newbury Park, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D., and Strachan, C. (1987).The Prediction of Recidivism in a Population of Wife-Assaulters, Paper presented at the Third National Family Violence Research Conference, Durham, N.H.

  • Edleson, J. L., and Brygger, M. P. (1986). Gender differences in reporting of battering incidents.Fam. Relat. 35: 377–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, M. (1977). Theoretical considerations of violent marriages.Social Casework 58: 515- 526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlanger, H. S. (1979). Childhood punishment experiences and adult violence.Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 1: 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eron, L. D., Huesmann, L. R., Lefkowitz, M. M., and Walder, L. O. (1987). How learning conditions in early childhood -including mass media -relate to aggression in later adolescence.Psychological Rep. 9: 291–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J. (1988). Contributions of family violence research to criminal justice policy on wife assault: Paradigms of science and social control.Viol. Vict. 3: 159–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J., Stewart, D., and Hansen, K. (1983). Violent men or violent husbands? Background factors and situaiional correlates. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R., Hotaling, G., and Straus, M. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, K. M. (1980). Stress and family violence. In Straus, M. A. and Hotaling, G. T. (eds.),The Social Causes of Husband-To-Wife Violence, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 94–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganley, A. (1981).Participant's Manual: Court-Mandated Therapy for Men Who Batter: A Three Day Workshop for Professionals, Center for Women Policy Studies, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganley, A., and Harris, L. (1978).Domestic Violence: Issues in Designing and Implementing Programs for Male Batterers, Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

  • Gelles, R. (1974).The Violent Home, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. (1982). Domestic criminal violence. In Wolfgang, M., and Weiner, N. (eds.),Criminal Violence, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. (1985a). Anger and oppression in men who batter: Empiricist and feminist perspectives and their implications for research.Victimology 10: 311–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. (1985b). Fighting for control: A clinical assessment of men who batter.Social Casework 66: 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. (1969). Violence among intimates. In Staff Report of the National Commission on Causes and Prevention of Violence.Crimes of Violence Vol. 13, National Commission on Crime, Washington, D.C., pp. 941–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., and Hastings, J. E. (1986). Characteristics of spouse abusers.J. Interpers. Viol. 1: 363–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., and Hastings, J. E. (1989). Counseling male spouse abusers: Characteristics of treatment completers and dropouts.Viol Vict. 4: 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, J. E., and Hamberger, L. K. (1988). Personality characteristics of spouse abusers: A controlled comparison.Viol. Vict. 3: 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshmond, L. S. T. (1987). Judgment of anger problems by clients and therapists.J. Interpers. Viol. 251–263.

  • Hotaling, G., and Straus, M. (1980). Culture, social organization, and irony in the study of family violence. In Straus, M., and Hotaling, G. (eds.),Social Causes of Husband-Wife Violence.

  • Howell, M. J., and Pugeliesi, K. L. (1988). Husbands who harm: Predicting spousal violence by men.J. Fam. Viol. 3(1): 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleckner, J. (1978). Wife beaters and beaten wives: Co-conspirators in crimes of violence.Psychology 15: 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruttschnitt, C., Heath, L., and Ward, D. (1986). Family violence, television viewing habits, and other experiences related to violent criminal behavior.Criminology 24: 235–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H., & Wallace, K. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity.Marr. Fam. Liv. 21: 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacEwen, K. E., and Barling, J. (1988). Multiple Stressors, violence in the family of origin, and marital aggression: A longitudinal investigation.J. Fam. Viol. 3: 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M., and George, C. (1985). Responses of abused and disadvantaged toddlers to distress in agemates: A study in a day care setting.Dev. Psychol. 21: 407–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiuro, R., Cahn, T., and Vitaliano, P. (1986). Assertiveness deficits and hostility in domestically violent men.Viol. Vict. 1: 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiuro, R., Cahn, T., and Vitaliano, P. (1988). Anger, hostility, and depression in domestically violent versus generally assaultive men and nonviolent control subjects.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56: 17–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makman, R. (1978). Some clinical aspects of inter-spousal violence. In Eikelaan, J., and Katz, S. (eds.),Family Violence: An International and Interdisciplinary Study, Butterworths, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (1976).Battered Wives, Glide, San Francisco, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowall, D. (1986). Poverty and homicide in Detroit, 1926–1978.Viol. Vict. 1: 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, G. (1979).Understanding Violence, Lippincott, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novaco, R. (1975).Anger Control: The Development and Evaluation of an Experimental Treatment, Lexington, Lexington, Mass.

  • O'Leary, K. D. (1988). Physical aggression between spouses: A social learning perspective. In Van Hasselt, V. B., Morrison, R., Bellack, A., and Hersen, M. (eds.),Handbook of Family Violence, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D., and Arias, I. (1984, August).Assessing Agreement of Reports of Spouse Abuse, Paper presented at the National Family Violence Research Conference. Durham, NH.

  • Riggs, D. S., Murphy, C. M., and O'Leary, K. D. (1989). Intentional falsification in reports of interpartner aggression.J. Interpers. Viol. 4: 220–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, B., and Widom, C. S. (1990). Childhood victimization and violent offending.Viol. Vict. 5, 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (1987). Psychosocial characteristics of batterers: A study of 234 men charged with domestic violence offenses.J. Fam. Viol. 2: 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, A., and O'Leary, K. D. (1981). Children: The unintended victims of marital violence.Am. J, Orthopsychiatry 51: 692–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M. (1988). Wife assault theory, research, and treatment: A literature review.J. Fam. Viol. 3: 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D., and Hanusa, D. (1984).Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Abusive Husbands: The Short Term Effects of Group Therapy, Paper presented at the Second National Conference of Domestic Violence Researchers, Durham, NH.

  • Shields, N., McCall, G., and Hanneke, C. (1988). Patterns of family and nonfamily violence: Violent husbands and violent men.Viol. Vict. 3: 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. (1977), Wife beating: How common and why?Victimology 1: 54–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales.Man. Fam. 41: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M., Gelles, R., and Steinmetz, S. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szinovacz, M. E. (1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence.J. Marr. Fam. 45: 633–644.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnett, O.W., Fagan, R.W. & Booker, J.M. Hostility and stress as mediators of aggression in violent men. J Fam Viol 6, 217–241 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00980530

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00980530

Key words

Navigation