Skip to main content
Log in

A risk marker analysis of assaulted wives

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the wife assault literature, a number of risk markers have been identified. Using the data of the female respondents to the National Family Violence Survey (n = 699), a multivariate analysis was performed to examine which risk factors best differentiated between women involved in nonviolent relationships, verbally aggressive relationships, relationships exhibiting minor physical aggression and severely violent relationships. High levels of marital conflict and lower socioeconomic status emerged as the primary predictors of an increased likelihood of wife assault. Research implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coser, L. A. (1967).Continuities in the Study of Social Conflict, Free Press New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J., and Straus, M. A. (1988).Intimate Violence: The Definitive Study of the Causes and Consequences of Abuse in the American Family, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartik, L. M. (1978).Identification or personality characteristics and self-concept factors of battered wives. Unpublished dissertation, United States International University.

  • Hudson, W. W., and McIntosh, S. R. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable divisions.J. Marr. Fam., 43(4): 872–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (1980). Culture, social organization, and irony in the study of family violence. In Straus, M. A., and Hotaling, G. T. (eds.),The Social Causes of Husband-Wife Violence, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 3–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotaling, G. T., and Sugarman, D. B. (1984). An identification or risk factors. In Bowen, G. L., Straus, M. A., Sedlak, A. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Sugarman, D. B. (eds.),Domestic Violence Surveillance System Feasibility Study. Phase I Report: Identification of outcome and Risk Factors (pp. 3−1 to 3−66). Rockville, MD: Westat, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotaling, G. T., and Sugarman, D. B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge.Viol. Vict. 101–124.

  • Kalmuss, D. A. (1984). The intergenerational transmission of marital agression.J. Mart. Fam. 46: 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Last, J. M. (1983).A Dictionary of Epidemiology, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagelow, M. D. (1984).Family Violence, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, A., and O'Leary, K. D. (1981). Marital violence: Characteristics of abusive couples.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 49: 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, M. (1979).A survey of spousal violence against women in Kentucky, Study 792701 for the Kentucky Commission on Women, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice-LEAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlak, A. J. (1988). Prevention of wife abuse. In Van Hasselt, V. B., Morrison, R. L., Bellack, A. S., and Hersen, M. (eds.),Handbook of Family Violence, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 319–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E., Flitcraft, A., Zuckerman, D., Gray, A., Robinson, J., and Frazier, W. (1981).Wife abuse in the medical setting: An introduction for health personnel, Monograph No. 7. Washington, D.C.: Office of Domestic Violence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactic (CT) scales.J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor/Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., and Smith C. (1989). Family patterns and primary prevention of family violence. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (Eds.),Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, D. B., and Hotaling, G. t. (1986 April).Violent Males in Intimate Relationships: An Analysis of Risk Factors, Paper to be presented at the Eastern Psychological Association meetings, New York, NY.

  • Telch, C. F., and Lindquist, C. U. (1984). Violent versus non-violent couples: A comparison of patterns.Psychotherapy 21: 242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1979).The battered woman, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1983). The battered woman syndrome study. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Berverly Hills, pp. 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hotaling, G.T., Sugarman, D.B. A risk marker analysis of assaulted wives. J Fam Viol 5, 1–13 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979135

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979135

Key words

Navigation