Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating programs for men who batter: Problems and prospects

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The uncertainty and controversy that surround batterer programs beg more systematic evaluation of program effectiveness. The current national surveys and limited evaluations of batterer programs point to several methodological improvements that include comparisons of program modalities, observation study of the group interaction, and more sensitive measures of abuse. Therefore, suggestions for future evaluations are posed, and continuing problematic areas, such as access to the victim, sensitized responses, selectivity of clients, and community context, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, D., and McCormick, A. (1982). Men unlearning violence: A group approach based on the collective model. In Roy, M. (ed.),The Abusive Partner. Van Norstrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 170–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. L., and Bernard, M. L. (1984). The abusive male seeking treatment: Jekyll and Hyde.Family Rel. 33: 543–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bograd, M. (1984). Family systems approaches to wife battering: A feminist critique.Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 54: 558–568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, L. (1983).Beating Wife Beating, D. C. Heath, Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breines, W., and Gordon, L. (1983). The new scholarship on family violence.Signs 8: 490–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisson, N. (1982). Helping men who batter women.Public. Wel. 40: 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, A., and Shumaker, S. A. (1984). Social support: An introduction to a complex phenomenon.J. Soc. Is. 40: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, A., and Shumaker, S. A. (1985). Where do we go from here? The policy implications of social support.J. Soc. Is. 41: 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschner, J. (1984).The Hitting Habit, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D., and Painter, S. L. (1981). Traumatic bonding: The development of emotional attachments in battered women and other relationships of intermittent abuse.Victimology 6: 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, M., and Myers, T. (1984). Helping men who batter: Profile of programs in the United States. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, NH.

  • Edleson, J. (1984a). Working with men who batter.Social Work 29: 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edleson, J. (1984b). Violence is the issue: A critique of Neidig's assumptions.Victimology 9: 483–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edleson, J. (1985). Men who batter women: A critical review of the evidence.J. Family Is. 6: 229–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edleson, J., and Grusznski, R. (1986). Treating men who batter: Four years of outcome data from the Domestic Abuse Project. Unpublished manuscript from the Domestic Abuse Project, Minneapolis, Minn.

  • Edleson, J., Miller, D., Stone, G., and Chapman, D. (1985). Group treatment for men who batter: A multiple-base line evaluation.Soc. Work Res. Abs. 21: 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feazell, C. S., Mayers, R. S., and Deschner, J. (1984). Services for men who batter: Implications for programs and policies.Family Rel. 33: 217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K., and Johnson, J. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization.Social Prob. 30: 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D. (1983). Common features of family abuse. In Finkelhor, D. Gelles, R., Hotaling, G., and Straus, M. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. (1985). Men's domestic violence treatment groups: A statewide survey.Soc. Work Groups 8: 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. (1979).Stopping Wife Abuse, Anchor Books, Garden City, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamache, D., Edleson, J., and Schock, M. (1984). Coordinated police, judicial and social service response to woman battering: A multiple-baseline evaluation across three communities. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, N.H.

  • Goldstein, D., and Rosenbaum, A. (1985). An evaluation of the self-esteem of maritally violent men.Family Rel. 34: 425–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. (1984). How some men stop battering: An evaluation of a group counseling program. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, N.H.

  • Gondolf, E. (1985a).Men Who Batter: An Integrated Approach for Stopping Wife Abuse, Learning Publications, Holmes Beach, Fl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. (1985b). Anger and oppression in men who batter: Empiricist and feminist perspectives and their implications for research.Victimology 10: 311–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. (1985c). Fighting for control: A clinical assessment of men who batter.Social Case 65: 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. (under review). Changing men who batter: A developmental model for integrated intervention.Am. J. Orthopsychiat.

  • Hart, B. (1984). What every researcher and clinician should know about the battered woman's shelter movement. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, N.H.

  • Hudson, W., and McIntosh, S. (1981). The Assessment of Spouse Abuse: Two Quantifiable Dimensions.J. Marriage Family 42: 873–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janoff-Bulman, R., and Frieze, I. (1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization.J. Soc. Is. 39: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linquist, C., Telch, C. F., and Taylor, J. (1982). Evaluation of a conjugal violence treatment program: A pilot study.Behav. Conns. Commun. Interven. 3: 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (1976).Battered Wives, Pocket Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettger, Z. (1982). Help for men who batter: An overview of issues and programs.Response 5: 1–2, 7–8, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, E., and LaRosa, J. (1986). Delinquency cessation and adolescent development: Preliminary data.Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 56: 212–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neidig, P. (1984). Women's shelters, men's collectives and other issues in the field of spouse abuse.Victimology 9: 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidig, P., Collins, B., and Friedman, D. (1984). Attitudinal characteristics of males who have engaged in spouse abuse. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, N.H.

  • Neidig, P., Friedman, D., and Collins, B. (1985). Domestic conflict containment: A spouse abuse treatment program.Social Case 66: 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pence, E. (1983). The Duluth Domestic Abuse Intervention Project.Hamline Law Rev. 6: 247–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirog-Good, M., and Stets-Kealey, J. (1985). Male batterers and battering prevention programs: A national survey.Response 8: 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, F., and Nickle, N. (1981). Practice principles for working with groups of men who batter.Soc. Work Groups 4: 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (1982). A national survey of services for batterers. In Roy, M. (ed.),The Abusive Partner, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (1984). Intervention with the abusive partner. In Roberts, A. (ed.),Battered Women and Their Families, Springer, New York, pp. 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M. (ed.) (1982).The Abusive Partner, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, E., Pleck, J., Grossman, M., and Bart, P. (1979). The battered data syndrome: A reply to Steinmetz.Victimology 2: 680–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. (1984a). Helping husbands who batter.Social Case 65: 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. (1984b). Issues in conducting treatment research with men who batter. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, N.H.

  • Saunders, D., and Hanusa, D. (1984). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of abusive husbands: The short-term effects of group therapy. Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, N.H.

  • Schechter, S. (1982).Women and Male Violence: The Visions and Struggles of the Battered Women's Movement. South End Press, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., and Berk, R. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault.Am. Sociol. Rev. 49: 261–272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sonkin, D., Martin, D., and Walker, L. (1985).The Male Batterer: A Treatment Approach, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, W., and Shupe, A. (1984).An Evaluation of Three Programs for Abusive Men In Texas. Research Monograph No. 29, Center for Social Research, The University of Texas at Arlington.

  • Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales.J. Marriage Family 41: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M., Gelles, R., and Steinmetz, S. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family. Anchor/Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szinovac, M. (1983). Using couples data as a methodological tool: The case of Marital Violence.J. Marriage Family 45: 633–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (1984). Structured conjoint therapy for spouse abuse cases.Social Case 64: 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1979).The Battered Woman, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1984).The Battered Woman Syndrome, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidman, A. (1986). Family therapy with violent couples. Social Case 66: 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, J., and Dreen, K. (1982). Wife beating: A view of the marital dyad.Social Case 63: 259–265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gondolf, E.W. Evaluating programs for men who batter: Problems and prospects. J Fam Viol 2, 95–108 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976373

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976373

Key words

Navigation