Skip to main content
Log in

DNA analysis of tropical plant species: An assessment of different drying methods

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Use of molecular techniques to study plant systematics has been restricted to either largely temperate groups or groups from which seed is readily obtained. Dried material has advantages over other methods of preservation for molecular analyses; it is cheap, easily undertaken, overcomes the difficulties associated with seed recalcitrance and the absence of seeding plants in the field, and most taxonomists are familiar with the method. Three drying techniques were assessed using material collected in the tropics. No differences in either the quantity or the quality of DNA extracted from material dried by these methods was detected. The implications of using dried material in molecular analyses are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chase, M. W., Hills, H. H., 1991: Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. — Taxon40: 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, H. F., Roberts, E. H., 1980: Recalcitrant crop seeds. — Kuala Lumpur: Tropical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D., Cullis, C. A., 1987: Chloroplast DNA variability amongLinum species. — Amer. J. Bot.74: 260–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Do, N., Adams, R. P., 1991: A simple technique for removing plant polysaccharide contaminants from plant DNA. — BioTechniques10: 162–166.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. J., 1991: DNA protocols for plants. — InHewitt, G. M., Johnston, A. W. B., Young, J. P. W., (Eds): Molecular techniques in taxonomy, pp. 283–293. — Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. — Syst. Bot.17: 144–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1987: Preservation of plant species for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. — Taxon36: 715–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Doyle, J. L., 1987: A rapid isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. — Phytochem. Bull.19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, A. P., Vogelstein, B., 1983: A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. — Anal. Biochem.132: 6–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, W. L., Bedbrook, J. R., 1979: Cloning and characterisation of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley. — Nucleic Acids Res.7: 1869–1885.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golenberg, E. M., 1991: Amplification and analysis of Miocene plant fossil DNA. — Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B333: 419–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Giannassi, D. E., Clegg, M. T., Smiley, C. J., Durbin, M., Henderson, D., Zurawski, G., 1990: Chloroplast DNA sequence from a MioceneMagnolia species. — Nature344: 656–658.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J. F., 1972: Seed storage and longevity. — InKozlowski, T. T., (Ed.): Seed biology, 3, pp. 145–245. — New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. A., Ingram, R., 1991: Chloroplast DNA and biosystematics: the effects of intraspecific diversity and plastid transmission. — Taxon40: 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, R. K., Palmer, J. D., 1988: Phylogenetic implications of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in theMutisieae (Asteraceae). — Amer. J. Bot.75: 753–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, M., Doyle, J. J., Palmer, J. D., 1990: Evolutionary significance of the loss of the chloroplast DNA inverted repeat in theLeguminosae subfam.Papilionoideae. — Evol.44: 390–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Mathews, S., Hughes, C., 1991: Chloroplast DNA variation inGliricidia sepium (Leguminosae): intraspecific phylogeny and tokogeny. — Amer. J. Bot.78: 1576–1585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehaväslaiho, H., Saura, A., Lokki, J., 1987: Chloroplast DNA variation in the grass tribeFestuceae. — Theor. Appl. Genet.74: 298–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liston, A., Rieseberg, L. H., Mistretta, O., 1990a: Ribosomal DNA evidence for hybridisation between island endemic species ofLotus. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.18: 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —,Adams, R. P., Do, N., Zhu, G.-I., 1990b: A method for collecting dried plant specimens for DNA and isozyme analyses and the results of a field test in Xinjiang, China. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.77: 859–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F., Sambrook, J., 1982: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. — Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, B. G., 1992: Plant DNA isolation. — InHoelzel, A. R., (Ed.): Molecular genetic analysis of populations. A practical approach, pp. 59–88. — Oxford: IRL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munthali, M., Ford-Lloyd, B. V., Newbury, H. J., 1992: The random amplification of polymorphic DNA for fingerprinting plants. — PCR Methods Appl.1: 274–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nybom, H., 1991: Applications of DNA fingerprinting in plant breeding. — InBurke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A. J., Wolff, R., (Eds): DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications, pp. 294–311. — Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, M. M., Adams, R. P., 1989: In situ preservation of DNA in plant specimens. — Taxon38: 576–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L. H., Soltis, D. E., Palmer, J. D., 1988: A molecular re-examination of introgression betweenHelianthus annuus andH. bolanderi (Compositae). — Evolution42: 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. H., 1973: Predicting the storage life of seeds. — Seed Sci. Technol.1: 499–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. O., Bendich, A. J., 1985: Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium, and mummified plant tissues. — Pl. Mol. Biol.5: 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollo, F., 1985: Characterisation by molecular hybridisation of RNA fragments isolated from ancient (1400 BC) seeds. — Theor. Appl. Genet.71: 330–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Marca, A. L., Amici, A., 1987: Nucleic acids in mummified plant seeds: screening of twelve specimens by gel-electrophoresis, molecular hybridisation an DNA cloning. — Theor. Appl. Genet.73: 501–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Venanzi, F. M., Amici, A., 1991: Nucleic acids in mummified plant seeds: biochemistry and molecular genetics of pre-Columbian maize. — Genet. Res. Chamb.58: 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandbrink, J. M., Geurts, L. J. N. M., Gadella, T. W. J., van Brederode, J., 1989: Chloroplast DNA variation inSilene sect.Elisanthe demonstratesSilene noctiflora L. is not properly classified. — Biochem. Syst. Evol.17: 539–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, B. A., Learn, G. H., 1988: Ribosomal DNA variation within and among plant populations. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1207–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Milligan, B. G., 1991: Intraspecific chloroplast DNA variation: systematic and phylogenetic implications. — InSoltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 117–150. — London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, 1992: AnrbcL sequence from a MioceneTaxodium (bald cypress). — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA89: 449–451.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sørenson, M., 1990: Observations on distribution, ecology, and cultivation of the tuberbearing legume genusPachyrhizus Rich. ex DC. — Wageningen Agricult. Univ. Papers90-3: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, W. T., Lewin, R. A., Cheng, L., 1989: DNA conservation for taxonomic studies. — J. Phycol.25: 615–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sytsma, K. J., Gottlieb, L. D., 1986: Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships inClarkia sect.Peripetasma (Onagraceae). — Evol.40: 1248–1261.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Schaal, B. A., 1985: Phylogenetics of theLisianthius skinneri (Gentianaceae) species complex in Panama utilizing DNA restriction fragment analysis. — Evol.39: 594–608.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, S.A. DNA analysis of tropical plant species: An assessment of different drying methods. Pl Syst Evol 188, 57–64 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937835

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937835

Key words

Navigation