Abstract
Use of molecular techniques to study plant systematics has been restricted to either largely temperate groups or groups from which seed is readily obtained. Dried material has advantages over other methods of preservation for molecular analyses; it is cheap, easily undertaken, overcomes the difficulties associated with seed recalcitrance and the absence of seeding plants in the field, and most taxonomists are familiar with the method. Three drying techniques were assessed using material collected in the tropics. No differences in either the quantity or the quality of DNA extracted from material dried by these methods was detected. The implications of using dried material in molecular analyses are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chase, M. W., Hills, H. H., 1991: Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. — Taxon40: 215–220.
Chin, H. F., Roberts, E. H., 1980: Recalcitrant crop seeds. — Kuala Lumpur: Tropical Press.
Coates, D., Cullis, C. A., 1987: Chloroplast DNA variability amongLinum species. — Amer. J. Bot.74: 260–268.
Do, N., Adams, R. P., 1991: A simple technique for removing plant polysaccharide contaminants from plant DNA. — BioTechniques10: 162–166.
Doyle, J. J., 1991: DNA protocols for plants. — InHewitt, G. M., Johnston, A. W. B., Young, J. P. W., (Eds): Molecular techniques in taxonomy, pp. 283–293. — Heidelberg: Springer.
—, 1992: Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. — Syst. Bot.17: 144–163.
—, 1987: Preservation of plant species for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. — Taxon36: 715–722.
—,Doyle, J. L., 1987: A rapid isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. — Phytochem. Bull.19: 11–15.
Feinberg, A. P., Vogelstein, B., 1983: A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. — Anal. Biochem.132: 6–13.
Gerlach, W. L., Bedbrook, J. R., 1979: Cloning and characterisation of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley. — Nucleic Acids Res.7: 1869–1885.
Golenberg, E. M., 1991: Amplification and analysis of Miocene plant fossil DNA. — Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B333: 419–427.
—,Giannassi, D. E., Clegg, M. T., Smiley, C. J., Durbin, M., Henderson, D., Zurawski, G., 1990: Chloroplast DNA sequence from a MioceneMagnolia species. — Nature344: 656–658.
Harrington, J. F., 1972: Seed storage and longevity. — InKozlowski, T. T., (Ed.): Seed biology, 3, pp. 145–245. — New York: Academic Press.
Harris, S. A., Ingram, R., 1991: Chloroplast DNA and biosystematics: the effects of intraspecific diversity and plastid transmission. — Taxon40: 393–412.
Jansen, R. K., Palmer, J. D., 1988: Phylogenetic implications of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in theMutisieae (Asteraceae). — Amer. J. Bot.75: 753–766.
Lavin, M., Doyle, J. J., Palmer, J. D., 1990: Evolutionary significance of the loss of the chloroplast DNA inverted repeat in theLeguminosae subfam.Papilionoideae. — Evol.44: 390–402.
—,Mathews, S., Hughes, C., 1991: Chloroplast DNA variation inGliricidia sepium (Leguminosae): intraspecific phylogeny and tokogeny. — Amer. J. Bot.78: 1576–1585.
Lehaväslaiho, H., Saura, A., Lokki, J., 1987: Chloroplast DNA variation in the grass tribeFestuceae. — Theor. Appl. Genet.74: 298–302.
Liston, A., Rieseberg, L. H., Mistretta, O., 1990a: Ribosomal DNA evidence for hybridisation between island endemic species ofLotus. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.18: 239–244.
—, —,Adams, R. P., Do, N., Zhu, G.-I., 1990b: A method for collecting dried plant specimens for DNA and isozyme analyses and the results of a field test in Xinjiang, China. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.77: 859–863.
Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F., Sambrook, J., 1982: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. — Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Publications.
Milligan, B. G., 1992: Plant DNA isolation. — InHoelzel, A. R., (Ed.): Molecular genetic analysis of populations. A practical approach, pp. 59–88. — Oxford: IRL Press.
Munthali, M., Ford-Lloyd, B. V., Newbury, H. J., 1992: The random amplification of polymorphic DNA for fingerprinting plants. — PCR Methods Appl.1: 274–276.
Nybom, H., 1991: Applications of DNA fingerprinting in plant breeding. — InBurke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, A. J., Wolff, R., (Eds): DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications, pp. 294–311. — Basel: Birkhäuser.
Pyle, M. M., Adams, R. P., 1989: In situ preservation of DNA in plant specimens. — Taxon38: 576–581.
Rieseberg, L. H., Soltis, D. E., Palmer, J. D., 1988: A molecular re-examination of introgression betweenHelianthus annuus andH. bolanderi (Compositae). — Evolution42: 227–238.
Roberts, E. H., 1973: Predicting the storage life of seeds. — Seed Sci. Technol.1: 499–514.
Rogers, S. O., Bendich, A. J., 1985: Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium, and mummified plant tissues. — Pl. Mol. Biol.5: 69–76.
Rollo, F., 1985: Characterisation by molecular hybridisation of RNA fragments isolated from ancient (1400 BC) seeds. — Theor. Appl. Genet.71: 330–333.
—,Marca, A. L., Amici, A., 1987: Nucleic acids in mummified plant seeds: screening of twelve specimens by gel-electrophoresis, molecular hybridisation an DNA cloning. — Theor. Appl. Genet.73: 501–505.
—,Venanzi, F. M., Amici, A., 1991: Nucleic acids in mummified plant seeds: biochemistry and molecular genetics of pre-Columbian maize. — Genet. Res. Chamb.58: 193–201.
Sandbrink, J. M., Geurts, L. J. N. M., Gadella, T. W. J., van Brederode, J., 1989: Chloroplast DNA variation inSilene sect.Elisanthe demonstratesSilene noctiflora L. is not properly classified. — Biochem. Syst. Evol.17: 539–548.
Schaal, B. A., Learn, G. H., 1988: Ribosomal DNA variation within and among plant populations. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1207–1216.
Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Milligan, B. G., 1991: Intraspecific chloroplast DNA variation: systematic and phylogenetic implications. — InSoltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 117–150. — London: Chapman & Hall.
—, —, 1992: AnrbcL sequence from a MioceneTaxodium (bald cypress). — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA89: 449–451.
Sørenson, M., 1990: Observations on distribution, ecology, and cultivation of the tuberbearing legume genusPachyrhizus Rich. ex DC. — Wageningen Agricult. Univ. Papers90-3: 1–38.
Stam, W. T., Lewin, R. A., Cheng, L., 1989: DNA conservation for taxonomic studies. — J. Phycol.25: 615–616.
Sytsma, K. J., Gottlieb, L. D., 1986: Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships inClarkia sect.Peripetasma (Onagraceae). — Evol.40: 1248–1261.
—,Schaal, B. A., 1985: Phylogenetics of theLisianthius skinneri (Gentianaceae) species complex in Panama utilizing DNA restriction fragment analysis. — Evol.39: 594–608.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harris, S.A. DNA analysis of tropical plant species: An assessment of different drying methods. Pl Syst Evol 188, 57–64 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937835
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937835