Skip to main content
Log in

A new method for measuring power output in a single leg extension: feasibility, reliability and validity

  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A method is described for measuring the explosive power of the leg in extension which has been found safe and acceptable for all age groups and levels of physical capability. The extension movement takes 0.25–0.40 s in a push through 0.165 m against a flat pedal. At the end of the push the leg is fully extended. The movement is made seated so that the forces are contained between the buttocks and the foot. The seat position is adjusted for leg length and the push is transmitted by a lever and chain to spin a flywheel. The gearing is such that resistance to the movement remains nearly constant throughout the extension. The final angular velocity of the flywheel is measured by an optoswitch and used to calculated the average leg extensor power (LEP) in the push. The reliability of the power measurement was evaluated in 46 subjects ranging in age from 20 to 86 years; they included medical students and geriatric day patients. They were tested on two occasions separated by a week. The maximal values on the first occasion (best of at least five trials) ranged from 30 to 300 W (mean ± 1 SD = 154 ± 88 W). There was no significant difference on re-test and the coefficient of variation was 9.4%. In a subgroup of 9 non-naive subjects who were measured by an experienced observer it was 6.3%. As expected, power was lower in women than in men and declined sharply with age. The sex difference was less when the values were expressed as power per body mass; a sharp age-related decline remained. The results from the LEP rig were compared with results obtained in the same subjects on the same occasion from similar pushes against an isokinetic dynamometer and two-legged jumps on a force plate. There was a highly significant correlation in both cases, Spearman's rank correlation (rho) = 0.73,P < 0.001,n = 16 subjects (age 27 ± 7.5 years) and rho = 0.86,P < 0.001,n = 13 subjects (age 39 ± 10.4 years) respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asmussen E, Bonde-Petersen F (1974) Storage of elastic energy in skeletal muscles in man. Acta Physiol Scand 91:385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassey EJ (1986) Demi-span as a measure of skeletal size. Ann Hum Biol 13:499–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassey EJ, Bateman JC, Short AH (1989) A new short test of power output from the lower limbs in man. J Physiol (Lond) 409:21 P

  • Bell DG, Jacobs I (1986) Electromechanical response times and rate of force development in males and females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 18:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosco C, Komi PV (1980) Influence of ageing on the mechanical behaviour of leg extensor muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol 45:209–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosco C, Luhtanen P, Komi PV (1983) A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping. Eur J Appl Physiol 50:273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies CTM, Rennie M (1968) Human power output. Nature 217:770–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies CTM, Wemyss-Holden J, Young K (1984) Measurement of short term power output: comparison between cycling and jumping. Ergonomics 27:285–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieve DW, Linden J van der (1986) Force, velocity and power output of the human upper limb during horizontal pulls. Eur J Appl Physiol 55:425–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy MJR (1958) Variations within individuals in human biology. Hum Biol 30:210

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubley CL, Wells RP (1983) A work-energy approach to determine the individual joint contributions to vertical jump performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 50:247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson T (1982) Age-related differences in isometric and dynamic strength and endurance. Phys Ther 7:985–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones NL, McCartney N (1986) Influence of muscle power on aerobic performance and the effects of training. Acta Med Scand [Suppl] 711:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson L, Grimby G, Karlsson J (1979) Muscle strength and velocity of movement in relation to age and muscle morphology. J Appl Physiol 46:451–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Makrides L, Heigenhauser GJF, McCartney N, Jones NL (1985) Maximal short term exercise capacity in healthy subjects aged 15–70 years. Clin Sci 69:197–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Margaria R, Aghemo P, Rovelli E (1966) Measurement of muscular power (anaerobic) in man. J Appl Physiol 21:1662–1664

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartney N, Heigenhauser GJF, Sargeant AJ, Jones NL (1983) A constant velocity cycle ergometer for the study of dynamic muscle function. J Appl Physiol 55:212–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris AF, Clarke DH, Dainis A (1983) Time to maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC) for 5 different muscle groups in college adults. Res Q 54:163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray MP, Gardner GM, Mollinger LA, Sepic SB (1980) Strength of isometric and isokinetic contractions: knee muscles of men aged 20–56 years. Phys Ther 60:412–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray MP, Duthie EH, Gambert SR, Sepic SB, Mollinger LA (1985) Age-related differences in knee muscle strength in normal women. J Gerontol 40:275–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton JF, Duggan A (1987) An evaluation of tests of anaerobic power. Aviat Space Environ Med 58:237–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant AJ (1987) Effect of muscle temperature on leg extension force and short-term power output in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:693–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant AJ, Hoinville E, Young A (1981) Maximum leg force and power output during short-term dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol 51:1175–1182

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandewalle H, Peres G, Heller J, Panel J, Monod H (1987) Force-velocity relationship and maximal power on a cycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:650–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie DR (1950) The relation between force and velocity in human muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 110:249–280

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bassey, E.J., Short, A.H. A new method for measuring power output in a single leg extension: feasibility, reliability and validity. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 60, 385–390 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713504

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713504

Key words

Navigation