Abstract
In June 1993, an international effort (SPICE) was launched to develop a standard for software process assessment. An important goal of this effort is to harmonize existing process assessment approaches. This paper describes and characterizes SEI and SPICE software process assessment work and then highlights the similamties and differences. The following aspects are considered-underlying philosophy, goals, scope/domain, rating processes, underlying reference model, tailorability and impact on the international software community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Houston Begins Site Programming Study,Houston Today (FSD Communications Department, Houston, Texas, August 20, 1984).
R. Radice, J.T. Harding, P.E. Munnis and R.W. Phillips, A Programming Process Study,IBM Systems Journal, 1985, volume 24, pages 91–101.
W.S. Humphrey and D.H. Kitson,Preliminary Report on Conducting SEI-Assisted Assessments of Software Engineering Capability (Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1987).
WG10 Meeting Kwa Maritane: Proposal for Changes to the Architecture, 1995, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7/ WG10 N080.
W.S. Humphrey and W.L. Sweet,A Method for Assessing the Software Engineering Capability of Contractors (Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1987).
W.S. Humphrey, D.H. Kitson and T. Kasse,The State of Software Engineering Practice: A Preliminary Report (Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1987).
W.S. Humphrey,Managing the Software Process (Addison-Wesley, 1989).
W.S. Humphrey, D.H. Kitson and J. Gale,A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Software Process Maturity (Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1991).
D.H. Kitson and S.M. Masters,An Analysis of SEI Software Process Assessment Results: 1987–1991 (Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1992).
M.C. Paulk, B. Curtis, M.B. Chrissis and C.V. Weber,The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process (Addison-Wesley, 1995).
J. Herbsleb, A. Carleton, J. Rozum, J. Siegel and D. Zubrow,Benefits of CMM-based Software Process Improvement: Initial Results (Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1994).
D. Zubrow, W. Hayes, J. Siegel and D. Goldenson,Maturity Questionnaire (Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1944).
W.S. Humphrey,A Discipline for Software Engineering (Addison-Wesley, 1995).
S. Masters and C. Bothwell,CMM Appraisal Framework, Version 1.0 (Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1995).
D. Goldenson and J. Herbsleb,A Systematic Survey of Process Improvement, Its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success (Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1995).
ImproveIT, 1991, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 N865.
Proposal for a Study Period on Process Management, 1991, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 N872.
Study Report: The Need and Requirements for a Software Process Assessment Standard, 1992, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 N994R.
New Work Item Proposal to Develop A Standard for Software Process Assessment, 1993, ISO/IEC JTC1 N2104.
Summary of Voting on JTC1/N2104 Proposal for NWI: Software Process Assessment, 1993, ISO/IEC JTC1 N2312.
A. Dorling, History of the SPICE Project,2nd International SPICE Symposium, Brisbane, Australia, 1995, pp. 1–7 (Australian Software Quality Research Institute, Griffith University).
Product Specification for a Software Process Assessment Standard, 1993, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7/WG10 N016.
Requirements Specification for a Software Process Assessment Standard, 1993, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7/WG10 N017.
M. Paulk and M. Konrad, An overview of ISO's SPICE project,American Programmer,7, (1994) 16–20.
M. Paulk, A perspective on the issues facing SPICE,Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Software Quality, Austin, Texas, USA, 1995, pp. 415–424.
M. Konrad, M. Paulk and A. Graydon, An overview of SPICE's model for process management,Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Software Quality, Austin, Texas, USA, 23–26 October 1995, pp. 291–301.
T. Rout, (ed.)Proceedings of the 2nd International SPICE Symposium, 1995 (Australian Software Quality Research Institute, Griffith University).
F. Maclennan and G. Ostrolenk. The SPICE trials: validating the framework,2nd International SPICE Symposium, Brisbane, Australia, 1995, pp. 109–117 (Ausgralian Software Quality Research Institute, Griffith University).
K. El Emam and D. Goldenson, SPICE: an empiricist's perspective,2nd International Software Engineering Standards Symposium, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1995, pp. 84–97 (IEEE Computer Society Technical Council on Software Engineering).
International Standard ISO/IEC 12207, Information Technology-Software Life Cycle Processes, International Organisation for Standardisation, International Electrotechnical Commission, 1995.
M. Paulk, M. Konrad and S. Garcia, CMM versus SPICE architectures,Software Process Newsletter, IEEE Computer Society Technical Council on Software Engineering, No. 3, Spring 1995, pp. 7–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kitson, D.H. Relating the SPICE framework and SEI approach to software process assessment. Software Qual J 5, 145–156 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00678580
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00678580