Skip to main content
Log in

Cellular and molecular pharmacology of 4′-epidoxorubicin in HeLa Cells

Comparison with its parent drug, doxorubicin

  • Original Papers
  • Experimental Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects on cellular DNA and cytotoxicity produced by doxorubicin (Dx) and its epimer 4′-epidoxorubicin (4′E-Dx) were investigated in cultured HeLa cells. 4′E-Dx was 2.3 times more cytotoxic than Dx after 1 h of treatment, but the two anthracyclines were equally cytotoxic on longer-term (24h) drug exposure. The different kinetics of cell lethality were related to pharmacodynamic differences between the two drugs. In fact, cellular uptake and efflux rates of 4′E-Dx were faster than those of Dx on 1 h of drug exposure but similar after 24 h of treatment. 4′E-Dx caused more protein-concealed strand breaks in DNA (single and double) than did Dx, despite a lower potency for free-radical formation. The degree of strand breakage by 4′E-Dx was not a linear function of exposure time and, in fact, the rate of strand-break induction declined continuously with time. In contrast, Dx caused an almost linear increase in DNA single-strand breaks with time during 1 h of drug exposure; this was apparently due to its slower uptake. There was little repair of the DNA single-strand breaks produced by Dx upon postincubation for 5 h in a drug-free medium, whereas DNA lesions caused by 4′E-Dx were removed with a t 1/2 of about 1.7h. These findings underline the importance of the cellular pharmacokinetics of anthracyclines in relation to their cytotoxic and DNA-damaging effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DX:

doxorubicin

4′E-Dx:

4′-epidoxorubicin

References

  • Arcamone F, Penco S, Vigevani A, Radaelli S, Franchi G, Di Marco A, Casazza AM, Dasdia T, Formelli F, Soranzo C (1975) Synthesis and antitumor properties of new glycosides of daunomycinone and adriamycinone. J Med Chem 18:703–707

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bachur NR, Gordon SL, Gee MW, Kon H (1979) NADPH cytochrome reductase activation of quinone anticancer agents to free radicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:954–957

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelli A, Schinetti ML (1985) Effect of anthracyclines on superoxide production and metabolic activity of human neutrophils. Br J Pharmacol 86: 562P

  • Bradley MO, Kohn KW (1979) X-ray induced DNA double strand breaks production and repair in mammalian cells as measured by neutral filter elution. Nucleic Acid Res 7:793–804

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantoni O, Costa M (1983) Correlations of DNA strand breaks and their repair with cell survival following acute exposure to mercury (II) and X-rays. Molecular Pharmacology 24:84–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantoni O, Sestili P, Cattabeni F (1985) Detection of protein associated DNA breaks by the alkaline elution technique ulitizing polycarbonate and polyvinylchloride membranes. IRCS Med Sci 13:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter SK (1975) Adriamycin — a review. J Natl Cancer Inst 55:1265–1274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casazza AM, Di Marco A, Bertazzoli C, Formelli F, Giuliani FC, Pratesi G (1978) Antitumor activity, toxicity and pharmacological properties of 4′-epiadriamycin. In: Siegenthaler W, Luthy R (eds) Current chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, pp 1257–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Casazza AM, Di Marco A, Bonadonna G, Bonfante V, Bertazzoli C, Bellini O, Pratesi G, Sala L, Ballerini L (1980) Effects of modifications in position 4 of the chromophore or in position 4′ of the aminosugar, on the antitumor activity and toxicity of daunorubicin and doxorubicin. In: Crooke ST, Reich SD (eds) Anthracyclines: current status and new development. Academic Press, New York, pp 405–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzarelli NR (1980) DNA topoisomerases. Cell 22:327–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani F, Bellini O, Casazza AM, Formelli F, Savi G, Di Marco A (1978) Biologic characterization and chemotherapeutic response of MS-2 tumor: a non regressing mouse sarcoma derived from MSV-M induced sarcoma. Eur J Cancer 14:555–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston JB, Zwelling LA, Kerrigan D, Lloyd LS, Glazer RI (1983) Comparison of DNA scission and cytotoxicity produced by adriamycin and 5-iminodaunorubicin in human colon carcinoma cells. Biochem Pharmacol 32:2255–2258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn KW, Ewig RAG, Erickson LC, Zwelling LA (1981) Measurements of strand breaks and cross-links by alkaline elution. In: Friedberg EC, Hanawalt P (eds) DNA repair: a laboratory manual of research procedures, Dekker, New York, pp 379–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Lown JW, Chen HH, Plambeck JA, Acton EM (1979) Diminished superoxide anion generation by reduced 5-imioodaunorubicin relative to daunorubicin and the anthracycline antitumor agents. Biochem Pharmacol 28:2563–2568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pommier Y, Kerrigan D, Schwartz R, Zwelling LA (1982) The formation and resealing of intercalator-induced DNA strand breaks in isolated L1210 cell nuclei. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 107:576–583

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pommier Y, Schwartz RE, Kohn KW, Zwelling LA (1984) Formation and rejoning of deoxyribonucleic acid double strand breaks induced in isolated cell nuclei by antineoplastic intercalating agents. Biochemistry 23:3194–3201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross WE, Glaubiger DL, Kohn KW (1978) Protein-associated DNA breaks in cells treated with adriamycin or ellilpticine. Biochim Biophys Acta 519:23–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross WE, Zwelling LA, Kohn KW (1979) Relationships between cytotoxicity and DNA strand breakage produced by adriamycin and other intercalating agents. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 5:1221–1224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tewey KM, Rowe TC, Yang L, Halligan BD, Liu LF (1984) Science 226:466–468

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiernik PH (1980) Current status of adriamycin and daunorubicin in cancer treatment. In: Crooke ST, Reich SD (eds) Anthracyclimes: current status and new developments. Academic Press, New York, pp 275–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwelling LA, Michaels S, Erickson LC, Ungerleider RS, Nichols M, Kohn KW (1981) Protein-associated deoxyribonucleic acid strand breaks in L1210 cells treated with the doxyribonucleic acid intercalating agents 4′-(9-cridinylamino)-methanesulfon-m-anisidide and adriamycin. Biochemistry 20:6553–6563

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwelling LA, Kerrigan D, Michaels S (1982) Cytotoxicity and DNA strand breaks by 5-iminodaunorubicin in mouse leukemia L1210 cells comparison with adriamycin and 4′(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide. Cancer Res 42:2687–2691

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cantoni, O., Sestili, P., Cattabeni, F. et al. Cellular and molecular pharmacology of 4′-epidoxorubicin in HeLa Cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 115, 373–378 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00400965

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00400965

Key words

Navigation