Skip to main content
Log in

Allopolyploidization of autopolyploids I. Possibilities and limitations

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Under certain conditions the meiotic (and consequently genetic) system of allopolyploids offers advantages over that of autopolyploids. It has appeared possible to convert the meiotic system of autopolyploids partially or completely into that of allopolyploids (allopolyploidization). A critical discussion of the utility, and the possibilities and limitations of this conversion is given, considering purpose (fertility, fixation of heterosis, rapid stabilization) and breeding system (self-fertilizers, cross-fertilizers, hybrid strains).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AhloowaliaB. S., 1963. Study of a translocation in tetraploid rye. Genetica 33: 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • BenderK. & GaulH., 1966. Zur Frage der Diploidisierung autotetraploider Gerste. Z. Pflanzenzüchtung 56: 164–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • BhaskaranS. & SwaminathanM. S., 1961. Polyploidy and radiosensitivity in wheat and barley. I. Cytological and cytochemical studies. Genetica 32: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • BremerG. & Bremer-ReindersD. E., 1954. Breeding of tetraploid rye in the Netherlands. I. Methods and cytological investigations. Euphytica 3: 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldecott, R. S., 1961. Irradiation and plant improvement. In: R. E. Hodgson (Editor), Germ plasm resources. Publ. 66, Am Ass. Adv. Sci., pp. 279–293.

  • DawsonC. D. R., 1941. Tetrasomic inheritance in Lotus corniculatus L. J. Genet. 42: 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • DemarlyY., 1963. Génétique des tétraploïdes et amélioration des plantes. Ann. Amélior. Plantes 13: 307–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, T. D., 1967. Diploidization of induced tetraploid hybrids of Dactylis glomerata by means of X-ray irradiation. Ph. D. Thesis Iowa State University.

  • DoyleG. G., 1963a. Preferential pairing in trisome 3 plants with two standard chromosomes 3 and a chromosome 3 from exotic strains of maize. Maize Genet. Coop. News Letter 37: 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • DoyleG. G., 1963b. Preferential pairing in structural heterozygotes of Zea mays. Genetics 48: 1011–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • DoyleG. G., 1966. Preferential pairing in trisomic plants containing an irradiated chromosome. Maize Genet. Coop. News Letter 40: 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • DudleyJ. W. & AlexanderD. E., 1966. Seed set in an autotetraploid maize synthetic. Maize Genet. Coop. News Letter 40: 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • EndrizziJ. E., 1962. The diploid-like cytological behaviour of tetraploid cotton. Evolution 16: 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • FeldmanM., Mello-SampayoT. & SearsE. R., 1966. Somatic association in Triticum aestivum. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 56: 1192–1199.

    Google Scholar 

  • GaulH., 1958. Present aspects of induced mutations in plant breeding. Euphytica 7: 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • GillesA. & RandolphL. G., 1951. Reduction of quadrivalent frequency in autotetraploid maize during a period of ten years. Am. J. Bot. 38: 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrellE. H., 1961. Variation in preferential segregation on chromosome two in triploid females of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 46: 1267–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • IsingG., 1967. Fertility and heterosis in tetraploid barley. Hereditas 57: 327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • LinnertG., 1962. Untersuchungen an Hemiploiden nachkommen Autotetraploider. I. Der Verteilungsmodus einer Reziproken Translokation und die daraus folgende Erhöhung der Heterozygotenfrequenz in der Nachkommenschaft von Duplex-Heterozygoten. Z. Vererbungslehre 93: 389–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac KeyJ., 1956. Mutation breeding in Europe. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 9: 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Key, J., 1961. Methods of utilizing induced mutations in crop improvement. NAS-NRC Symp. Mutation and Plant Breeding, pp. 336–364.

  • Müntzing, A., 1948. Experiences from work with induced polyploidy in cereals. Svalöf 1886–1946, pp. 324–337.

  • MüntzingA. & PrakkenR., 1940. The mode of chromosome pairing in Phleum twins with 63 chromosomes and its cytogenetic consequences. Hereditas 26: 463–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • NordenskiöldH., 1953. An investigation into two tetraploid strains of vetches (Vicia sativa) and their hybrid products. Kungl. Lantbrukhögskolans Ann. 19: 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReesH. & JonesG. H., 1967. Chromosome evolution in Lolium. Heredity 22: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReinbergsE., 1964. Autotetraploids in barley. Barley Genetics, Proc. 1st Int. Barley Genetics Symp. 1: 151–154. Rice genetics and cytogenetics, 1964. Proc. Symp. at Los Banos, Philippines, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • RileyR. & ChapmanV., 1958. The genetic control of cytologically diploid behaviour of hexaploid wheat. Nature 182: 713–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommel, M., 1955. Über Herstellung, Auslese und Fertilität tetraploiden Gersten. Thesis, Justus Liebig Hochschule, Giessen.

  • RoseweirJ. & ReesH., 1962. Fertility and chromosome pairing in autotetraploid rye. Nature 195: 203–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • SearsE. R. & OkamotoM., 1958. Intergenomic chromosome relationships of non-homologous chromosomes in wheat. Proc. Xth Int. Congr. Genet. 2: 258–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShaverD. L., 1962. A study of meiosis in perennial teosinte, in tetraploid maize and in their tetraploid hybrid. Caryologia 15: 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShaverD. L., 1963. The effect of structural heterozygosity on the degree of preferential pairing in allotetraploids of Zea. Genetics 48: 515–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • SisodiaN. S. & ShebeskiL. H., 1965. Synthesis of complete interchange stocks in barley (H. vulgare L.). Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 7: 164–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • SkiebeK., 1966. Polyploidie und Fertilität. Z. Pflanzenzüchtung 56: 301–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • StebbinsG. L., 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • StebbinsG. L., 1956. Artificial polyploidy as a tool in plant breeding. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 9: 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • SwaminathanM. S. & SulbhaK., 1959. Multivalent frequency and seed fertility in raw and evolved tetraploids of Brassica campestris var. Toria. Z. Vererbungslehre 90: 385–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sybenga, J., 1965. The use of chromosomal aberrations in the allopolyploidization of autopolyploids. Proc. Symp. FAO/IAEA, The use of induced mutations in plant breeding, Rome 1964: 761–768.

  • SybengaJ., 1966a. The role of meiotic chromosome pairing pattern in induced structural allopolyploidization of autopolyploids. Acta Agric. Scand. Suppl. 16: 43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sybenga, J., 1966b. Reciprocal translocations and preferential pairing in autotetraploid rye. In: C. D. Darlington and K. R. Lewis (Editors), Chromosomes today. Vol. 1, pp. 66–70.

  • SybengaJ., 1966c. The zygomere as hypothetical unit of chromosome pairing initiation. Genetica 37: 186–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • SybengaJ., 1970. The allopolyploidization of autopolyploids. II. Manipulation of the chromosome pairing system. Euphytica 19: 00–00.

    Google Scholar 

  • TsuchiyaT., 1969a. Cytogenetics of 16 chromosome plants in barley. Chromosoma (Berl.) 26: 130–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • TsuchiyaT., 1969b. Status of studies of primary trisomics and other aneuploids in barley. Genetica 40: 216–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • WaltersM. S. & GerstelD. U., 1948. A cytological investigation of a tetraploid Rhoeo discolor. Am. J. Bot. 35: 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sybenga, J. Allopolyploidization of autopolyploids I. Possibilities and limitations. Euphytica 18, 355–371 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397783

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397783

Keywords

Navigation