Summary
Pyrethrum clones cannot be satisfactorily identified by morphological traits, or by contents or types of pyrethrins.
In pyrethrum a sporophytic incompatibility system operates. Most clones are strongly self-incompatible and cross-compatible. This was used as the basis of a revised identification system. It is assumed that in self-incompatibility and cross-compatibility the clones are identical. To test this assumption 128 different genotypes were selfed and crossed in 86 combinations. Only two genotypes (1.6%) were self-compatible and only one cross (1.2%) was reciprocally cross-incompatible.
Since only a restricted number of clones is recommended and therefore issued, the incompatibility test together with morphology, especially of the flower, ensures an entirely satisfactory identification. Two applications are given.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BrewerJ. G., 1968. Flowering and seedsetting in pyrethrum (Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium Vis.). A review. Pyrethrum Post 9 (4): 18–21.
Contant, R. B., 1963. The current position of pyrethrum breeding in Kenya. Proc. East Afric. Acad., pp. 93–96.
HeadS. W., 1967. A study of the insecticidal constituents of Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium. III. Their composition in different clones. Pyrethrum Post 9 (2): 3–7.
KhoY. O. & BaërJ., 1968. Observing pollen tubes by means of fluorescence. Euphytica 17: 298–302
MartinF. W., 1959. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technol. 34: 125–127.
WilliamsW., 1964. Genetical principles and plant breeding. Chapter VI. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 504 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brewer, J.G., Parlevliet, J.E. Incompatibility as a new method for identification of pyrethrum clones. Euphytica 18, 320–325 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397778
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397778