Skip to main content
Log in

Osmotic adjustment and the inhibition of leaf, root, stem and silk growth at low water potentials in maize

  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The expansion growth of plant organs is inhibited at low water potentials (Ψ w), but the inhibition has not been compared in different organs of the same plant. Therefore, we determined elongation rates of the roots, stems, leaves, and styles (silks) of maize (Zea mays L.) as soil water was depleted. The Ψ w was measured in the region of cell expansion of each organ. The complicating effects of transpiration were avoided by making measurements at the end of the dark period when the air had been saturated with water vapor for 10 h and transpiration was less than 1% of the rate in the light. Growth was inhibited as the Ψ w in the region of cell expansion decreased in each organ. The Ψ w required to stop growth was-0.50,-0.75, and-1.00 MPa, in this order, in the stem, silks, and leaves. However, the roots grew at these Ψ w and ceased only when Ψ w was lower than-1.4 MPa. The osmotic potential decreased in each region of cell expansion and, in leaves, roots and stems, the decrease was sufficient to maintain turgor fully. In the silks, the decrease was less and turgor fell. In the mature tissue, the Ψ w of the stem, leaves and roots was similar to that of the soil when adequate water was supplied. This indicated that an equilibrium existed between these tissues, the vascular system, and the soil. At the same time, the Ψ w was lower in the expanding regions than in the mature tissues, indicating that there was a Ψ w disequilibrium between the growing tissue and the vascular system. The disequilibrium was interpreted as a Ψ w gradient for supplying water to the enlarging cells. When water was withheld, this gradient disappeared in the leaf because Ψ w decreased more in the xylem than in the soil, indicating that a high flow resistance had developed in the xylem. In the roots, the gradient did not decrease because vascular Ψ w changed about the same amount as the soil Ψ w. Therefore, the gradient in Ψ w favored water uptake by roots but not leaves at low Ψ w. The data show that expansion growth responds to low Ψ w differently in different growing regions of the plant. Because growth depends on the maintenance of turgor for extending the cell walls and the presence of Ψ w gradients for supplying water to the expanding cells, several factors could have been responsible for these differences. The decrease of turgor in the silks and the loss of the Ψ w gradient in the leaves probably contributed to the high sensitivity of these organs. In the leaves, the gradient loss was so complete that it would have prevented growth regardless of other changes. In the roots, the maintenance of turgor and Ψ w gradients probably allowed growth to continue. This difference in turgor and gradient maintenance could contribute to the increase in root/shoot ratios generally observed in water-limited conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ψ s :

osmotic potential

Ψ w :

water potential

References

  • Acevedo, E., Fereres, E., Hsiao, T.C., Henderson, D.W. (1979) Diurnal growth trends, water potential, and osmotic adjustment of maize and sorghum leaves in the field. Plant Physiol. 64, 476–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Acevedo, E., Hsiao, T.C., Henderson, D.W. (1971) Immediate and subsequent growth responses of maize leaves to changes in water status. Plant Physiol. 48, 631–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, P.G. (1981) Root growth and solute accumulation in pea in response to water stress and powdery mildew. Physiol. Plant Pathol 19, 169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrs, H.D. (1965) Comparison of water potentials in leaves as measured by two types of thermocouple psychrometers. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 18, 36–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Blizzard, W.E., Boyer, J.S. (1980) Comparative resistance of the soil and the plant to water transport. Plant Physiol. 66, 809–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, J.S. (1967) Leaf water potentials measured with a pressure chamber. Plant Physiol. 42, 133–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, J.S. (1968) Relationship of water potential to growth of leaves. Plant Physiol. 43, 1056–1062

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, J.S. (1970) Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybeans, and sunflower at various water potentials. Plant Physiol 46, 233–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, J.S. (1971) Recovery of photosynthesis in sunflower after a period of low leaf water potential. Plant Physiol. 47, 816–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, J.S. (1974) Water transport in plants: mechanism of apparent changes in resistance during absorption. Planta 117, 187–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, J.S., Knipling, E.B. (1965) Isopiestic technique for measuring leaf water potentials in leaves with a thermocouple psychrometer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 54, 1049–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, J.S., Wu, G. (1978) Auxin increases the hydraulic conductivity of auxin-sensitive hypocotyl tissue. Planta 139, 227–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, J.A. (1977) Leaf elongation in relation to leaf water potential in soybeans. J. Exp. Bot. 28, 156–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri, A.J., Boyer, J.S. (1982) Water potentials induced by growth in soybean hypocotyls. Plant Physiol. 69, 492–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, A.C.P., McPherson, H.G. (1977) Sensitivity to desiccation of leaf extension in prairie grass. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 4, 381–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D.J. (1981) Analysis of the dynamic and steady-state responses of growth rate and turgor pressure to changes in cell parameters. Plant Physiol. 68, 1439–1446

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D.L., Cleland, R.E. (1983) Solutes in the free space of growing stem tissue. Plant Physiol. 72, 326–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D.L., Van Volkenburgh, E., Cleland, R.E. (1984) Stress relaxation of cell walls and the yield threshold for growth. Planta 162, 46–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, J.M., Rains, D.W. (1977) Effect of irrigation history on responses of cotton to subsequent water stress. Crop Sci. 17, 329–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, J.M., Rains, D.W., Loomis, R.S. (1977) Role of changes in solute concentration in maintaining favorable water balance in field-grown cotton. Agron. J. 69, 773–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, J.M., Shannon, K.W., Steponkus, P.L. (1980) Influence of water deficits and osmotic adjustment on leaf elongation in rice. Crop Sci. 20, 314–318

    Google Scholar 

  • El Nadi, A.H., Brouwer, R., Locker, J.Th. (1969) Some responses of the root and the shoot of Vicia faba plants to water deficits. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 17, 133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, C.T. (1955) The response of the young tomato plant to a brief period of water shortage. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 8, 196–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Greacen, E.L., Oh, J.S. (1972) Physics of root growth. Nature New Biol. 235, 24–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, M.P., Johnson, R.R. (1981) Drought stress and its effect on maize reproductive systems. Crop Sci. 21, 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland, D.R., Arnon, D.I. (1950) The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stat. Circ. 347

  • Hoffman, G.T., Rawlins, S.L., Garber, M.J., Cullen, E.M. (1971) Water relations and growth of cotton as influenced by salinity and relative humidity. Agron. J. 63, 822–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, T.C., Acevedo, E. (1974) Plant responses to water deficits, water-use efficiency, and drought resistance. Agric. Meteorol. 14, 59–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, T.C., Acevedo, E., Fereres, E., Henderson, D.W. (1976) Water stress, growth, and osmotic adjustment. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 273, 479–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.M., Turner, N.C. (1978) Osmotic adjustment in leaves of sorghum in response to water deficits. Plant Physiol. 61, 122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesselback, T.A. (1949) The structure and reproduction of corn. Univ. of Nebraska Coll. Agric., Agr. Exp. Stat. Res. Bull. No. 161

  • Lockhart, J.A. (1965) An analysis of irreversible cell extension. J. Theor. Biol. 8, 264–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, K., Riazi, A. (1981) Stress-induced osmotic adjustment in growing regions of barley leaves. Plant Physiol. 68, 571–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R.F., Boyer, J.S. (1972) Sensitivity of cell division and cell elongation to low water potentials in soybean hypocotyls. Planta 108, 77–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R.F., Boyer, J.S. (1981) Osmoregulation, solute distribution, and growth in soybean seedlings having low water potentials. Planta 151, 482–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelena, V.A., Boyer, J.S. (1982) Complete turgor maintenance at low water potentials in the elongation region of maize leaves. Plant Physiol. 69, 1145–1149

    Google Scholar 

  • Milburn, J.A. (1966) The conduction of sap. I. Water conduction and cavitation in water stressed leaves. Planta 69, 34–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Molz, F.L., Boyer, J.S. (1978) Growth-induced water potentials in plant cells and tissues. Plant Physiol. 62, 423–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Munns, R., Brady, C.J., Barlow, E.W.R. (1979) Solute accumulation in the apex and leaves of wheat during water stress. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 6, 379–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Munns, R., Wier, R. (1981) Contribution of sugars to osmotic adjustment in elongating and expanded zones of wheat leaves during moderate water deficits at two light levels. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 8, 93–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, P.M., Green, P.B., Cleland, R. (1972) Role of turgor in plant cell growth. Nature 239, 163–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, D.J., Bartlett, E.M. (1972) The physiology of drought resistance in soybean plants (Glycine max). J. Appl. Ecol. 9, 481–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, R.E., Davies, W.J. (1979) Solute regulation and growth by roots and shoots of water stressed maize plants. Planta 147, 43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Takami, S., Turner, N.C., Rawson, H.M. (1981) Leaf expansion of four sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars in relation to water deficits. 1. Pattern during plant development. Plant Cell Environ. 4, 399–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Westgate, M.E., Boyer, J.S. (1984) Transpiration-and growth-induced water potentials in maize. Plant Physiol. 74, 882–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Westgate, M.E., Boyer, J.S. (1985) Carbohydrate reserves and reproductive development at low leaf water potentials in maize. Crop Science, in press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westgate, M.E., Boyer, J.S. Osmotic adjustment and the inhibition of leaf, root, stem and silk growth at low water potentials in maize. Planta 164, 540–549 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395973

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395973

Key words

Navigation