Skip to main content
Log in

Propagule type influences competition between two submersed aquatic macrophytes

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Glasshouse competition experiments with Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle indicate that plants grown from turions are weaker competitors than those grown from tubers, when compared to the widely distributed macrophyte, Potamogeton pectinatus L. These results support an earlier hypothesis about the importance of propagule size for predicting the outcome of plant competition (Grace 1985; Schaffer and Gadgil 1980). Results of outdoor growth experiments indicate that even though Hydrilla plants from turions are relatively weaker competitors, they are able to grow succesfully in an existing macrophyte bed composed of either, P. pectinatus or P. gramineus. During the early stages of Hydrilla invasion into an area of existing macrophytes, native plants may coexist with Hydrilla. However, once the abundance of Hydrilla tubers in the sediment increases, Hydrilla may displace existing plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agami M, Waisel Y (1985) Inter-relationships between Najas marina L. and three other species of aquatic macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 126:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson LWJ (1985) Prelimianry research on monoecious hydrilla. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Miscellaneous Paper A-854, pp 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MR, Kalff J (1986) Regulation of submerged aquatic plant distribution in a uniform area of a weedbed. J Ecol 74:953–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Barko JW, Adams MS, Clesceri NL (1986) Environmental factors and their consideration in the management of submersed aquatic vegetation: a review. J Aquat Plant Manage 24:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss CI (1970) Statistics in biology, vol 2. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter V, Rybicki N (1986) Resurgence of submersed aquatic macrophytes in the tidal Potomac River, Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia. Estuaries 9:368–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Lodge DM (1986) Effects of submersed macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquat Bot 6:341–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly J (1987) On the use of response models in mixture experiments. Oecologia 72:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Firbank LG, Watkinson AR (1985) On the analysis of competition within two-species mixtures of plants. J Appl Eco 22:503–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Firbank LG, Watkinson AR (1986) Modelling the population dynamics of an arable weed and its effects upon crop yield. J Appl Ecol 23:147–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB (1985) Juvenile vs. adult competitive abilities in plants: size-dependence in cattails (Typha). Ecology 66:1630–1638

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB, Wetzel RG (1981) Habitat partitioning and competitive displacement in cattails (Typha): experimental field studies. Am Nat 118:463–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB, Wetzel RG (1982) Niche differentiation between two rhizomatous plant species: Typha latifolia and Typha angustifolia. Can J Bot 60:46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Law R, Watkinson AR (1987) Response-surface analysis of two species competition from an experiment on Phleum arenarium and Vulpia fasciculata. J Ecol 75:871–886

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreary NJ, Carpenter SR (1987) Density-dependent growth interactions between Eleocharis acicularis (L.) R. & S. and Juncus pelocarpus forma submersus Fassett. Aquat Bot 27:229–241

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreary NJ, Carpenter SR, Chaney JE (1983) Coexistence and interference in two submersed freshwater perennial plants. Oecologia (Berlin) 59:383–396

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland DG, Barko JW (1987) Effects of temperature and sediment type on growth and morphology of monoecious and dioecious Hydrilla. J Freshwater Ecol 4:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Motomura S, Shinozaki K, Yoda K (1986) Competition between two similar plant varieties, green shrunk perilla and red shrunk perila, in mixed cultures. Bot Mag 99:395–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa H (1961) Experimental studies on the crowding effect in mixed populations of higher plants. Dep. Agric. Thesis, Kyoto Univ. (in Japanese)

  • Pieterse AH (1981) Hydrilla verticillata — a review. Abstr Trop Agric 7:9–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Robinson GR, Rejmánková E (1989) Weed-crop competition: experimental designs and models for data analysis. Weed Sci 37:276–284

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1985) SAS User's Guide: Statistics, 5th edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer WM, Gadgil MD (1980) Selection for optimal life histories in plants. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press, Cambridge, pp 142–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J (1987) Introduction to plant population ecology, 2nd edn.. Longman Scientific & Technical, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DF (1986) Tuber demography and its consequences for Potamogeton pectinatus L. Proc EWRS/AAB 7th Symp Aquat Weeds 1986, pp 321–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DF (1987) Tuber size and planting depth influence growth of Potamogeton pectinatus L. Am Midl Nat 118:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DF, Anderson LWJ (1986) Photoperiod responses in monoecious and dioecious Hydrilla verticillata. Weed Sci 34:551–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DF, Anderson LWJ (1987) Influence of photoperiod on growth, pigment composition and vegetative propagule formation for Potamogeton nodosus Poir. and Potamogeton pectinatus L. Aquat Bot 28:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DF, Anderson LWJ, Ames MD, Ryan FJ (1987) Variation in Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.). Royle propagule weight. J Aquat Plant Manage 25:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitters CJT (1983) An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 1. estimation of competition effects. Neth J Agric Sci 31:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML (1984) Seed variation in wild radish: effect of seed size on components of seedling and adult fitness. Ecology 65:1105–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward KK, Van TK (1987) Comparative studies of monoecious and dioecious hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) biotypes. Weed Sci 35:204–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward KK, Van TK, Carter V, Pieterse AH (1984) Hydrilla invades Washington, D.C. and the Potomac. Am J Bot 71:162–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Suehiro K, Ogawa H (1980) Competition between two annual herbs, Atriplex ginelini CA Mey and Chenopodium album L., in mixed cultures irrigated with seawater of various concentrations. Oecologia 45:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus JE, Stephens MD (1983) Neighbor influences and seasonal growth patterns for Vallisneria americana in a mesotrophic lake. Oecologia 56:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wijk RJ (1983) Life-cycles and reproductive strategies of Potamogeton pectinatus L. in The Netherlands and the Camargue (France). Proc Internat Symp Aquat Macrophytes, Nijmegen 18–23 September 1983: pp 317–321

  • Watkinson AR (1981) Interference in pure and mixed population of Agyostemma githago. J Appl Ecol 18:967–976

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright AJ (1981) The analysis of yield-density relationships in binary mixtures using inverse polynomials. J Agric Sci 96:561–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall Inc Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spencer, D.F., Rejmánek, M. Propagule type influences competition between two submersed aquatic macrophytes. Oecologia 81, 132–137 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377022

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377022

Key words

Navigation